> TruthersAreRetarded said on
12-14-2009 at
23:34:
"The fact they were running the drill is not the issue, "BWWAAAHHAAAAAHHAAHHAAAAHHAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!It was your main fucking point.Go away, stupid child.
> TruthersAreRetarded said on
12-14-2009 at
23:32:
Still waiting for a link your document, talltatguy.You are on a serious loser here btw, as its not very difficult to ascertain what scenarios were being drilled for by NORAD on 9/11.Hijacked planes being used as missiles against targets, certainly wasnt one of them.Try harder troofie!
> talltatguy said on
12-14-2009 at
23:27:
The fact it was running was not the point my dense friend. You attack what the operation entailed. It en tales high level threats to American assets, via planes directed at targets of Value. The fact they were running the drill is not the issue, it is what the operation prepares the military for. You said it in no way accounted for planes used to ram buildings but it states it in its objectives.
> TruthersAreRetarded said on
12-14-2009 at
22:58:
Operation Vigilant Guardian is a well documented part of the NORAD drills happening on 9/11.You have a document that disagrees with testimony from those who were taking part and organising those drills?Then best link to it troofie.
> talltatguy said on
12-14-2009 at
22:53:
Are you that dense. The document refers to the planing for an the implementation of contingency for the attack of American Value Assets. It refers several times to the use of aircraft in these scenario. It refers to the use of planes to attack military targets. It speaks of planes used to attack refineries and power plants. I mean come on, they were executing this very operation the day of 911. How can you say they never planned for anything like this? You my fine sir are the Liar!
> papavalium said on
12-14-2009 at
22:47:
Wheres the debris? Planes are made from cardboard layers, wrapped in soda can aluminum. I mean what are you people really talking about here. Why did the landing gear appear in the inner rings, answer cause its the strong part of the plane. Ive seen pictures of the tail section as well, Also the easiest debunk is still, WHERES THE PEOPLE ON THE PLANES....conspiracy nutjobs say they disappeared.
> papavalium said on
12-14-2009 at
22:44:
NO FIRE. LMAO First of all that's retarded to say, obviously I saw fire on the day it happened. Second, unlike the world trade towers, the Pentagon had MULTIPLE FIREFIGHTERS fighting the fire. Why would there be smoke in all the pictures, cause there wasn't a fire?...lol It jet fuel burns forever and ever without being put out, it will melt everything, if it's put out, fires go out, hence no fire like you said.Remeber hoaxsters/conspiracy believers, planes are made of paper and coke cans.
> TruthersAreRetarded said on
12-14-2009 at
22:44:
I have read all about vigilant guardian, probably before you had even heard of it.NOWHERE does it mention hijacked airliners being used as missiles against targets in the US.Now you are just lying.
> talltatguy said on
12-14-2009 at
22:43:
I mean i took the time to research it, shouldn't you? Or is it that maybe you will read something that strikes a nerve you don't want struck.
> talltatguy said on
12-14-2009 at
22:42:
Did you read them? You must not have. I mean read more than the cover and a couple paragraphs. READ the document. I mean you payed for it, your tax dollars payed for the operation. CHECK IT OUT. Use your own mind, not mine.
> papavalium said on
12-14-2009 at
22:41:
So now, the terrorist used bunker busting bombs from planes that were never in the air, and the 56 people that were on that flights just disappeared. Wow that's a conspiracy right there."just ask yourself, where is all the debrie? Has there every be debris from a plane hitting the ground at 300-400 mph. What happened in Pennsylvania? First people say one plane got shot down, there no debris they dont care, now pentagon, where's debris. You didn't see the picture with the Tail in it?
> talltatguy said on
12-14-2009 at
22:40:
You know if you are going to fight someone on their point of view, you need to do YOUR OWN RESEARCH. I mean I gave you the names of the documents. You searched for this video on you tube didn't you? So run a few simple searches. YOU WILL FIND THEM.
> TruthersAreRetarded said on
12-14-2009 at
22:40:
Vigilant Guardian.Did you actually read about what those drills entailed troofie?No mention of hijacked airliners being used as missiles against targets.Why keep lying?
> talltatguy said on
12-14-2009 at
22:38:
I have nothing but respect for the millions of Jews whom Hitler Murdered. It is this type of militant Government that I am against. Our nation moves just a little closer every year to the same state the German people were in as Hitler rose to power.
> papavalium said on
12-14-2009 at
22:38:
Easiest debunk is, WHERE"S THE PASSENGERS then, did they disappear? Why did they find their DNA there. They found or identified like 184 people there, including DNA from the terrorists.Also come on people ask yourself, would that camera ever catch something traveling as fast as a missle. LOL They catch airplanes, not the other way around...You would of never seen the missle on the video, that clearly shows a very large object blurring by.
> TruthersAreRetarded said on
12-14-2009 at
22:36:
Wheres the document troofie?
> talltatguy said on
12-14-2009 at
22:35:
Operation Vigilant Guardian. Another good read is Project For The New American Century. That is if you want to read something that was wrote by the people in the administration at that time. It will give you an insight into what their mindset was.
> talltatguy said on
12-14-2009 at
22:34:
WHO ON GODS GREEN EARTH SAID ANYTHING ABOUT THE HOLOCAUST? Now what you are trying to do is associate what I am saying with another event entirely to imply I am anti-Semitic. Someone else implied that and never could equate one comment linking me to any anti Jewish statements
> TruthersAreRetarded said on
12-14-2009 at
22:31:
What document troofie?
> talltatguy said on
12-14-2009 at
22:29:
Then you have not read this document. It speaks of the possibi;ity of planes being highjacked and directed at certain American value targets. It spoke of the drills and interaction of the FAA and NORAD to coordinate response to such an event. Now, is that not the exact event that took place that day? You just insert "planes used as missiles"instead of" High-jacked aircraft directed at American value targets". It is a play on words you are trying and is the argument of the ill informed.