Under the dark sky, shines the moonlight.Blessed by Satan, I dwell within depths of hell.Powers of the devil defeating the cowardly light.The throne of god shall crumble down.The earth will be a kingdom of demons.Where life and indulgence shall rule.Those who worship holy evil will be doomed.The white sheep shall be destroyed.Rendered to pieces by the claws of Satan.A black star shines over a mighty new king.The paths to hell are clear.The lord of the pit will rule!

whatever the demons say, whatever they do I WILL NOT FEAR FOR JESUS CHRIST IS MY COURAGE AND MY ULTIMATE PROTECTION.

Screaming and laughing they are dancing in your head.The angels arrive scorched by the flames of Satan.On Sabbath day from the ashes come the demons.They are our kings of blasphemy.Sabbath day is now demon's day.Now they are the true masters of your fears.Dark clouds have obscured the sun.The demons from Hell are rising in your mind.You may run, though you can never hide.Their Satanic dancing has attacked your puny brain.You can't escape, they are the kings of blasphemy.

"Eu ameeiii essa musica,de todas as melhores musicas gospel ki eu ouvir,essa é incrível!"Very Beautifull Forever.....

Likewise, when teen fantasy involves Twilight and Harry Potter, and Lestat and Stoker are forgotten, "we have a problem Houston". Web books are not going to save literature, badly written books like the Shack will not either, but when a Water for Elephants can still be written, there will continue to be prose excellence in the world.

By the way; I wanted to thank you, it's not often I can disguss liturature with someone on your level, around here the conversation barely gets above the latest teen fantasy.

Good point, it is that childhood of Lewis's that could only penetrate the silence of the planet, and interpret those fantasy sounds into escapism.

Other than the first, Baums works are on my list...Anyway; the biography I read spent a great deal of focus on his childhood, at that age imagination is a wonderful thing at to label the world he made as a copy of another would be unfair. Lewis's fantasy was an escape, Baum's fantasy was a charactorization.

I could have said Arabian Nights, but someday read Baum's series, you'll see. I have a first edition of Surprised by Joy, and most of his published works, so yes to your question.

=) I can see how you might come up with that, But I don't see how it's possible, have you read any of his biographies?

Hey, I liked the Cassio dig, but I would like to say I aspire to be Desdemona. I forgot about Narnia. I will say though I find them very easy reads and disguised copies of Baum's OZ series.

I think his sci-fi trilogy was mostly fiction with the exception of a few vague references to Earth history, however as most good works of fiction it does spark some interesting trains of thought.I wouldn't say it was the only one of that genre because you can't forget Narnia was intended as a children's story.XD If I am Iago perhaps you fancy yourself Cassio?

Pg. 137 Barbour edition proves my point, in the letter to Wormwood, False spirituality is discussed, and like the whole book, discussed in this fashion because of Lewis's belief his ideology is true. I would say his sci fi trilogy is his only work that is not argumentative or fact oriented. Maybe you agree Iago?

I would describe The Screwtape Letters as entertaining also, but I would say Lewis's satire is based on his belief his faith is in fact true, which is the case for most satire writers. to be cont......

Admittedly I have not read Mere Christianity, but I have read The Screwtape Letters. It was entertaining, but not argumentative or fact oriented. Thank you for reminding me of CS. Lewis's standing as a noted apolist, I was wrong on that point.Still wondering where Othello came into the argument though.

First have you read these two works? second C.S Lewis is known for his apolegetics apart from Strobel, McDowel and Craig. So why do you keep claiming C.S. Lewis is not an apologist?

Are even understanding what I'm telling you? The Screwtape letters and Mere Christianity were Philosophy and Christian living whereas Strobel, McDowel and the others you were previously arguing over are Apologetics. And what does Shakespeare have to do with any of this?

Hello nutjob, but you obviously haven't read Mere Christianity or The Screwtape Letters? So until you do, please do not question my comments. Or better yet, you probably have no clue what Othello is, so until you do, like I said, don't question me, or refute what I write.

C.S. Lewis was philosophy, not apologetics, that would be like recommending Charles Darwin as a study on physics.

Interupt all you want , Josh's books suck, I have read it. Try something else, but please not C.S. Lewis.