> blkblt2dgree said on
07-25-2008 at
03:42:
The sexuality isn't there. The "swearing" is about kissing, and the "wilt thou leave me so unsatisfied?" really is that he wants to have sex with her. Don't see that. And the "Oh blessed, blessed night" isn't excited enough. This is just what I think should be done and what I am doing playing Romeo in a professional production
> tominator452 said on
07-04-2008 at
01:00:
Nice catch, haha
> darthzach said on
03-16-2008 at
07:22:
It also doesn't really help that the year was 1968, not 63.
> dancechick12112 said on
02-11-2008 at
01:57:
the reason we post comments is for constructive critisism. actually, i agree with hannedh, they make a good point. so instead of crying over the fact that juliet wasnt that that great, use that to ur own advantage. thats y were here commenting
> cutelilkat1988 said on
09-26-2007 at
21:01:
yes a movie has multiple cuts and retakes...this is live you dumbass...it is a play...obviously its not goign to be *as good* even though i think these two did a great job.
> martyraoul said on
09-22-2007 at
02:53:
So thou will ooooouuuu.... LOL OMFG (00:58-00:59)their getting a little kinky there... wooo!!! :p
> NotoriousPip said on
08-27-2007 at
01:44:
Everyone is entitled to their opinion and I'm not going to delete comments anymore. But when you post a criticism next time try to elaborate a bit and make it constructive rather than just "tries to hard, pathetic"
> HanneDH said on
08-26-2007 at
16:13:
That's not well acted, Juliet tries to hard, and its pathetic, The movie: Romeo and juliet from 1963 is amazing, all the actors are incredible.
> Happykid3 said on
01-14-2007 at
07:12:
The Romeo could be ALOT better, he was good, but no matter how good there will always be better.