> nibelungvalesty said on
11-17-2009 at
06:53:
cool artist are darknatasha, rasasha, sqeedgemonster, skimike, spunky, and DJlawly
> ghostguy2k7 said on
11-01-2009 at
19:11:
Everyone has their own likes and dislikes and it's not for anyone but you to judge if what you like is wrong or not.
> ihavenonameeva said on
10-19-2009 at
02:31:
HOLY SHIT! how do you find so much yiff? I cant ever seem to find some if any. But yea...yiff is (in my opinion) very beutiful (spelt wrong) art. whats wrong with it?
> WaterCatDragonMew said on
07-31-2009 at
20:20:
I love that shirt. X3 LOL
> masterskill said on
07-26-2009 at
00:28:
hobbies include:
> sagepet said on
07-07-2009 at
09:49:
i love your videos and agree yiff is like all other porns of the world either its liked or hated if you dont wanna look at it move on dont rant and hate on something just cause its not natural to you i say let it be ...we yiffers leave other life styles alone why not return the favor
> BalooDumptruck said on
06-15-2009 at
14:28:
meh not worried about it, ive seen good, bad, werid, good, but all in all, everyon ehas different tatses, fo rme, as long as its drawn good and makes sense, then its fine
> Wolfie1807 said on
06-05-2009 at
16:29:
that's a little dramaticand exactly how am i not leting you live? where do you see all this yiff? i never see it when i'm not looking and do i force you to stop and look at it?we're not hurting anyone, it is just art. go whine at pedos or something, they're doing some real damage
> MrSchnabel65 said on
06-05-2009 at
09:42:
How can I let you live, when you won't let me live . You show to everyone your fetish, and your deluded lifestyle . By doing that you disgust me and others, and make us think that humanity is falling apart .
> Wolfie1807 said on
05-22-2009 at
20:06:
personally i just don't see how yiff is so different to any other erotic art or pornlive and let live
> Varcoure said on
05-01-2009 at
12:25:
I don't like it :/ I mean, I like anthro art, but I mean, if people want to draw it, I'll let them, but I'm not supporting it.I do not see the fandom as a fetish anyway. but I agree with you ^^
> XxRAVER18409xX said on
04-10-2009 at
15:23:
uhh what the hell is you'r point? i mean all i got was i have 600 pics... i realy dident get what the hell you where talking about? =/
> Ralathar44 said on
04-03-2009 at
01:02:
The point is not that furries do not posses sexuality. The point is not that furries do not add a furry twist to their sexuality. The point is the fandom itself is not a fetish because the fetish is a seperate entity completely.A good amount of the furry following is actually anti-kink. A good amount are indifferent. A good amount like it. A good amount are totally into it. If the fandom itself was a fetish this would not be so.That's my point.
> 1curis said on
04-01-2009 at
22:52:
I get where you're coming from, I just think its a bit extreme to say "Yiff isn't apart of the fandom." Sure thats one example, but what about the "dirty" art and fan fiction made by fan's themselves just for the pure enjoyment of having sex and kinks in the universe they love? Its the same with the Fandom. We have artist and writers, who are furries, revealing the sexual side of things to enhance the experience of being part of the fandom for themselves and others.
> Ralathar44 said on
04-01-2009 at
21:23:
It's broken down into the furry fandom and the furry fetish. Entirely possibly to like both or only one.As they are two seperate interests, though they are related, Yiff art is not part of the fandom. Though of course members of the fandom are much more likely to like yiff art than non-members and vice versa.A specific example is that there is a humorous star wars porn. But that does not make it part of the Star Wars fandom nor should members be related to that even if many like it.
> 1curis said on
04-01-2009 at
17:02:
Hah! A J.B. fan, eh? I have a few questions for you. In your "What furries aren't " vid, correct me if I misheard, you said something about yiff art not being a part of the fandom? Im pretty sure it is since it still relies on a person's interest in Anthropomorphic characters. The way I see it is, its just the other side of the Fandom. We're like any other fandom, be it Otakus, Trekkies or anyone else, in that we have our PR side and our Non-PR side. but you need two sides to make a whole.
> Ralathar44 said on
03-24-2009 at
21:24:
I hate overreactions. Yankee is entitled to his opinion even though he went out of his way to look at a video about yiffy.So instead of having one in the wrong we have 2 in the wrong thanks to your quick insult.
> mintsauce43 said on
03-24-2009 at
21:04:
i hate youre face
> rexcat said on
03-20-2009 at
04:53:
The way I see it, it's okay for people to hate it.Yet, those who hate it the most will be the most out front and vocal about it. Opinions amongst the "mundanes" may vary in degree.
> Yankees4ev3r said on
03-11-2009 at
21:02:
i hate yiffy