> py1986820 said on
12-02-2008 at
22:32:
Well. militarily, A army massive in number does not imply it is invincible. They may strong in numbers, but in my opinion, they like persians, besides their numbers, few of them are real warriors with decent gears (how did you fully equip and train those massive army like Chinese army with limited resources?). they might wealthier than other nations during its time, but militarily... I honestly dont think so. Both spartans or Roman legions can crash them...
> limlynn999 said on
11-30-2008 at
12:25:
Why some statue don't have the heads
> limlynn999 said on
11-30-2008 at
12:22:
Why repeat the introduction person twice
> Chon1Son said on
11-30-2008 at
08:20:
Qin Dynasty is not part of Chinese history,watch my video
> HUNDREDSSHA said on
11-26-2008 at
13:46:
Haha,last time i saw a korean commenting here:Qin dynasty was not part of China history...haha koreans r really hilarious
> niamtxiv said on
11-26-2008 at
07:29:
South Korean? I am not Korean.
> rcsavage46 said on
11-26-2008 at
06:45:
niamtxiv, you are not a Chinese Miao, you are a south korean instigating wars between Chinese 56 minorities. Please have some decency and stop making wars. Chinese Miao have nothing to do with south koreans. learn some history.
> niamtxiv said on
11-25-2008 at
20:49:
You are pathetic. Chiyou was never a loser. No one was ever a loser in CHinese History. If he was a loser, his statue would not be erected beside Huangdi and Yandi. Chiyou was regarded as a hero as well as one of Chinese forefathers. Learn your history little boy.
> opeeum69 said on
11-24-2008 at
07:21:
roflmao hahahahaha, somebody was beating off when they made this retard of a video
> jdiddy666 said on
11-23-2008 at
13:18:
but without him , there would be no China. that is why Chinese admire him. he is our fore father.
> jdiddy666 said on
11-23-2008 at
13:17:
U GOTTA be joking.
> triggersots4686 said on
11-23-2008 at
02:04:
蚩尤天皇, haha lol wat a joke, you must be a korean.......
> sexyme123889 said on
11-15-2008 at
09:19:
QIN SHIHUANG
> sirrington said on
11-14-2008 at
09:56:
Not fiction, about 25% is fiction, becuase it ain't really historians that writes that stuff.I only wish is that history tells me the truth.
> AKim1217 said on
11-13-2008 at
20:19:
QinShiHuang are probably the biggest diaster ever lived,his laws was brutal i recommend u to talk more about Liu Bang, he's is a much better emperor, with a successful empire. For QinShiHuang, his empire collapse right about after his death. In my point of view he's only a great conqueror, but also a bad leader.
> AKim1217 said on
11-13-2008 at
20:11:
um haides2, in history i dont think there's such things as accurate and specialy chinese history. Some of the books about China history i had read are mostly FICTION. It's seem like u have so much to say about QinShiHuang ( read next post)
> lzueducn said on
11-11-2008 at
23:51:
Chiyou is only the loser in the Chinese history. I know you are Korean and please find the Korean stuff to verify your points. Don't use Chinese book to verify your Korean bitch.
> cloud0515 said on
11-10-2008 at
09:54:
闭嘴！请别说这样的话！
> cloud0515 said on
11-10-2008 at
09:40:
九藜在哪里？愿上帝保佑您，蚩尤的伟大天皇！蚩尤的伟大天皇万岁万福！
> haides2 said on
11-05-2008 at
09:06:
I'm a Chinese. And I want to Declare Some CommonSense that You may miss.Fistly, I want to say: Yes, there is some unrevealed truth about Qin-Shi-Huang, the first emperor.
eMule
games
software
videos
> Emule > Videos > army > The First Emperor: The Man Who Made China (Part 1)
Related videos (25) 
