> anaksahirap said on
12-21-2009 at
15:55:
I don't have proof about gaining energy in splitting an atom because I had not tried that. Maybe I should try splitting your brain cells...hmmm...only if it was bigger than an atom. You almost convinced me that you might be intelligent enough until you opened your mouth...lol. Go do your research before commenting.
> StinkyCheese9999 said on
12-21-2009 at
15:23:
Your comments are ludicrous. It's as if you are claiming if X = 3, we can assume Y= 3 too without PROOF.If drilling for oil or mining for coal results in an energy source with positive results, we cannot assume bombarding water with radio waves will have positive results (net gain) without PROOF.If you can't follow the scientific method to prove something you are just a kook like those claiming perpetual motion machines work.This is boring, I have instructed you enough. Goodbye.
> anaksahirap said on
12-21-2009 at
11:25:
Next to the list: Cold Fusion. Go and research about this subject. Or youtube it if you like.
> StinkyCheese9999 said on
12-20-2009 at
21:48:
You have nothing. But we already knew that. What a shame it is, IF you really believed the nonsense you wrote, that you waste your time on YouTube instead of wasting your time pursing this magic energy rainbow you daydream about.Go for it sport, prove us wrong by doing it. lol
> anaksahirap said on
12-20-2009 at
17:07:
Start your research with Nikola Tesla. I don't need to do the chewing for you.
> StinkyCheese9999 said on
12-20-2009 at
09:11:
Tell us the college, professor, & physics textbooks you cite that suggest energy company conspiracy. You are paranoid and applying inapplicable logic.Energy is not mined, physical substances are mined.You have no evidence it takes less energy than released, are misapplying vague ideas without scientific method. I doubt you studied science at all to not understand this.Again, look at others' comments. We all disagree with you, even the process inventor never claimed what you do. Fail
> anaksahirap said on
12-19-2009 at
19:51:
If you do your own research and experiment to verify the conspiracy theory on energy technology suppression, then you will turn around. Your reasoning is verbatim to what I used to say to conspiracy theorist until I examined it further.By the way, you forgot to mention your degree major. I bet it is BS in Marketing.
> StinkyCheese9999 said on
12-19-2009 at
07:41:
Haha, you fail.I am a university graduate, and not only I but ALL the informed people on this topic posting, and on the internet, and in school, know it requires more power. Your thoughts are a joke and your attempt to insult could never work when all you have is a load of nonsense conspiracy theory about energy companies.Again, mining oil has nothing to do with splitting water. Utter fail even at pretending you are educated in physics. Ask somewhere besides Youtube, I await your slapdown
> anaksahirap said on
12-19-2009 at
07:05:
Obviously you only had a high school physics. Go and finish college first and do your own research and experiment. Then perhaps no educated people needs to convince you. Splitting water to H2 and O2 is just a form of mining. We do not need to use less oil to mine more oil. Comprende?
> StinkyCheese9999 said on
12-19-2009 at
01:51:
Nonsense. Mining oil and breaking water down into H & O are two totally unrelated things.It is not possible, until some miracle, if there ever is one which we cannot assume, allows a catalyst to result in far lower input power than possible with any technology known to man.So you either very ignorant and foolish, or just foolish for not patenting and using this magical non-existent process that you pretend makes it possible.Please just refrain from comment when you don't know something.
> anaksahirap said on
12-18-2009 at
18:48:
Law of conservation of energy is twisted by giant energy companies. Yes harnessing energy from water is possible, it is only a form of mining. We do not waste as much oil to mine for more oil. Greater energy is stored within.
> StinkyCheese9999 said on
12-15-2009 at
00:56:
The answer is no, the energy released is lower than the energy needed to produce the radio waves.
> fomalhaut86 said on
12-11-2009 at
21:13:
Right ... I wonder if the energy released by combustion is greater than energy used to power that radio - wave generator of his.
> ghostriderinnc said on
12-11-2009 at
19:06:
Poor guy passed away
> jhon1431 said on
12-11-2009 at
04:09:
what component or chemical you mix the water and salt produce hydrogen i do not believed i do it my self nothing happened.
> conceil8 said on
12-05-2009 at
11:13:
.CHRISTIANS OF THE WORLD DELIVERANCE IS COMING! Seal yourself with holy spirit! Be holy, Root out your eyes for causing you to watch violence and pornography, cut away your sexual organs that lead you to adultery, sodomy, fornication, masturbation etc. Drink muriatic acid for smoking, abusing alcohol and drugs. Slit your throat for bowing to idols such as flag and crucifix. Do not attend church meetings, end Christendoom, restore Christian unity [Christianity], no church, no division!.
> ThePresidentialTouch said on
12-05-2009 at
06:41:
Something I'm positive of is that the President can't know that the use of hydrogen by electrolysis has recently been perfected to conclusively produce completely thorough internal combustion engine performance in avarage gasoline and diesel engines using platinized titanium-based hydrogen generators, easily retrofitted to any vehicle with such type of engine. This is the way to turn heads at the Copenhagen summit, with hard science and proven testing by NASA back in the early Seventies.
> ncbookz said on
12-05-2009 at
06:36:
using solar power to make 1500 degree c flame is under unity? are you drunk?
> ncbookz said on
12-05-2009 at
06:35:
20 mega hertz?
> 32GaugeSlug said on
12-04-2009 at
19:27:
Yeah, what will happen is, he'll sell the patent, and an energy company will buy it up, and it'll never get heard of again. Fucking moron, should give the patents out.