> boedonaldson said on
09-26-2008 at
11:59:
See that guy just standing there, he may have helped a little
> Cthrilla said on
09-12-2008 at
09:24:
Yeah their different. google images of both. wasn't the b-50 slightly longer? I could be worng.
> papuette said on
09-03-2008 at
20:11:
it depends of depth. Down in the ocean you have a kind of mud, por in oxigen. If it still there, is intact. No corrosion, because not oxidant.
> Pintac87 said on
08-31-2008 at
01:27:
The nacelles for the engines were different. Do a search on Google for B-50 images and you'll see the difference.
> dd9391 said on
08-18-2008 at
19:09:
Apparently all but one of the crew of I think ten died in this crash - makes you shudder
> LionsLAX13 said on
08-15-2008 at
17:21:
great plane, great vid. I was wondering if you can tell a B-29 from a B-50 by just looking at it from a picture? I'm dying to figure out if my grandfather was on a B-29 or a B-50 and he passed away and no one in my family knows much
> roaklin said on
07-27-2008 at
00:09:
Likely yes depending just where this happened. Thou 60 plus years of being in salt water you can forget about putting that baby back in the air.
> 586guest2 said on
07-04-2008 at
03:48:
yeah! for all of 14 seconds!
> 586guest2 said on
07-04-2008 at
03:47:
the flying cigar!
> sbchelldiver said on
06-21-2008 at
07:58:
The B 29 was a partially untested plane rushed into production it was quite treacherous in its early variants If u think it looks bad crash landing just imagine it crashing on take off fully loaded as it often did...despite this it was used as part of t repatriation craft at war's end & later became known as a very forgiving craft once its bugs were ironed out...
> Blogengezer said on
03-08-2008 at
23:51:
High octane aviation gasolene turned them into flying 'molotov coctails'. Gun cam films often showed them as flying fireballs. In the C-119 I could often smell the odor of Gasolene. Difficult to keep it from leaking out at times.
> stephenpprice said on
02-29-2008 at
22:33:
good landing if you ask me
> gould1966 said on
02-23-2008 at
04:51:
I cant decide if the men who volunteered for the bombers were brave or nuts....probaly both. Hats off to all who served, thank you for your service.
> merseyside said on
02-18-2008 at
19:06:
i like the way the man in the video just stands there insted of running towards the plane
> terryjohn said on
02-15-2008 at
04:42:
IS IT STILL THERE THE DITCH PLANE ?TJ
> ithicaplasma said on
01-07-2008 at
09:06:
took some serious balls to fight in those things, hats off to the crew
> sapper228 said on
12-27-2007 at
03:15:
float it was on the botom
> chrisman02 said on
12-20-2007 at
17:58:
they were pretty d*mn lucky those things float!
> robbie5380 said on
12-19-2007 at
21:04:
NICE VID!! thanks
> NikitasGuitars said on
11-12-2007 at
07:24:
Wow, thank you so much for posting. Have any more like this? It was amazing to see how the water folded over the props on that ditch. I absolutely love this plane, my grandfather was the tailgunner on one.
eMule
games
software
videos
> Emule > Videos > War > World War II B-29 Dramatic Landings
