> tsnaruto said on
11-25-2009 at
00:43:
You are a furry.
> HavokkDisposition said on
11-17-2009 at
21:27:
OP=1+ Internetz
> MaximumFailure said on
07-18-2009 at
15:11:
ITT cry moar.Your tears sustain me.
> docj121 said on
06-24-2009 at
05:56:
f@cking troll @sshole im not furry but your just f@ucking ingornit sh%t F^ck if you were any real threat then i be worried so go fuck your self with those furfags
> CalBro said on
05-02-2009 at
06:00:
ROW ROW
> HyperSonic9000 said on
04-16-2009 at
16:23:
I thought you meant.......Well, anyway, tens of thousands?? How many of you were there to recruit? That seems like you'd need an awful lot of people to recruit. Either that, or roll over, in which, the recruited start recruiting.
> bannable said on
04-16-2009 at
13:46:
Who said we recruited from 4chan?
> HyperSonic9000 said on
04-16-2009 at
01:25:
Okay, specifics please. How did you alone on 4Chan manage to stir up that many? I'd say such a bold claim deserves some evidence to go with it.Anyway, thats still peanuts compared to WW2. In WW2 the Allied forces alone had a count of 109,750,100 via manpower. Forum wars are nothing compared to what WW2.
> bannable said on
04-15-2009 at
23:35:
It was far more than a couple of sages. It was literally thousands over the course of the project, maybe even tens of thousands.I made sure any time any one of the PN saw a furry thread, it was bombed.
> immuki said on
04-03-2009 at
05:51:
i believe there is a term for this....? "1337 h4X" maybe?
> hazardous1990 said on
03-15-2009 at
22:50:
Yiff in Hell Furfags.
> DontFilmYourTV said on
03-10-2009 at
03:04:
I had no idea that furries were such a problem! Though I am STRONGLY against hacking and spamming, I guess this is for a good cause. LONG LIVE THE PATRIOTIC NIGRAS!
> HyperSonic9000 said on
02-28-2009 at
04:19:
Lol in order for it to be WW2, you'd need more organization than what happens on /b/. A couple of sages don't necessarily count as a nation/army. Maybe furfags in some way, but that's becuz they're militant and make it srs business. As far as bombs goes, shit is still controversial. Some would argue their neccessity. I'm on the fence. And yeah, /b/ mods suck. Too bad they don't get off their asses and do something about it. A board of their own might not be such a bad idea.
> kljhokj said on
02-28-2009 at
02:53:
Did you really just compare /b/ to WW2?Also - if all bombs went away, the world would be a better place. Get better /b/ mods imo, or let the furfaggots have their own channel *shiver*.
> HyperSonic9000 said on
02-24-2009 at
21:43:
Not all sages are the same though. That would be like saying using bombs in general is bad because the Japanese bombed us at Pearl Harbor. Some of it is necessary.
> ultrastripper said on
01-06-2009 at
00:53:
I've gone ahead and understood it. I still hate it :)
> kljhokj said on
01-01-2009 at
08:50:
See, here's the thing... I hate furfags...But sage bombing is the most irritating, fucking stupid shit I've ever seen. I'd rather see every third thread be furfaggotry than have to sift through your retarded "Fighting the powah"...Maybe if you ONLY sage bombed furry shit...
> hkkorly said on
12-31-2008 at
23:30:
I left for other *chans, where furry posts are instantly b& on sight. But it still sucks.
> zarconeus said on
10-18-2008 at
06:47:
RULES 1 AND 2.
> RyuDarragh said on
09-02-2008 at
10:52:
Hehe.. thankee, thankee.. been on the intertubes since it was done with strings and always something new/old comes along and makes me go "WTF?".
eMule
games
software
videos
> Emule > Videos > anonymous > Operation: Sage/b/omb
