> cristelos said on
10-15-2008 at
03:37:
mi pussy is dripping
> 0016chickboy said on
10-08-2008 at
20:50:
lol cute
> DarkTemp0 said on
09-16-2008 at
19:41:
Hello. Did you try stacking images ? like recording an AVI then using one of those free stacking software available on the web. You might just loose that bluring ang get higher contrast and brightness. You could also align them with some of those software.
> 08cz2 said on
09-08-2008 at
05:07:
I wouldn't call that great pictures to be honest..
> MeSeeUTube said on
08-24-2008 at
09:46:
Focus
> jorowi said on
07-28-2008 at
18:39:
Don't forget that the "lens" on the digital camera acts just like an eyepiece. You could use a barlow lens but I found it extremely difficult to get images into focus.
> Maxsapd said on
07-27-2008 at
17:31:
Use a barlow lens?
> Maxsapd said on
07-27-2008 at
17:29:
No.. You need to slide it into a telescope focuser.
> fobgirl19 said on
07-20-2008 at
03:02:
One person mentioned better magnification using this, I'd like to mention magnification will be a trade off with clarity, by adding more focal length, its like using a Barlow lens which if you dont have could save you about 10$. I wouldn't add more then 2-3 inches to the focal length
> shonmixen95 said on
06-20-2008 at
05:37:
hay today i made one a webcam telescope. i useed all of the same things u used insted of the blue panters paint. i cant see annythign out of it all i can see is a blure and for ex. when i look at a dim lite of that bolbs color and its blury. whats wrong with it? do i need to shoot it at a distent object or somthing to see it clearly liek ur pics? plz tell me
> Angela79652 said on
05-28-2008 at
11:20:
YourLoveCrush.(COM) to find your secret crush! Totally RAD !
> 16XDVDLaserDiode said on
05-04-2008 at
20:19:
remove the IR filter of the webcam and see what no one else can see..
> lonesuk said on
04-12-2008 at
00:12:
does it work with National Geographic Telescopes and kids ones i love to try it but dont have a spare webcam!
> jians5 said on
03-31-2008 at
15:19:
I don't understand. How can the telescope do any magnification if there's no eyepiece? Especially with a reflector. Wouldn't you have spider vanes, and the secondary mirror in your picture? I'm looking to buy a ToUCam, or SPC900 to do this, but I'd like to know how it actually works with magnification.Thanks.
> Musick665 said on
03-17-2008 at
07:19:
Hey man thanks for the video, check out my video response.
> jakaul said on
03-11-2008 at
04:25:
Sorry mine is a refractor, not a reflector, Im a NEWB.
> jakaul said on
03-11-2008 at
04:04:
I gave it a shot with my logitech and 80mm reflector. The only problem is that the magnified area appears as a small circle surrounded by black in the video display. Other than that works fine. Mebbe its different with a refractor? No idea.
> hunterkillertank said on
03-10-2008 at
18:39:
Fucking class! Nice one man
> fingerhut6 said on
03-06-2008 at
19:35:
je101 is a moron...I AGREE WITH 40chevy400 this works perfect...
> ultimate007royale said on
03-05-2008 at
17:55:
iam confuse about using it what you do then after you connect with your desktop