> sausagesnail said on
11-27-2009 at
21:32:
omg reported for swears :O
> gregjockca1000 said on
11-27-2009 at
20:49:
sausagesnail, the five o'clock train to chicago, dumb fuck. lol.
> sausagesnail said on
11-27-2009 at
20:45:
rides what?
> gregjockca1000 said on
11-27-2009 at
20:43:
sausagesnail, he rides it too.
> Maplebangeek said on
11-27-2009 at
20:26:
lol
> sausagesnail said on
11-27-2009 at
19:04:
tinymouse sucks cock
> gregjockca1000 said on
11-27-2009 at
07:19:
you know what's also true? tinymouse2 needs to be stabbed 15 times in an open public square. giggles!! that'd teach that bitch to speak.
> Maplebangeek said on
11-27-2009 at
02:52:
omg so true
> gregjockca1000 said on
11-26-2009 at
05:55:
is it?
> tinymouse2 said on
11-25-2009 at
23:45:
fair play
> gregjockca1000 said on
11-25-2009 at
23:17:
navaneet268, hey that's some sick shit! i like it! antidimensions and normal dimensions could collide to form zero dimension. lol.
> gregjockca1000 said on
11-25-2009 at
23:15:
tinymouse2, oprah is the most demonic force in the universe.
> navaneet268 said on
11-25-2009 at
22:39:
It was an extremely fascinating video. On the topic of negative dimensions, I'm unable to visualize an object with negative dimensions. Perhaps it would be something similar to "antimatter" (which I saw in the movie Angels and Demons), where dimensions simply "cancel out," although I'm not quite sure how that would work out. Maybe if we collided into a -1 dimension, our dimension would have 2 instead of 3? If anyone has any ideas, please discuss them.
> tinymouse2 said on
11-25-2009 at
22:33:
I see? I guessed you were being an idiot but since you wouldn't hear my original point how can we get back to it? Also what's oprah?
> tinymouse2 said on
11-25-2009 at
21:52:
By the language you're using it seems that I'm not the one who needs to calm down. Anyway what the hell is your problem?
> tinymouse2 said on
11-25-2009 at
16:16:
So I state what I think and you swear back, wow look at the highly educated man here.
> tinymouse2 said on
11-25-2009 at
11:44:
I'm going to respond without turning into an idiot who needs to swear over the internet to feel good about him/herself.As far as I know there aren't negative dimensions. Now I'm not 100% sure on dimensions but as far as I know the dimensions are just a way of perceiving certain conditions from a position that is unexplainable in the dimension below.Like I said I don't know much about dimensions but we can mathematically represent 0-11th dimension but no negatives
> gregjockca1000 said on
11-25-2009 at
10:57:
if there's fractional dimension, i think there should be negative dimension.
> IamDuhmb said on
11-25-2009 at
08:39:
If there is a negative dimension id probably mistake it for the 11th dimension:]
> gregjockca1000 said on
11-25-2009 at
06:27:
rfts88, including negative dimensional space. lol.