> KevinMerck said on
11-25-2009 at
03:28:
In the real world, any collapse of building 7 would have been a partial collapse in the direction of the damaged area. The worst case scenario for 1 and 2 would have been a partial collapse at the point of impact leaving the rest of the building standing. There is no way on God's green earth that they could have collapsed at near free-fall speed through the path of greatest resistance without the use of controlled demolition. That would be *strictly impossible*.
> cantonear1968 said on
11-24-2009 at
19:39:
You're "facts" have been dealt with and dismissed. Several times over.
> cantonear1968 said on
11-24-2009 at
19:39:
6)Let me know when you have that positive ID7)Would like to know how this rapid onset is in comparison to someyhing else.8)Again, things explode in a fire; doesn't mean explosives. A 16 acre collapse zone from a 2 acre building is NOT "into its own footprint".9)Repeating yourself10)microsphers expected given the conditions. A 20 story building cushing someone can have a devastating effect on their body.11)Evidence of a possible attack; not on 9/11 at the WTCs at 8:45 am.
> cantonear1968 said on
11-24-2009 at
19:32:
1)Unless a more powerful lateral energy source, a building will almost always fall straight down. And they fell 60% and 125% longer than free fall acceleration.2)Explained by the building destroying itself3)Didn't happen. Dust cloud is ejected gypsum from the drywall.4)Things explode in a fire; it doesn't mean explosives. No first responders are on record today believing bombs were set off.5)45,000 terajoules of energy was unleashed. That much energy will eject things laterally.
> KevinMerck said on
11-19-2009 at
14:50:
By suing, I've forfeited the "$1.8 million average award" for a death claim I could have collected under the fund. Nor do I have any illusions about winning money in my suit. What I do know is I owe it to my husband, whose death I believe could have been avoided, to see that all of those responsible are held accountable. If we don't get answers to what went wrong, there will be a next time. And instead of 3,000 dead, it will be 10,000. What will Congress do then?- Beverly Eckert
> KevinMerck said on
11-18-2009 at
01:26:
Rapid onset of collapse - Symmetrical collapseSounds of explosions - Imploded into its own footprintExpanding pyroclastic dust clouds - Positive ID of Nano-ThermiteSeveral tons of molten iron - Rapid oxidation and intergranular meltingMicrospheres of molten iron - 1400 victims blown into tiny fragmentsEvidence of foreknowledge - Expert corroborationSum of Evidence = Controlled DemolitionThese are not opinions to be debated; these are facts to be dealt with
> KevinMerck said on
11-18-2009 at
01:25:
Destruction through path of greatest resistance at near free-fall Total building destruction - Complete dismemberment of steel frameMid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal deckingOver 100 first responders reported explosions and flashesMuti-ton steel sections ejected laterally 600 ft at 60 mphPositive identification of Nano-ThermiteSum of evidence = Controlled DemolitionThese are not opinions to be debated; these are facts to be dealt with.
> swsp69 said on
11-14-2009 at
06:10:
It´s too much for my little brain to handlehe´s just nuts... I said it!!! I feel better now...alright let´s keep on going... everything is back to normal.
> KevinMerck said on
11-08-2009 at
15:05:
Cantonear1968 said: "And if the back bone of the truther movement is high school kids then we all don't have anything to worry about."School kids are what brought an end to the Vietnam War and you should be embarrassed and ashamed for not knowing that.People who underestimate our children are the biggest fools alive. It's no mystery why you can't grasp the simple truth about 9/11. It'd been better had you remained silent, you have defiantly removed all doubt.
> cantonear1968 said on
11-08-2009 at
04:17:
And if the back bone of the truther movement is high school kids then we all don't have anything to worry about.And you should be embarrassed that this is the case.
> KevinMerck said on
11-08-2009 at
01:22:
Student Educates Teachers About 9/11 During ClassSchool Censors "9/11 Truth Now" ShirtWalking The Fine Line Of 9/11 In SchoolI hope this catches on big. Most high school kids have enough sense to figure this out, not to mention all the college kids out there.
> ou818bug said on
11-03-2009 at
04:57:
"We can't help but feel a little freaked out about this." "Yea, you're getting it." Looks like someone just woke up. Great vid. Will share.
> itsthecurrencystupid said on
10-30-2009 at
23:48:
it's about time people wake up... holy crap
> KevinMerck said on
10-30-2009 at
15:27:
This is a great idea and I hope it spreads like wildfire."A new club on campus addresses controversy with hard evidence; and the 9/11 Truth Club of San Diego City College uses science as the weapon of choice.""The goal of this club is to educate people on campus and to motivate them to spread the word about 9/11," Steve Fahrney, club president said."The club will investigate eyewitness accounts and forensic evidence that contradict much of what the mass media depicted of 9/11"
> KevinMerck said on
10-27-2009 at
02:44:
Many know by now that Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth has surpassed the 900 mark, (963) but the best part is that it's just the beginning.Some will say that 963 is a small fraction of A&E, but the truth is that it's far more than have signed on in writing with the official conspiracy theory. The FBl and over haIf the American people are also on board, why wouldn't they be? Demand a Iegitimate investigation now. If it wasn't controlled demolition, then what's there to hide?
> KevinMerck said on
10-21-2009 at
02:22:
Are you obligated to financially support a government that refuses to address the concerns of over half its people?Are you obligated to support a government that calls over half its people kooks and conspiracy theorists?Does Iegitimate, representative government ignore the wishes of its people?If you have a problem with this type of representation, it may come as weIcome news that you are not legally or moraIIy obligated to financiaIIy support it.
> cantonear1968 said on
10-17-2009 at
17:46:
Kevin, they received that form letter from the FBI back in 2008. How's it be going since then? How far along are the FBI in reinvestigating 9/11?HaHaHaYou loons are great!Oh and don't forget that 0.08% of licensed engineers are calling for a new investigation! What a huuuuggggeee number that is!!LOL!
> KevinMerck said on
10-17-2009 at
14:35:
'Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth recently received acknowledgement from the FBl's counterterrorism division, which concluded that the organization's core evidence deserves - and will get - FBl scrutiny. In a letter, Deputy Director MichaeI Heimbach assessed AE 911's presentation as "backed by thorough research and analysis.'- SiIicon WeakIyOver half the people want a real investigation, why wouIdn't they?If it wasn't controlIed demoIition, then what's there to hide?
> stimpyl said on
10-17-2009 at
13:59:
this is simple and obvious. people just can't accept that he gov would kill its own people.
> lowbrowrodeo said on
10-16-2009 at
08:37:
Because he calls for drastic measures and the majority of people like it as it is. Mindless spending.