> buDDee3 said on
10-06-2008 at
15:07:
Lol it's funny, and this is in NO way a dis at your video because it was great, but it just seems that it's a bit funny that probably a lot of the views came from the fact that there's "Sex" in the title. Again, not a bad thing and not an insult to your video but I just thought that was funny.
> DagoBoogieMan said on
10-06-2008 at
11:31:
You are the best. Keep up the great work.I agree with you 100%.You should be getting an A in that class.(if you aren't already getting it)
> DagoBoogieMan said on
10-06-2008 at
11:25:
great movie..and good point
> JoshuaRahbek said on
10-05-2008 at
02:45:
This is soo nice xD I think you are really good at it :D
> markyjohnsmith said on
10-04-2008 at
11:38:
tinyurl . com / 5vdwv6 (delete spaces)bro paid me $10 to advertise thisplease visit the site! :D
> CreepyTom said on
10-03-2008 at
08:12:
Won't somebody pulease think of the children!I'm with you on most points. Specifically that, while cheap trashy portrayals of sexuality like in the Dead or Alive games has it's place, there is a need for a more mature look at sex and, more importantly, relationships. Where I disagree with you is that I'm not in a hurry for outsiders to start taking games seriously as an artistic medium. I just don't care what outsiders think. But that's just me.
> LOLAxXxOZZY said on
10-01-2008 at
16:03:
I like that you slipped James Rolfe's photo in there. He's like Siskel and Ebert for gamers, or the guys from "the Muppet Show".
> LlamasOnCrack said on
09-29-2008 at
19:38:
There is a thin, gray line between nerd and gamer. This conflicts with popular belief, but I agree with you that this concept along with the assimilation of videogame popularity will change over a span of time and there will be a new avatar for us to poke at. Which will probably be the MP3 commodity.
> frradrian said on
09-27-2008 at
06:31:
I agree he's talking about intimacy or "in-to-me-i-see"
> morrisgib said on
09-25-2008 at
15:37:
hahah very good, im very impressed. enjoyable and educational to watch
> onstot said on
09-23-2008 at
20:17:
I'm not a gamer but I still found this insightful and interesting. I had never thought of games as an artistic medium but it makes sense.
> kirithem said on
09-22-2008 at
07:19:
I'm more talking about intimacy between characters in the story. For all the "love interests" you find in games, intimacy is surprisingly rare. It's wait makes the innocent connection between Ico and Yorda so sweet. And you're right, establishing that empathy isn't easy. You can't throw a love interest into a game and expect that chemistry is going to just happen by itself. It takes some work, but results in a genuine relationship that is far more touching and emotionally stirring.
> Yamazaru90 said on
09-21-2008 at
11:03:
Actually I've seen quite a few people that want to be sexually intimate with characters in books *coughtwilightcough* it just doesnt make sense! why are games taking all the crap!? Ive seen more people reading "romantic novels" that are practically porno scripts than i have seen sex in video games
> B19Dav3 said on
09-18-2008 at
15:26:
That guy at the front looks like he's "seeing through time......."
> B19Dav3 said on
09-18-2008 at
15:18:
3:44 seriously funny!
> 64impalaboy3 said on
09-17-2008 at
17:55:
i don't really get it srry but i just play them for fun plus main games i like is gta, need for speed, call of duty, halo, n more
> GenericKen000 said on
09-14-2008 at
14:11:
Right, and one of the common failings of books is when they're unable to get the reader to empathize with the characters.Establishing empathy is hard enough with scripted narrative, but creating an interactive character that's sympathetic with ad hoc behavior? We're venturing deep into Pygmalion/Pinocchio territory.The AI tech is not there. AI characters that do generate empathy are either scripted or have compromised gameplay mechanics to make the AI competent. And gameplay should be first.
> RoyalRook said on
09-14-2008 at
13:00:
brilliant
> Reszo said on
09-14-2008 at
11:06:
I think he speaks of the intimacy you get with a fictional character, for example: when you care about the protagonist of a movie or book. Not the kind of intimacy you feel for someone else, but for someone fictional.
> filthymurpy said on
09-13-2008 at
16:27:
well made, well done