The NEW World Government which Obama will implement at Copehagen in Dec, one currency, one police force...and the end of our freedom

They reduced risks to a minimum-of course. The entire TV morning broadcasts were pre-fabricated, collapses included. To show the real events would have been a totally unacceptable risk. Also, to kill 3000 bankers/brokers/financial analysts would have entailed unnecessary risks and aggravation. This massive hoax has been pretty much exposed - what is left to uncover now are only peripheral technicalities. :O)Please go to septembercluesDOTinfo. Thanks for your good questions!

I understand you guys are trying to do good here, but why would they be willing to kill 3000 people but not willing to crash planes? Why fake the biggest part of your inside job, the part your basing everything off of? Why would there be fake images after impact or explosions and risk exposure when the buildings really were on fire anyway? Why so many stupid risks? This is not sarcasm, these are serious questions I would like answered. .

Amaing work, and when i show it to people they still dont belive what u have show us, Cant understud what logic runs in their heads, if thay even have logic! Thank u for all of ur work!

Anyone watch the Obama deception? Cant say its all true but then again I cant say it isnt worth a watch thats for sure I think alot more bout what is happening since this vid

I think Simons goal through out all of his videos is not to answer questions but more so to point out the many inconsistantcies involved with 9/11, and thank god for the likes of him, people who sit back and believe whats told to them is the cause of the real problems in this world.... in the words of the great Frederick Douglas "agitate agitate agitate"

SIMON SHACK FOR PRESIDENT :o)

That is an excellent question. But your question does not answer what is so entirely wrong about the footage that the video examines. It is just a question. Simonshack does not claim to be able to explain everything that happened on 9-11. Such modesty deserves some respect.

Well, this is an interesting point. It is natural (though by no means just or rational) for the burden to fall on those who doubt the planes story since the doubters are the minority view.

Who is telling you what to believe?

Let us think together on this a while. Many people believe things we regard as incorrect or implausible. But this does not make any of them unintelligent. Intelligent people can be tricked. It happens all the time. I'm sure you can find examples yourself of this.

Just trying to make sense of it. All I can do is open my eyes and talk about things with people. Peace.

Ahh the refreshing word of wisdom. Tis true, all a man has is his word and his honor. A man's honor outlasts his lifetime. Pity that most people cannot comprehend those thousands of years of knowledge and come newly arrogant into this world, mouthing off and talking back to the wisdom of the ancients. Good to know there are some still out there, like yourself.

How about you check Scotland Yard for their current investigation into the illegality of this war. Basically they've said that as well as many other laws - articles 6&7 of the Nuremberg Code are in violation and its illegal to be paying your taxes since 2001. Ignorance is no excuse for the law, so check it out and save that look of shock & being complicit, for when the truth starts to come out. I am amazed at the so many holes in the official story that uneducated or blind slaves just brush off.

why is it nonsense to seek truth? why do you feel the hunt for reality is not worthwhile? When we are all dead, as we will be one day, all that is left is what we did. I think there is nothing more important than a clean and honest legacy to the world. Please do not discourage this effort.

This was my very first 9/11 video analysis - i'm just keeping it posted for the record. Please watch my complete work on this channel, before making any hasty conclusions :- 911 AMATEUR part1-3- NOSED OUT- SOME BIRDSand if you will :- SEPTEMBER CLUES part1-8 (search youtube)

Video that has to be "zoomed" in on to see things clser always creates extra images. You are trying to point out that the "images" are cut & paste images or you're saying "what's this image?". Why don't you do something worthwhile with your "creative abilities" instead of this nonsense. Will you allow thisomment to be seen now? hmmm, we'll see, I'll check back soon.

Devin Clark's animation sucks as much as the average comment by a planehugger-I know dem planes was real cuz millions of eyewitnesses done seen em on da TV and my uncle's cousin's dogsitter's monkey seen it with his own two eyes from the crown of da statue of liberty and if you say he didn't then you hate america and should move to iraqipakinakistan

So right Hilary155. Using lunatics as cover is the oldest trick in the book. They are called "stooges" for a reason. Keep up the great work Simon.

You know... showing a guy wacked out of his mind claiming to have been abducted by purple aliens who forced him to square dance does not do anything to disprove the existence of UFOs and aliens. You cannot prove there are no black sheep just by showing a bunch of white sheep. I seriously think the government puts these deliberate wackos out there in an attempt to trick people into associating any questioning the official story with these loons. It is psychology 101.