> CptJackAubreyRN said on
11-24-2009 at
14:58:
Well, since you fail to acknowledge that NIST didn't even look for explosives that their findings are incomplete and therefore highly questionable.
> InternetUser1999 said on
11-24-2009 at
12:56:
And of course Islamic terrorists would never want to attack American because America has never done anything to anger Islamic militants like support Israel or station troops on arab holy land like Saudi Arabia so why would it be Islamic terrorists who carried out 9/11?
> MuckupAgain said on
11-24-2009 at
12:32:
...and you've neatly sidestepped having your assumption about explosives completely blown out of the water. It's clear to everyone that you've decided to ignore that issue and move onto another topic in a vain attempt to gain some points. Of course, you fail to comprehend that as no explosives were present, the collapse mechanism is irrelevant. Your conspiracy theory is bust.That said, i expect that you'll return to peddling your explosives idea in a day or so....
> mmmikkkeeee said on
11-24-2009 at
12:08:
LOL It's merlin and muckey (AKA Kneel and Bob, the Crisco Kids)! And why wasn't NIST able to explain the collapse of the towers? You've forgotten to tackle that question.
> Merlin5x5 said on
11-24-2009 at
05:24:
You can't teach a Turnip, MuckupAgain.It's just not capable of learning..
> MuckupAgain said on
11-24-2009 at
04:19:
"Why didn't NIST test for explosives in the rubble of the collapsed towers"Because hundreds of people witnessed two aircraft flying into the two towers, followed by huge explosions, clear signs of fires burning within the towers, video evidence of buckling of the external panelling (indicative of floor/truss collapse) and finally each collapse initiating at the impact site.The reason they didn't test for explosive: only a dumbass would believe that explosives were involved.
> mmmikkkeeee said on
11-24-2009 at
02:33:
Why didn't NIST test for explosives in the rubble of the collapsed towers? They later came out with the statement, "we are unable to explain the total collapse of the towers." Hmm could these two things be related in some way? I bet if they HAD tested for explosives, they WOULD be able to explain the complete collapse of the towers.
> sh0ckerturb0 said on
11-24-2009 at
00:04:
Did you guys know that the explosion of the death star was really an inside job? It's true, you sheeple.
> sh0ckerturb0 said on
11-23-2009 at
23:59:
Poll after poll shows a majority of Americans don't believe in evolution as well, but does the sNe portion of America go around catering to the scientifically illiterate? Hardly.
> MuckupAgain said on
11-23-2009 at
23:46:
"Poll after poll indicates that only a few Americans buy into the official story"Which polls would they be? How many is "only a few". And what aspects of the official story are doubted by everyone else?Of the 'everyone else', do they doubt that it was a terrorist attack, or just that everything was done by the government to prevent the attacks?Do you notice the difference in those two options? The precise nature of the doubt completely changes the perception of the poll results.
> littleredhead100 said on
11-23-2009 at
22:23:
Little impostor, your threats are being logged and you have been reported. Have the courage to post your hateful comments on here so everyone can see. Dont message me again.
> CTCADGUY said on
11-23-2009 at
21:21:
Then why not an independent investigation with subpeona power?Perhaps an international investigation separate from the U.S. Goverment.Poll after poll indicates that only a few Americans buy into the official story.Now with all these independent investigations finding thermate in the dust and on some stolen samples, the molten metal, WTC 7 and the rest of it coming out it is quite obvious it was an inside job.Who had means & Motive?Who had opportunity?
> CTCADGUY said on
11-23-2009 at
20:39:
Well Said - KudosYou are truly a Debunker Buster
> EvilSlyGuy said on
11-23-2009 at
17:30:
Where was all of this "inside job" talk back in 1993 when the WTC was attacked the first time, with other attacks of the 90's and since if it's the government behind all these attacks? Why are only people from ONE of the two major parties being blamed for it all if the government is responsible?
> toetruckjoe said on
11-23-2009 at
16:32:
Merlin Is a government shill.
> toetruckjoe said on
11-23-2009 at
15:28:
Bedlaka Is Merlin. I'm going to mark you down you shills.
> toetruckjoe said on
11-23-2009 at
15:28:
Bedlaka Is Merlin. I'm going to mark you down you shills.
> toetruckjoe said on
11-23-2009 at
15:06:
You laugh the same way? You can hear each other laugh?
> Merlin5x5 said on
11-23-2009 at
14:57:
No, we just laugh at you the same way.
> toetruckjoe said on
11-23-2009 at
14:32:
Merlin, little red head and toe truck Joe 1 are the same person.