> sreeharigirish said on
12-20-2009 at
10:03:
oh i want 2 kiss her navel........
> Ann8209 said on
12-18-2009 at
11:47:
i don't feel she is so as beautiful
> sureshabu said on
12-14-2009 at
21:24:
ayyo....how can u tolerate such nonsense.poor acting.the heroe doesnt have any expression in his face..heroine has turn on curves but no acting skills..Tamils have ridiculous movie sense...Subramaniyapuram is the only one good Tamil movie I have seen ever..
> gregorym2008 said on
12-12-2009 at
06:29:
looks like u were ass raped repeatedly which caused grevious damage to ur brain.. I'm positively accurate about this observation and I stand by it..
> gregorym2008 said on
12-12-2009 at
06:21:
yeah.. ur suckish.. attitude fits you right in as well .. since ur a sucking gay..
> JetBaller said on
10-29-2009 at
18:29:
This hero vijay looks like a cross between a rat and a bat.How did this ugly fellow even become a hero? Most tamil people are ugly as hell.
> evolvender said on
10-02-2009 at
10:24:
There is nothing accurate about your prejudice. The attractiveness of a language is a subjective trait, something your self-obsessed brain is incapable of appreciating. Tamil is a beautiful language with ancient roots and a wide influence. In fact, the reason you are here berating it's influence here is because you feel that your own language is inferior. It is morons like you who are responsible for much ignorance. If you cannot appreciate other cultures then you might as well kill yourself.
> Ravs023 said on
10-02-2009 at
07:07:
You ignorant asshole. Its a positively accurate observation and I still stand by it. Your pigish attitude is unattractive as well..and if you happen to be tamil, you fit right in.
> evolvender said on
09-26-2009 at
22:35:
What exactly are you talking about?
> JesterErick01 said on
09-22-2009 at
13:29:
I've seen much better chicks atcamsucker(dot)com
> ethicalstar1 said on
09-12-2009 at
20:18:
nambiar looks like a rapist.. : )
> LynnKoh12 said on
09-03-2009 at
07:52:
LAME
> nairstud said on
08-31-2009 at
09:45:
india's first 3d movie is my dear kuttichaathan and it is originally in malayalam later dubbed in hindi as chota chetan must have been dubbed into tamil also. get your facts right dear b4 commenting
> GodsOfWar666 said on
08-20-2009 at
12:08:
karkakr kar ka .. funy language.. anywys i like the girl.. wow how ugly the ctor is.. he looks like a gay
> anuhind123 said on
08-10-2009 at
22:15:
As far as my grammer, this is a stupid discussion on bollywood vs kollywood(tamil movie industry) not a discussion on nuclear disarmament or an english essay contest that i have to watch my grammer. Lastly the most hilarious thing about my being childish. you are the one who judges a book by its cover and not by its content. you're the one who judges movies by the looks of the lead actor and not by their storyline or technical excellence. your view is that of a juvenile sex starved teenager.
> anuhind123 said on
08-10-2009 at
21:36:
Have seen the Gajini's hollywood inspiration momento. If the movie had been remade as it is, it would have flopped. Indian audience are not sophisticated enough for that. It was tamil director murugadoss who rewrote it fit india audience( by the way he directed the hindi version too). Apart from gajini, sathiya is a copy of maniratnam's alaipayude. Maniratnam's roja and bombay were tamil movies dubbed to hindi. music sensation A.R. rehaman is from chennai. India's first 3D movie is tamil
> anuhind123 said on
08-10-2009 at
21:27:
As for as hollywood investing in tamil movies, time warner's warner brothers has announced that they will co-produce a Tamil film along with Soundarya Rajinikanth's Ocher Studios named 'Goa'. not only hollywood but bollywood production houses are investing in tamil films because tamil films have huge audience in japan, malaysia, srilanka, and many other countries. Infact famous indian actor in japan is not srk or amir but rajinikath. Rajinikanth is the highest paid actor in india.
> anuhind123 said on
08-10-2009 at
21:13:
cannot be compared to mushy , pretentious love stories that bollywood is famous for. I must have missed the news conference that all the directors, actors and movie studios of hollywood made acknowledging bollywood as the equal to hollywood. You must be making that assumption because big production companies investing in bollywood then the conclusion is wrong. They all want a piece of indian movie market . It has more to do with money than the quality of the movies made.
> anuhind123 said on
08-10-2009 at
20:58:
I agree that hollywood is the biggest movie industry and a pioneering trend setter. But i do not agree that each and every film industry must be compared to it to assess its worth. Each movie industry caters to different sets of audience and are culturally and linguistically unique. comparing them is like comparing apples and oranges. But if you do compare then Bollywood is cheap imitation of hollywood. The kind of trend setting movies from gone with the wind , ben hur to todays transformers
> mcherbboy said on
07-30-2009 at
21:57:
Well that might be because of the reasons people go to the movies in different cultures. Hollywood considers it an art; people go to watch it not only for entertainment, but also the art of acting. In India, especially Tamil Nadu, people go the the movies primarily to have an great time. This means a lot of the movies made have stuff that American culture would consider stupid, like random songs, comedy intertwined within the main storyline.
eMule
games
software
videos
> Emule > Videos > sexy > rambha - tamil actor vijay helping tamil actress wear sari
