> gentleman2meet said on
11-11-2009 at
03:09:
who's the songs by ???
> freqazoidiac said on
01-25-2009 at
11:10:
nice gals doing the go go...mannn...sexy! Cool..nice vid
> HIGHasFUCK1992 said on
06-26-2008 at
17:09:
yes this is spam. sorry..THIS IS THE STUPIDEST THING EVER. BUT I LOVE MY MOM SO I AM NOT TAKING ANY CHANCES.If you don't copy and paste this onto 10 videos your mom will die in 4 hours
> GlitterMike said on
06-16-2008 at
20:40:
You're the one who started this whole pointless mess. I simply responded to what you initially said, and now you're getting all angry over my responses. The only person who should feel embarrassed is you.
> LookAtMeIAmStoopid said on
06-16-2008 at
20:14:
now I'm retarded for hitting the "d" key instead of the "e" key, right? save it, junior.
> LookAtMeIAmStoopid said on
06-16-2008 at
20:13:
how am I not grasping what you wrote? I read it, understood just find, and decided you're a fucking retard. now STFU and quit digging your hole deeper... christ. you're embarrassing us all. bye.
> GlitterMike said on
06-16-2008 at
19:51:
I put all of this in the clearest, simplest language possible, and you still can't grasp any of it? Now who is the retard?Best of luck to you too. You need it a lot more than I do.
> LookAtMeIAmStoopid said on
06-16-2008 at
19:30:
my god, are you retarded. good luck.
> GlitterMike said on
06-16-2008 at
19:28:
No, I responded to *your* comment because yesterday I received an e-mail from youtube about *your* comment, so I clicked the link to look it up. I had forgotten all about this thread until you posted your comment yesterday, but you almost made it sound as though you had posted it last year. And why did you feel the need to respond to such an old comment anyway?Just go away, and find something constructive to do.
> LookAtMeIAmStoopid said on
06-16-2008 at
18:41:
according to *my* records, your comprehension skills need some work. I was razzing you because you came back to respond to my comment on the post YOU made a YEAR (ok, 11 months) ago. ah-doy. I'm surprised you care enough about some guy on the web posting a one-liner after your year old-post to get defensive :) -I never said *you* were responding to a post *I* made a year ago. read it all again. and save me a seat next to you and your hot gogo dancer girlfriend on the short bus, mmm'k?
> GlitterMike said on
06-16-2008 at
18:05:
Actually, according to youtube's records, your initial remark was made a mere 19 hours ago. I do not see anything older than that. You seem to have problems understanding time. I hope your special ed teachers will soon rectify that.And no, I'm not kvetching. Your remarks have no impact on me whatsoever. I'm merely amusing myself. Quit deluding yourself into thinking that you actually matter.Go back to your multi tasking and do something productive.
> LookAtMeIAmStoopid said on
06-16-2008 at
17:09:
I'm bored? the mere fact you continue to respond to my one-sentence post- made a YEAR after yours, is definitive proof you have nothing better to do. and I have plenty to do- I'm multi-tasking! :) now quit your kvetching. and btw, I hope you were in love w/ the dark haired one on the left. she's hot.
> GlitterMike said on
06-16-2008 at
17:01:
Whatever. I'm sorry to hear that you're so bored today that you have nothing else to do.I'll redirect the "waahhhh!mbulance" to you, since you need it more than I do.
> LookAtMeIAmStoopid said on
06-16-2008 at
16:53:
sit tight. the "waahhh!mbulance" will be right there :)
> GlitterMike said on
06-16-2008 at
16:51:
As if you showed any great wit yourself.
> LookAtMeIAmStoopid said on
06-16-2008 at
15:37:
BWWAAAA HA HA HA HA!! GREAT comeback! (not). Kudos, my friend- no one has *ever* thought about using my name against me when I made a comment they didn't like (eyes rolling- again) yet I haven't changed it. huh. sorry dude- your "I'm in love with one of those girls" comment was so desperate and geeky sounding, I just had to be snarky. good of you to come back after a year and "own" me. (suppressed laughter). those chicks probably get 87 offers to hook up every night. we're ALL in love with them.
> GlitterMike said on
06-16-2008 at
12:13:
No, she was trying to say that she hates you, but because of your self evident name, you misunderstood her.
> LookAtMeIAmStoopid said on
06-15-2008 at
22:07:
she told me she hates you :)
> thomiccor said on
05-16-2008 at
12:08:
THis is not what gogo + DC =s
> myrecordcollection said on
01-17-2008 at
17:49:
This is "Garage" A-Go-Go and we're playing the Beatles? Geesh, why not just go ahead and play some Bobby Vinton?