> burgersforreal said on
12-04-2009 at
03:57:
lol at 9:13 you can just see on jasons face that he knows hes getting schooled lol
> Mattman003 said on
11-22-2009 at
08:17:
It was very nice for Mark Roberts to come on and school these retards. Just the fact that he even took the time was very generous...they should be thanking him.
> andylinnen said on
11-12-2009 at
01:34:
Wow all in the same clothes as last week?
> ScotlandMaleGlasgow said on
10-29-2009 at
12:57:
There is without a doubt a shadow government
> Smoothisher said on
10-27-2009 at
04:22:
Because focus has to be put on one thing at a time inorder to get some ground. Either the pentagon wasn't hit by a plane or the towers weren't due to the explaination of the "eyewitness" at the pentagon that said, "the wings folded back" because that is what will happen in a plane crash their not strong enough to withstand the density of the building right? But they sure left one hell of a mark on the steel skyscrapers. One of these stories is a lie so tell us which one is.
> GeorgeBushLicker said on
10-24-2009 at
22:37:
9/11 has to be an inside job because I was in the Pentagon and didnt see any planes, what I did see was a bomb and it blew me up and I am dead
> Smoothisher said on
10-24-2009 at
01:19:
I understand what you mean. The govt. fucks us over often so I wouldn't be suprised if they wrote the mythbusters book for those guys.
> jabeeni said on
10-22-2009 at
19:03:
@smoothiser - All that tells me is that the two boys have a moral standard in believing we should not have to pay a price for the truth - especially when its implications are so massive and affect us all.It also tells me that by selling 'mythbusters', Mark Roberts and PM try to fix the *mistakes* which were made and *caught out* in the official story. Now I wonder how much the govt pay them for that?I also wonder how many sheeple have actually BOUGHT the bullsh**t they SELL.
> Smoothisher said on
10-19-2009 at
10:48:
I just want to say who do you get behind if you know nothing? On one side you have a couple guys who went out did some research and just tried to spread the word for FREE. On the other you have a bunch of guys trying to disprove the other guys "myths" by SELLING their books. I put that in quotes because a myth is a traditional story accepted as history; serves to explain the world view of a people. This is the definition of myth and these guys film is in no way that.
> ifurn0 said on
10-19-2009 at
06:10:
Ha! Too bad Mr Harriet isn't a truther. He's a scientist. He doesn't live in the US but he obviously cares for it more than you.
> ifurn0 said on
10-19-2009 at
06:00:
LC & other films are just saying that there needs to be a new investigation.So, let there be one. Let's have the truth.
> camreeno360 said on
10-08-2009 at
05:54:
9/11 was an inside job. Anyone who thinks a 757 flying over 500mph made a 16-foot hole on the side of the Pentagon is stupid. Oh whoops, I forgot, Harry Potter was on the scene and he made the twin engines, the bodies, and videotapes disappear.
> jaguarclaw said on
10-07-2009 at
08:41:
The big problem with Mark Roberts argumennt is that paint tests done on WTC steel shows a maximum steel temperature of 300 C. There is no evidence that the steel reached the critical temperature to loose its strength.
> Physman2011 said on
10-07-2009 at
00:57:
Just as I suspected you don't even live in the United States ....so please butt out.
> Physman2011 said on
10-07-2009 at
00:55:
"....and we'll shut up..." -GlenmeadHow about you just shut up? I'm done with you....think I'll go debate a flat earther (it's more productive).
> Glenmead said on
10-06-2009 at
15:09:
The NIST investiagtion has been taken to pieces and shown up for the joke that it is...you can even see them in a press conference trying to explain their lies
> Glenmead said on
10-06-2009 at
15:07:
Well show the CCTV footage of the hundreds of cameras that allegedly took it and we'll all shut up...That one image doesn't prove shit..Nothing to hide, nothing to fear.
> Physman2011 said on
10-04-2009 at
16:12:
I'm amazed to see anyone still backing the no plane hit the pentagon argument ....not even Dylan brings this falsehood up anymore. As with many other claims from the orgiginal loose change (pods attached to planes, etc) this one has been dropped...the truthers have new line for us...thermite.
> DomingoHMaCoolstein said on
10-04-2009 at
01:33:
"no one said they saw the plane there"There were over fifty witnesses that saw a plane hit Pentagon. No one saw a missile or a global hawk.
> Dynamicdj said on
09-27-2009 at
17:08:
the no plane was refering to flight 93. and the wings would have broken off because they will not defeat steel and slice right through them like butter. the plane didnt even blow up till inside the tower. its like there was no wall there and just a hole for the plane to go into. im sorry but this is IMPOSSIBLE. you will never see that happen again, or will you see a building fall like that. NEVER
eMule
games
software
videos
> Emule > Videos > WTC7 > Loose Change Debate 911 Program 2 Part 1
