> tubecritic999 said on
09-18-2009 at
18:45:
Eeeeexxxxaaacctttlly.
> TaiFerret said on
09-14-2009 at
23:00:
Thank you WMG for not letting me hear your songs so they don't get stuck in my head and I won't get to know them and I won't have to buy them, cause I'll never know if I like them!
> tubecritic999 said on
09-12-2009 at
20:10:
thanks but could you provide a link? this would be helpful, since I can't find anything useful on google
> DarkFox2347 said on
09-09-2009 at
22:38:
go to your account and hit my videos. Then go down to the video and hit appeal, (i think its called that) just pick the reason and post in the law word for word. Should un mute the audio shortly.
> tubecritic999 said on
09-09-2009 at
19:38:
so do I do this in a video or an email? a link would be helpful since I'm hopeless when it comes to legal stuff.
> DarkFox2347 said on
09-09-2009 at
00:18:
you have to post something about a agreement law, i had one on my old account since i can't fit the whole law on here ill post a link to my account, it shouldent be too hard to find. just copy and paste the entire law onto the appeal. it works with umg only i think? it was either umg or wmg. you could always find out by testing. anyway, good luck.
> tubecritic999 said on
09-08-2009 at
23:54:
sounds interesting, how?
> DarkFox2347 said on
08-27-2009 at
02:57:
nvm just checked your channel your not a troll. but im seeing alot of your videos music getting muted, i could show you how to get about 90% of music to be allowed if you want.
> DarkFox2347 said on
08-27-2009 at
02:53:
I'm hoping you aren't a troll but oh well even if you are ill post this anyway. I'd have to disagree with the 100,000.more importantly i remember taking a furry survey with I'm sure over 100k people who took it. meaning 100k people took the survey and you have to wonder how many don't know about it or didn''t take it. (they refresh the survey every few months.) i could probablyfind the survey if you wanted me too.
> tubecritic999 said on
02-12-2009 at
17:17:
I kno, but I don't have the original file, so annoyingly I can't edit it. might do with the annotations.
> Blazeofspikes said on
02-11-2009 at
22:15:
you might have said that in your video. but just to let you know that not every creature that is covered in fur is considered a furry.
> tubecritic999 said on
02-11-2009 at
17:48:
did I put that?
> Blazeofspikes said on
10-03-2008 at
21:17:
Not every creature that is covered in fur is considered a furry(or anthromorphic animal).
> Dirtracer117 said on
09-28-2008 at
23:56:
i simple thread called "wheres every furry from" it's on a 13-21 site. i will not reveal the site outloud becouse it has had few troll problems and if i say it here well... you know.
> tubecritic999 said on
09-28-2008 at
17:19:
btw, how did you find out that there are other furries in your area? because I'd like to find out how many are in mine.
> Dirtracer117 said on
09-28-2008 at
14:02:
i have to disigree about how rare it is to find a furry i live within bicycling distance of one. in fact i'm trying to find them since they left the site they where on. i live in a short distance to several other furrys
> tubecritic999 said on
09-27-2008 at
08:17:
lol. thanx.
> SicSniper4unreal said on
09-27-2008 at
01:53:
To be honest, I have seen a chicken drummer take someone's eye out, they said it was in the eye of the beholder, and I said the only thing inside the eye of the beholder is a bunch of veins and goo... onward to the topic however, Great vid :D
> tubecritic999 said on
09-26-2008 at
17:23:
godamnit! I just realised I should of also put 42 at the end!
> tubecritic999 said on
09-26-2008 at
17:09:
thanx. took me a while to think up the title.