> samibigboss said on
12-03-2009 at
07:36:
You're such a LIAR the estimated death is 584 it's not 40,000 as you claimed to be. Anyways killing civilians or innocent pp is wrong, but there're way more ppl out there who would do it under any pretext.
> armedforliberty said on
12-03-2009 at
03:44:
Fucking Jews. They would sell their mothers to the SS if it would help Israel.
> believerornot said on
12-02-2009 at
00:25:
But he is not giving an anti semetic message. He is simply asking people to look at the way the press deliberately edits the truth.
> imanglo said on
12-01-2009 at
20:21:
representaive press represents the looney left anti semetic scum who try desperatly to harm americas support for israel. just read the comments on this channel to see the truth about this leftwing anti semite!!!!!
> oliviasmithuk said on
12-01-2009 at
19:30:
and the terrorists arabs killing Americans...Fuck this video!! Its a load of shit, just like most of you NAZIS!!!
> libertyforpalestine said on
11-30-2009 at
23:06:
Dear Mr. representativepressI believe that the unfortunate thing is that the zionist Israelis own most of the media networks and newspapers in America, so they control and run it to serve what they want...And the public has NO IDEA, JUST LIKE THAT!!!!!! Not only that...The Israeli lobbies such as AIPAC have the biggest influence on the US policy AND the majority of the government are NOT AMERICANS!!! they are Israelis,yes they have the U.S citizenship,but they ARE SERVING THEIR COUNTRTY ISRAEL
> libertyforpalestine said on
11-30-2009 at
22:43:
The Zionist Israelis are OFFENDING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE OVER AND OVER AGAIN.....Why?? Well, uuummm because CANADA HAS THOUSANDS OF LIQUOR STORES, FRANCE HAS THOUSANDS OF LIQUOR STORES, why did the attack America!!! Because of it's insane support of a zionist ethnic cleansing state like israel...They are playing the public and treating them like fools........
> fuzzybollox said on
11-30-2009 at
19:27:
We know that, zionists know it, the world knows it and the Palestinians definitely know it, but don't expect this inconvenient truth to trouble Israel shills.
> halliburtoncrusher said on
11-30-2009 at
00:19:
THE JEW MAFIA DID 9/11/01
> akatsha said on
11-29-2009 at
10:47:
Arabs don't hate Jews. Arabs hate Zionists and there are big difference between those two terms. As a proof, many Arabs like the NETUREI KARTA Jews as they against Israel. Another thing Arabs themselves are Semitics more than most of the Jews living today. So it is not an argue to say Arabs hate Jews because they are Jews, or because the Arabs are anti-Semitic. It is alla bout the Zionist and the occupation to Palestine
> terrymanning1 said on
11-27-2009 at
19:09:
I think the reason for not continually stating the "terrorists attacked us because we support Israel" is the likelihood, from a certain brain dead minority inside the USA, of anti-semitism rearing its ugly head? Would that not be achieving exactly what the terrorists want? The persecution of Jews? I think most people are aware that Arabs hate Jews and those that support them, so this is a bit of a moot point your making.
> highwind8124 said on
11-27-2009 at
15:06:
There's a perfect rebuttal Bin Laden gives in this 2004 interview:"contrary to Bush's claim that we hate freedom. If so, then let him explain to us why we don't strike for example Sweden?"I've read three interviews/speeches so far from him. Nothing about hating U.S. freedom or culture, just foreign policy issues.
> highwind8124 said on
11-27-2009 at
00:59:
I'm obligated to begin viewing all of Bin Laden's speech materials. Since I am ignorant on this subject, I can't say more. I'll understand better once I've heard him out completely, and know exactly how criminally under or misinformed the media and government has led me/us to be.
> highwind8124 said on
11-27-2009 at
00:55:
I don't find the Clinton thing odd at all. When the leader of a country is having oral sex with his staff, that reflects on the whole country - which would be well noted by a Muslim like Bin Laen.Now, I'm no Bin Laden expert (at all), but it may be that someone translated and collaborated for him, which would explain why he never renounced the letter in any of his tapes.I guess it is dubious since the Observer doesn't explain how it got it. I'd like to know the misquoted verses.
> representativepress said on
11-27-2009 at
00:53:
"the Mujahideen saw the black gang of thugs in the White House hiding the Truth, and their stupid and foolish leader, who is elected and supported by his people, denying reality and proclaiming that we were striking them because we were jealous of them, whereas the reality is that we are striking them because of their evil and injustice in the whole of the Islamic World, especially in Iraq and Palestine and their occupation of the Land of the Two Holy Sanctuaries." -Osama Bin Laden, 2/14/03
> representativepress said on
11-27-2009 at
00:39:
The letter popped up on the Internet a year AFTER 9/11 years after bin Laden has made consistent statements which this letter contradicts. There are other odd things with the letter, a strange intro to the letter that acts like the motives have not been stated before! Also, lack of any other source that includes as motives either "debauchery of Western Civilization" or a "call for conversion to Islam of the infidels."And the thing about Clinton is really odd.
> representativepress said on
11-27-2009 at
00:31:
The letter was reported in a November 24, 2002 article in The Observer, in an article that cites no intelligence-agency estimates about its authenticity, only using journalists' beliefs that it is really a letter from bin Laden explaining the motivations for the attacks. Reasons to question the authenticity of this particular letter include:*a style different from all the interviews *a strange intro to the letter that acts like the motives have not been stated before. ...
> representativepress said on
11-27-2009 at
00:29:
highwind8124, thank you for having an open mind. Jason Burke, in his book "al Qaeda" (described as "the most reliable and perceptive guide to the rise of militant Islam yet published") says this about the purported "letter from bin Laden": "There is some doubt over whether the letter is actually the work of bin Laden himself. There are several Qur'anic references in it that are erroneous, mistakes bin Laden would be unlikely to make." p295
> highwind8124 said on
11-26-2009 at
21:13:
While I'm open to the possibility of it being a forgery, I find that to be, at this point, unlikely. It's congruent with the Quran. It makes numerous criticisms of the west that sound exactly the same as the ones that the most Muslim preachers make. He makes the criticism of support for Israel, lamenting the Palestinians.I don't see one thing in that letter he wouldn't have written himself, or see him making a video saying he didn't make the letter.You'd need to make a case for forgery.
> Mr12did said on
11-26-2009 at
20:24:
The majority of Jews have middle eastern genes since it has been a safe haven from persecution in Europe. Never has a Muslim nation persecuted the Jewish people as a whole, which makes the aspirations of Zionists to cleanse a Muslim nation ironic. Regardless of whether the USS Liberty was spying or not the United States has every right given the fact that Israel wouldn't be around without United States' support.