> AstralPlaner said on
12-01-2009 at
01:39:
Who said explosives?Thermite is quiet.Former Major General of U.S. Intelligence knows this is all a dupe.So why don't you?If the Pentagon is so cut and dry where is the photographic evidence? There were a LOT of cameras shooting that direction....so where are the images?They conceal the facts, secure all the camera shots then spin some fairy tale that you are more than willing to gulp right down.Scary thought......
> 911insidejob81 said on
11-30-2009 at
20:40:
Why real "terrorists" ( USA elite, CIA) wanted 9/11 terror acts?* to round constitutional rights with anti terrorist laws ( Homeland security, Patriot act, Real id)*invade Iraq for oil *invade Afghanistan for oil and pipelines * big corporation interests in gun trade and chaos in Iraq and Afghanistan.* turn USA in police state ( laws controlling "terrorists")terrorist in their thoughts are free US citizens Real id coming to us!search youtube for "Real ID" and "Fema concentration camps"
> 911insidejob81 said on
11-30-2009 at
20:37:
"Operation Northwoods" in 1962 was a plan by government to stage acts of real terrorism on US soil and against U.S. interests and then put the blame of these acts on Cuba in order to generate U.S. public support for military action against the Cuban government of Fidel Castro.Kennedy did not approve it in 1962.Bush did in 2001. 9/11 inside job.It is in wikipedia!!! google "Operation Northwoods"
> 911insidejob81 said on
11-30-2009 at
20:36:
wtc7 collapsed on September 11th at 5:20 pm. It looked like controlled demolition!And it was!!!!If it was controlled demolition than they knew about 9/11 before it took place.It takes days to plan and prepare for controlled demolition. ( not 8 hours)
> KevinMerck said on
11-29-2009 at
15:58:
There's no question in my mind that there's enough evidence to justify a very comprehensive and hard hitting investigation of a kind that we've not seen, with subpoenas, general questioning of people, and raising the release of a lot of documents, there's no question that very serious questions have been raised, about how much they knew beforehand and how much involvement there may have been. - Daniel Ellsberg
> rohnmoosh said on
11-29-2009 at
05:28:
Open your eyes .
> BrickUnit said on
11-28-2009 at
22:29:
your government is trying to kill you
> jeffmay1 said on
11-28-2009 at
20:51:
Marvin couldn't care less about this wack, why would he?
> jeffmay1 said on
11-28-2009 at
20:50:
Proof of FEMA camps, haha, I see you use the word proof pretty loosely, you should really look up the demolitionSmoke was rising from the street because there were many fires on the street cause from falling debris, including many cars on fire and exploding, all well documentedMarvin Bush was NOT in charge of security at WTC like Gage claims here. He just proves that he is a conspiracy theorist instead of just sticking to the science of why he says he's therePURE CRAP AND LIES!!!!!
> jeffmay1 said on
11-28-2009 at
20:40:
Explosives NOT found in 9/11 dust. What a blatant lie!WTC7 does NOT have the 10 key features, he conveniently leaves out that demolitions charges make NOISE, lots and lots of NOISE, heard from miles awayNo strange events leading up to 9/11The hole in the Pentagon fits the plane perfectly, including the damage the engines and wings did to the wall and generator as it went inHaha, currency symbols? Now that is crack pot proofNose through south tower? So you're a no planer? haha
> aaronecolyer said on
11-28-2009 at
20:22:
and dont take his words out of context... we were told that planes hit the building, we can clearly see planes hitting the buildings... he is not saying that planes didnt hit the buildings....
> aaronecolyer said on
11-28-2009 at
20:21:
I cant believe it either, though I dont think he did the best job presenting the case... the truth is coming out, slowly, but it is coming out... keep getting the word out, and stop calling it a "conspiracy theory" call it what it is a "scientifc theory"
> aaronecolyer said on
11-28-2009 at
20:18:
Larry Silverstein went on PBS and said he ordered firefighters to "pull" WTC 7, so we know that there were controlled emolitions in WTC7 already... it doesnt take an engineer to see what happened on 9/11, just take another look at it, and use as many different sources as possible, this is too important to be hurling insults at people. I am a Marine Corps Veteran, and college educated, this does not make me an expert, but I am convinved that 9/11 was an inside job.
> jeffmay1 said on
11-28-2009 at
20:10:
I just watched a video of someone using a candle to prove the gov't planned 9/11.Another video has Gage explaining that bldg 7 could have been wired up for demolition during it's construction in the 80'sAnd KevinMerck who posted just below, claims the proof is the pyroclastic flows, despite the fact that pyroclastic flows would have fried everyone on the streets to a crisp.Only nuts believe this stuff, so I guess the theories coming from nuts are bound to come across as nuts
> mille113 said on
11-28-2009 at
09:46:
This guy's credibility went out the window when he said: "we were told that the planes hit the building."...He supposedly is an architect not a structural engineer... there are a 100 engineers to every pinhead like this to refute this junk.
> matthew54555 said on
11-28-2009 at
04:30:
so exactly who was it that tried to blow up the towers the first time?, who was it that tried to sink the USS Cole?...why is it so hard to realize that they attacked again, and were very successful
> thearmin said on
11-27-2009 at
23:23:
Hire bodyguards fro Richard Gage??He is brave and lucky that Marvin Bush doesn't kill him. a True patriot.I can't believe they let this on TV. Fox even? Unbelievable.
> drunkmick27 said on
11-27-2009 at
08:02:
if it aint super dick gage! the only man on earth who recreated the towers using cheerio boxes!
> aaronecolyer said on
11-27-2009 at
07:03:
so what do we do now? seriously... I am nto talking about week ass videos, etc... seriously and poractically what do we do now?
> KevinMerck said on
11-27-2009 at
02:38:
WTC 1, 2, & 7 were controlled demolition, that's a fact. Think about this ...Horizontal ejections of multi-ton steel sections up to 600 ft at 60 mphAsymmetrical damage resulting in symmetrical "collapse""Collapse" at near free-fall accelerationPositive identification of Nano-ThermiteTons of molten iron under all three structuresTemperatures well above those possible in a hydrocarbon fire