What you fail to understand is that these exercises are not MODELS OF FIGHTING. They are EXAMPLES of principles being executed. If I obey these theories and principles, they can be applied to any situation. My attack and defense will not look like what you see in these sequence of movements. I'm very open minded. However, I have a hard time understanding or communicating with someone who tells me what MY ART is when he/she has never practiced it. Best of luck.

Sounds to me like your a closed minded blind man. GOOD LUCK IN A REAL STREET FIGHT WITH MULTPLE ATTACKERS WITH HAND WEAPONS ,BUDDY-- HA,HA,HA, KISS YOUR ASS GOODBYE!!!!!!!!!!

Now James , thats an educated remark or retort with no malace and your martial spirit evident .N

They do teach trapping and parrying. But you are partially correct. Depends what school and teacher you learned from. This is not quite how I learned these techniques, this resembles Aikido more. And yes these techniques are deadly on the street. I have been jumped twice by multiple guys and it works great.

You don't know kuroda sensei's methods or martial philosophy. I have met him and currently train his style. So that puts me way ahead of you in THIS particular style. What else you have trained is not up for debate.You need more research on Japanese Koryu because this is what this is. There are many many 2 MAN KATA in this system armed and unarmed. You DONT TRAIN THIS STYLE AND I DO YET YOU ARE TRYING TO TELL ME WHAT IS GOING ON?! Who is the ignorant one?

Two man drill ,Yes .Form NO ..Sounds to me like you live in a DREAM world .I do no almost everything there is to know about every cultures martial arts Have trained for over thirty years ,in styles from all over the globe .You are talking to the wrong person . YOU ARE THE CHILD WHO IS MISINFORMED . And this ignorant debate will stop here !. Go back to karate kid school !!

Just a technicality... Ju (柔)and Bu (武) are two different characters that share no relation.

You know nothing of tradition.... while I agree most Aikido is soft, traditional Jujutsu is not. Traditional Jujutsu is for killing people on the battlefield.... perhaps you've never seen it?

KATA.

No, THIS IS KATA...I can even tell you the names of each of these TWO MEN KATA. How would you know what this style does or doesn't train it's practitioners to do? This isn't Aikido, it's classical jujutsu and what you are seeing is a two man drill/form. Since you haven't met Kuroda Sensei or know his theories, you should not speak of something you know nothing about or have experienced.

ofcourse they do!!! Not all hand to hand combat starts with punshing or kicking so if someone grabs your arm or something you can execute those. but you are right, with traditional selfdefense styles its hard to stop a punshing and kicking opponent

NO it isn't KATA . YOU ARE WRONG!!! . And just like most aikido stylists or traditional systems where limbs are given to opponents to execute. a throw or joint manipulation. There is no way that they can catch the quick hands of a trained technician..Without trapping or parrying to slowing the opponents hands down. first.. Which is something these styles do not train to DO!!

They are learning technices. I appliy my Aikido and Jutisu to modern combat...And they work great...

Um...this is a kata...it is not supposed to be realistic. It is used to train principles that are to be practically applied in combat. What you are watching is an exercise. This NOT how they would fight you in real life. In kata, there is a sequence of movements that trains your body. This isn't sparring.

I love the traditional arts, BUT TO BAD THEY ARE SO UNREALISTIC. , AN ATTACKER IN THE STREET DOES NOT HAND YOU HIS LIMBS AND SAY OH ,HERES MY HAND THROW ME ,HERES MY ARM .TRAP IT ,DOESN"T HAPPIN THAT WAY. IN THE REALWORLD.

As I understand it: Ju jutsu, referring to the Japanese art as opposed to jiu jitsu (Brazilian) was the art passed down by families from the samurai days. To fit into a modern society, where one didnt have to fight, defend and kill, judo was DERIVED-as a sport. Ju jutsu was still present, but due to the brutal nature, less popular.Having studied both, i say spell it any way you like, the word is Japanese anyway. If you want to get technical, learn to write the Japanese characters!!

Actually the traditional saying and spelling is Ju-Jutsu, coming from Bu-Jutsu.

then, after the 1900ts, people started combining some styles with judo (usualy Karate) and started calling the martial arts that came from this Ju Jutsu. but they are not really ju jutsu schools. in ju jutsu you usually have to know a weapon or 2 and you have to defend against it just by mutodori. what "school" teaches that nowadays?? so, yeah, traditional Ju Jutsu schools have nothing to do with Karate. modern ones though...

ju jutsu (it really doesn't matter how you translate it in romanji btw, except in the brazilian jiu jitsu "martial art") was not a style per se until after the 1900. all schools that practiced bare hand fighting were collectively named ju jutsu schools. the name of the ryu's differed, but they were all ju jutsu schools. after the meiji restoration, judo was "invented" as a way to keep the schools alive even with some compromises made.

no need to appolygise... im sure that it´s NOT aikido though.