> scbluesman13 said on
09-29-2009 at
21:53:
I found the video I was looking for. It's a 70 minute documentary that was done by "loose change" productions I believe it's called. It goes through each aspect of the attack and pinpoints inconsistencies in each of them. Very informative!
> astrojeet said on
09-29-2009 at
16:30:
i mean there was no* evidence of a plane hitting the pentagon
> astrojeet said on
09-29-2009 at
16:30:
i mean there is no* evidence of a plane hitting the pentagoo
> astrojeet said on
09-29-2009 at
16:28:
yeah thats right!there is evidence of a plane crashing thereand the governments agents there cleared up all the little bit of debris left there. So, literally all evidence were covered up.the more u investigate on the truth about 9/11things will become clearer im sure about what really happened
> scbluesman13 said on
09-27-2009 at
12:43:
Maybe someone could point me in the right direction for this other film I saw on youtube that did some very convincing analysis on the craft that hit the pentagon. Given the debris that was left behind, the trajectory it would have had to have been traveling before impact, and the low noise disturbance it was theorized to have been a military drone plane of some kind. Has anyone else seen or heard about this?
> BranPHILhop said on
09-16-2009 at
21:01:
hmm they would of had to thought how will we get Thousands of FBI agents, Firefighters, Demolition experts, scientists, CIA, Rescue workers, police, airline pilots, NSA, Majority of the house of representatives, air traffic control, high-level military contractors, and the entire bush administration to keep it a seeecwet?? 0_o
> cheesychuffchips said on
09-16-2009 at
19:17:
apperently the planes that was used, was millitary planes, not planes from any airport
> mimmms08 said on
09-14-2009 at
19:17:
know 1 will eva forget this i hav respect for america
> xXxSkiLarxXx said on
09-14-2009 at
17:35:
2 thumb down becouse ur pobably saying the truth... americans dont want to know the truth (almost al)in some footages u can crearly see explosion on wtc u have a good comment and that is what i believe that happned
> xxpoisenandkissesxx said on
09-11-2009 at
16:49:
"americuurr, fuck ya!!" sorry, i love team america lol.
> AZDACKSGaming said on
09-10-2009 at
06:45:
I think there were people that worked at airports or worked with the WTC that has something to do with this. We all know that 4 planes did crash and people did die but someone not the US Government had to help, maybe someone planted bombs in the WTC but who knows I sure wish that the United States Government killed there own people for no reason.
> analyzingfunny said on
09-08-2009 at
20:28:
Was there even a plane? it sounded like a missle to me.
> KevinMerck said on
09-05-2009 at
01:58:
"South Tower Smoking Guns (follow-up)"A must see for truth seeker, skeptic and stooge alike. It substantiates the use of nano-thermite and explains why debris being blasted out by the demolition sequence is falling faster than the freefalling building.Be a patriot, not a stooge, by supporting a full-scale, multi-national, independent investigation of the crime of the millennium. If it wasn't controlled demolition, then there's nothing to hide.
> djveras said on
09-04-2009 at
12:08:
lol, it's like an idiot convention on this page
> fengineer08 said on
09-02-2009 at
15:30:
Do you like being a liar?
> 911TruthVideos said on
08-08-2009 at
00:36:
I agree
> tube2a said on
08-07-2009 at
17:36:
it was an airplane, commercially altered unmaned plane... lets not get ridiculous people, we all know this was an inside job but to say there wasnt a plane distracts people who think the original story is true from teh true issue.
> diskpanic said on
08-01-2009 at
21:30:
/watch?v=yfJoEcAPLcEVideo of the second plane.
> diskpanic said on
08-01-2009 at
21:28:
Superman after a bad night. Oh oh, no, better. It was HANCOCK!
> DINGLEtheBERRY said on
07-07-2009 at
21:59:
ive never seen that one. that looks fucked up for an airplane.