> elchiringui said on
07-28-2009 at
17:33:
Great!!!!
> vampirebasileia said on
07-28-2009 at
16:26:
I read on this on Yahoo Spain... Seems a grat production!! Good luck!!
> spikaia said on
07-19-2009 at
05:40:
i just read about this film in Yahoo Argentina, so even though i dont like zombie movies, kudos for making a movie with such a low budget which everyone is talking about
> matheusmg said on
07-09-2009 at
05:00:
foi parar em cannes!HUAHUAHUAUHAi'm brazillian and u're famous!GRATZ!
> kulemv said on
06-21-2009 at
14:21:
0:40 lawl howie scream
> KojiRecords said on
06-06-2009 at
19:30:
Why are you hataz up in here bagging on this movie? It looks cheap, bloody terrible, blah-blah-blah---you hataz are the same ones who will continuously plunk down good money and see a multi-million dollar movie bomb and say it is okay afterward. Fact: like it or not, Colin has done more in a short period of time and for a hell of alot less money than the filmmakers ever dreamed. The film trailer even delivers the goods. So don't be hatin' up on Colin like y'all some damn film critics.
> Cirac1 said on
06-06-2009 at
18:06:
Your all rather retarded if you think this is a flop? If you had 45 pounds and manage to make a film with this much hype and press, ill say your entitle to your opinion, but right now, your just a pissy nay-sayer. I think its amazing that they've manage to make a film like this on such a small budget! Well done guys! a big fan!
> ussixtysix said on
06-03-2009 at
06:09:
zombies! Always more room for zombie movies.What were you doing while this film was being made?Something cooler than this?NOWellShut up
> colamonstrosity said on
05-28-2009 at
18:52:
okay, getting the hype for being cheap.
> supermansamuel said on
05-27-2009 at
18:22:
Lol... SusPENISful! :3
> redmartian said on
05-25-2009 at
17:08:
ohai 'n tnx1.0e6! I just thought my video player was buffering.Its like 'show the whole frame!' so it didn't build suspense justsome suspicion. I'll take my computer to the shop and see ifthe tech can get the video trailer to be more suspenisful.
> supermansamuel said on
05-25-2009 at
16:31:
... omg are you joking.Im going to save you the time and knowlage... it was MENT to happen.Loads of film makers use that technique to build up tension and suspense
> supermansamuel said on
05-25-2009 at
16:28:
Its british... and they did spend £45 cuz it was in the newspaper for being so cheap to make
> hakon312 said on
05-25-2009 at
01:49:
so much hype already. looks bloody terrible. but the engine will work, and a producer with backing will take it up. and in a few summers we will have yet another colossal waste of time that will, by that point only be $15 to see in a theare
> NonPhixion1987 said on
05-24-2009 at
23:58:
ok yeah that's pretty cool.
> TheArdentPoet said on
05-24-2009 at
23:31:
It's shot from the zombie's perspective.
> NonPhixion1987 said on
05-24-2009 at
20:18:
I'm sorry but this looks like every other zombie movie but a lot cheaper. What am I missing.
> mdpocoroba said on
05-24-2009 at
16:03:
Don't forget that time is money, and there is the matter of 18 months involved in production and all the staff and cast were working for free but that doesn't discount the fact that their time had to have some value to be accounted for.
> KungFuKing166 said on
05-24-2009 at
11:36:
The point is that these people had this equipment already, so it would be like borrowing. So the statement stands. If the creator of the film had asked everyone to go and buy cameras etc, then yeah the film would technically have cost more, but he basically asked them to use what they already had. It does happen a lot in movies. Some stars have worn their own clothes before because the wardrobe dept couldn't find clothes to fit them
> RabbitPunching said on
05-24-2009 at
05:11:
actually, it is very accurate, the director has smarts, used what he had, and was lucky to secure other vital materials for his film.