> Ki12B said on
12-06-2009 at
18:12:
no, he isn't
> SilentAsesino said on
12-05-2009 at
03:12:
is that serjs dad idk, who can tell me
> kevlonk said on
12-03-2009 at
02:22:
I definitely prefer this version of the video.
> x1scrasher said on
11-30-2009 at
16:56:
lol but there is like 6 chineese people in china :D so it would be a mini genocide :3
> MrGunbaby said on
11-25-2009 at
03:05:
its funny ... in chop suey he wrote the song about being mad at his dad
> Chaoshin2 said on
11-24-2009 at
19:30:
lalalall allal lallalal lalala la
> LliieebeSexi91 said on
11-24-2009 at
15:53:
hm mag nicht nerven aber bin einsam wer hat lust zu quatschen
> leipie23k said on
11-23-2009 at
17:12:
amazing song. love it.
> PrinzessinMotzkuh said on
11-19-2009 at
21:40:
Amazing video. Love it
> WeeFaolan said on
11-15-2009 at
18:29:
Genocide means a determined attempt to kill a certain ethnic group, but of course a certain number have to be killed for it to constitute 'genocide'. When the Hutus killed 800000 Tutsis, there was debate about whether to call it 'genocide' or not - although that was for political reasons, with the major powers wanting a moral get-out clause not to get involved in the massacre. (E.g. if it wasn't genocide, they wouldn't need to).
> kmartmask said on
11-15-2009 at
17:54:
Right........Thanks for supporting my point.
> natoroja said on
11-15-2009 at
13:32:
an btw i forgot to mention that if you just try to kill evry single chineese in just the uk for eksample it would still be a genocide beacause you tried to make a human "race" extinct in a certain part of the world
> natoroja said on
11-15-2009 at
13:28:
beaause a genocide is the atempt to kill an entire "race" of people, if you starts trying to kill evry single chineese in the world it would theoreticly be a genocide even if you just manages to kill 2 or 3
> jinkyu7 said on
11-11-2009 at
19:52:
cool art :P cool vid like the original one better but awesome serj is the best there is out there so inspirational!
> kmartmask said on
11-10-2009 at
23:45:
Noo, listen, the events of 1915-1918 are what we consider as genocide. I know that Armenians have killed Turks, and I accept it. It wasn't genocide, but I do accept it happening. I also know there was a war during 1920. But what we as Armenians are trying to get across is that the time period of 1915-1918, what happened to the Armenians, Greeks, and Assyrians was genocide. Now, I don't know as much about the Armenians that killed, so I'm willing to learn if you're willing to teach. Thank you.
> armandddd said on
11-10-2009 at
20:57:
ok... u lıstened to the wıctıms of turks???belevıe me ıf u see theır proven remaınıngs, u wıll understant what ı want to say....they were murdered by armenıans ın theır homeland....thın about it..:(( peace..................
> kmartmask said on
11-09-2009 at
23:47:
Haha well, dude, I don't hate Turks so much as other Armenians, so I can take a joke. But out of all seriousness, it was genocide. The man that created the term genocide, Raphael Lemkin, (I dunno if I spelled it right), had the idea of creating it because of what the Turks did to Armenians and finally came up with the word after having his family killed in the Holocaust.
> AnitaZelikson said on
11-09-2009 at
13:52:
Thank you!!!!It so great!I'm going tomorrow with my friends to do HUGE SKY on canvas together!!!Thank you!!!!
> armandddd said on
11-09-2009 at
13:37:
couse dude...thy r not turk ıf and when turks say we destroy somethıng beleve me u can not see ıt agaın on earth ..trust me..peace:)
> kmartmask said on
11-09-2009 at
06:48:
Err.... Then how is the Holocaust genocide if we still have Jews? How is what happened in Cambodia genocide if we still have Cambodians? How are the genocides that take place in African countries even today considered genocide if those people are still alive.