> ViperXXXXXXX said on
11-25-2009 at
01:29:
Well, the cover up was impossible, I don't recall any conspiracy gaining much more political movements, nor has any cover up created so many documentaries. I don't even think there are as many about JFK... Word is spreading fast so no, this was not covered up well...You say the Govt. changes every 4-8 years. Isn't it convenient to always be able to blame the last president? This seems somewhat unwise when considering JFK has already admitted there to be a secret society, CIA. Then he's shot.
> rogerrodd said on
11-24-2009 at
23:16:
We could've saved a lot of time if you'd led off by saying that you believe the Warren Commission and that "reality & science" disproved mountains of incontrovertible evidence . I don't know why you would visit a site like this. Your mind is clearly made up to endorse this gov's covert activities & subsequent cover ups. I began by believing The WC & the Bin Laden 19 Arabs lie. Exposing the lies took time but once heard it has an unmistakable ring of truth. The same can be said of lies. Be well.
> rogerrodd said on
11-24-2009 at
23:04:
At least you've remained courteous & not resorted to the usual YouTube ad hominems. I don't believe we need to debate this any further however. Your arguments are fallaciously based upon a belief that we are still a functioning democracy. You believe we are really changing every 4-8 years. This is a 1 party system that precludes any 3rd party candidates from debates, fair campaign funding, & objective media exposure. "Gov is evil" heartstrings is pure Fox News BS- they want their country back.
> JackWisps said on
11-24-2009 at
22:52:
"independent, substantiated research" Is it peer reviewed? Much of it isn't. Yes it is indep people, with degrees and qualifications, but they do not test it as thoroughly as peer review would provide, and they are biased...a similar example: there are many qualified people who think Kennedy's assassination was a planned event, or there was a second shooter, etc. Those people are in the same boat as your indep researchers, and they have also been debunked by reality and good science
> JackWisps said on
11-24-2009 at
22:43:
"you continue to give them the benefit of doubt"Partially because the government changes every 4-8 years, partially because a coverup on this scale would be basically impossible, and partially because peer reviewed stuff has confirmed a fair portion of their side, where as your side usually goes for the heart strings and 'the gov't is evil!' arguments. and is that a no to being able to be 'turned'? cause if it is, there's no real point to discussion (more to come)
> rogerrodd said on
11-24-2009 at
22:37:
I'm merely drawing conclusions from your admitted POV. While you admit the gov has lied, clearly has a motive & hidden agenda, you continue to give them the benefit of doubt. You question independent, substantiated research done at great cost in terms of finance & image attack by the gov controlled media, by people whose only agenda is truth, and you still want to ride the fence. I'm hard line on the side of reality & 9/11 is the end product of it's PNAC founders who forecast it long ago.
> JackWisps said on
11-24-2009 at
22:22:
those statements show I'm not hard line either side. You on the other hand seem unable to be turned away from your opinion by anything. Is that true? or could you conceivably be convinced by the other side?I never said I believed the gov, I actually said they lie often and take the study that supports their goals...I am dubious of liars, the problem is finding if they are liars, if the people you are believing are liars, both, or neither.Stop putting words in my mouth and strawmanning me
> rogerrodd said on
11-24-2009 at
20:13:
Statements like "not evident by any of this" & "completely plausible" obviously work for you. You're also willing to believe a gov & their so called experts that produced a 9/11 Commission Report that completely ignored WTC7 & that doesn't concern you either. I'm dubious of liars-you're clearly not. The truth NEVER sounds like the story you endorse. Your lack of historical knowledge concerning other proven false flag attacks & heinous conspiracies executed by this gov is painfully obvious.
> JackWisps said on
11-24-2009 at
19:57:
Experts for both sides have done legitimate simulations, evidence gathering, etc. The gov't often chooses the study that will result in the best spin for their goals, but whether they had those goals before the event, or just seen an opportunity is not evident by any of thisAnd yes, a coordinated hijacking of jets, letting on no sign that they were taken until too late, and the most powerful military in history being startled, hesitating, making a bad choice (whatever) is completely plausible.
> rogerrodd said on
11-24-2009 at
10:36:
Every so called counter argument to all of the hard earned evidence gained IN SPITE of this gov's efforts has repeatedly been destroyed by the truth. The "experts" on what you call my side aren't hired guns who are paid to twist & distort the facts & any semblance of simple logic. Is your head so far up your ass that you've set logic aside? Is it logical that 19 Arabs with box cutters & commercial jets stymied the most powerful military in history? THAT'S the most implausible 'conspiracy' idea.
> JackWisps said on
11-24-2009 at
05:46:
You do know that there are also counter arguments/evidence for almost, if not all of the claims made in this film right? or is you head so far up your ass that you haven't looked at both sides, assume the 'experts' on your side are better than the 'experts' on the other, and then mock everyone with an opposing view?Personally I doubt the gov't gave a 100% accurate report on events, when do they? But that's about as far as I'll go with the 'conspiracy' ideas.
> MachoKokoa said on
11-13-2009 at
21:45:
@avalonwitch Primarily; the unseen govt. Those who have the ulterior motive of Middle Eastern conquest with the dual effect of turning the bastion of freedom (according to many) into their epitome police state. So far, everything's going according to plan. Those pushing for world power is playing to a plan, everything happens in sequence. Terror = Fear....Financial Collapses = Fear..War = Fear.How do you pen sheep? With a sheep dog of course!Barking = Fear.The same goes for sheople
> rogerrodd said on
11-04-2009 at
02:01:
For all the head up their ass, jingoist, puppet people that invade and deny every 9/11 site on the Internet exposing the gov's lies, HERE is just a shred of the evidence that you keep claiming doesn't exist.
> pennelp7770 said on
10-31-2009 at
05:52:
Americans don't give up ur weapons..you may need them one day to fight for ur lives against US govt and marshal law...fight for ur rites
> pennelp7770 said on
10-31-2009 at
05:49:
trade tower 7 fell from the bottom...not the top...explosives placed at the base caused it to come down...undeniabley
> avalonwitch said on
10-23-2009 at
23:40:
cui bono?
> klnine said on
10-19-2009 at
03:10:
So if the towers truly collapsed from the effect of burning fuel then all tower building regulations..globally , would have been re- visited in light of this finding . In comparison the oil and gas business was significantly shaken up in light of the findings of a REAL enquiry following the Piper Alpha explosion.! Q. Any civil engineers out there involved I a review of building design in light of 9/11 ???
> BTek4 said on
10-19-2009 at
00:32:
It's hard to know what is going on when you're sleeping.
> WEASELFROG21 said on
10-18-2009 at
23:40:
Every patriotic American should have a good dose of paranoia when it comes to the stories the government tells; that's how you think for yourself and don't get sucked in by propaganda. The official story is WAY too inconsistent to be the truth, so put on your thinking cap and ASK QUESTIONS, DEMAND ANSWERS! 9/11 Truth Now!
> mrcarlos15 said on
10-18-2009 at
14:16:
Ahhh, I know what you are now. You're a born again Christian. Your mention of chips and 666 tipped you off. You have to understand, there is 300 people in this country. Over 90% of them own guns. Do you realize how many paranoid Southerners would be popping off? There is a clause in the Constitution that gives us power, that is if the current government isn't doing it's job, we have a right to revolt. There will be a second American Revolution if there was mandatory anything.