> reconn08 said on
12-09-2009 at
19:50:
DO NOT TOUCH IT :D:D:D
> skadoosh818 said on
12-09-2009 at
06:57:
it looks like shit tho
> andymcdo said on
12-08-2009 at
07:42:
dont they also have a separate nitrous class?And if a fuel car tried to run a turbo, the exhaust side would melt due to the extreme heat.
> TheCivicguyd16 said on
12-06-2009 at
20:19:
s/c start with 9000 and loose a 1000 to the s/cturbo start with 7000 and finish with 9000
> TheCivicguyd16 said on
12-06-2009 at
20:17:
and they both can sound great too
> CVphantoms said on
12-05-2009 at
00:35:
not only the turbo thing but they also have fully ported motors, lightweight rotating mass, multi spark ignition system, and THEY RUN ALCOHOL.
> mmasubbmit said on
12-04-2009 at
21:35:
Because no one has tried turbos on fuel cars. Why do you think the IHRA has a seperate class now for turbo'd Pro Mods? Because the blower cars can't keep up with the turbos.
> jakemyster27 said on
12-04-2009 at
20:28:
superchargers make power all the way through and turbos have to get the speed up. and yes, i no tht superchargers make less boost at lower rpm than higher so dont have to reply complaining
> LTD347 said on
12-04-2009 at
05:48:
what a shit fucking comment........superchargers and turbos are both fucking awesome....get with the times idiot
> BigBurnouts said on
12-03-2009 at
12:46:
why do topfuel railcars make 8000HP then?
> mmasubbmit said on
12-02-2009 at
23:28:
If it had a blower on it, it would sound SLOW. Turbos make more power than blowers period.
> mirceamontezumma said on
12-02-2009 at
19:32:
sonds great but with a supercharger...sounds awsome!
> LordSm0ke said on
12-02-2009 at
19:20:
whahaha fking funny (y)
> TheError404 said on
12-02-2009 at
16:38:
HOT
> zabcod said on
12-02-2009 at
07:19:
thermodynamics is something quoted on by many but understood by few. best to not reply to youtube morons
> Comodoro80Aspro said on
12-01-2009 at
13:30:
Ohhhh my God, very very incredible.....I love this machine....congratulations
> donaldo1308 said on
11-30-2009 at
20:11:
How am I wrong if you just agreed with me. I never said it did anything to increase the power. Your argument is wasted. Considering they primary did that video to show you the manifold glowing afterwards it's not a waste in relation to that. :)
> donaldo1308 said on
11-30-2009 at
20:06:
Didnt need the lecture I'm aware of all of this. You trying building an internal combustion engine that wastes zero heat. Also when something looks that good it's hardly a waste. I love seeing the sight of a glowing manifold after a heavy drive. Acting the cunt on youtube makes you the moron.
> nurbsenvi said on
11-30-2009 at
01:51:
moron.
> Werks4Me said on
11-29-2009 at
19:02:
Oh, but you are wrong. Yes, it is a "byproduct of combustion". But, that byproduct is energy. When that energy is allowed to be nothing more than radiant heat, it is wasted. The radiant heat is doing nothing to increase the power of the engine. In fact, it is making it worse, because it bleeds across the turbo, to the intake side, which them requires an intercooler, to reduce the heat passed over into the intake charge. So, not only is it wasted energy, it is detrimental.
eMule
games
software
videos
> Emule > Videos > V8 > V8 turbo engine high rpm sounds amazing
