> sharonshapiro said on
12-01-2009 at
17:32:
I guess killing that guy really slowly would be a good enough punishment.as for her. chicks do that! they pour drinks on guys! that's totally normal. only if it has a good enough reason though. but still. he should be killed.
> LoneSpider666 said on
12-01-2009 at
08:21:
There's a fine line though. if you've done something to justifiably piss her off and she just smacks on you a couple times, there's no need to "defend yourself", because chances are, she's barely phasing you. But, if a bitch comes at me with the intent to maim and/or kill me, I will smack and choke a bitch faster than you can say "good golly miss molly"!
> sarsfieldusmc said on
12-01-2009 at
01:20:
@immadegen if a girl tries and beats up a guy, he has the right to defend himself
> blackknight1129 said on
12-01-2009 at
00:16:
i think it wasnt right for him to go that far.. but she should know if she gone act like she in mean girls nd throw her lil drink on him hes gunna get upset
> rock1chica said on
11-30-2009 at
00:36:
i dont care whether you are a girl or a guy no one deserves to be grabbed and thrown to the ground for pouring your drink on someone.
> ItachiPkedYou said on
11-28-2009 at
20:06:
It's NEVER right for a man to put his hands on a female. And just for a drink poured on him? Come the hell on. That's ridiculous, he needs to be charged with assault and battery and see how he likes getting pushed and kicked to the ground in jail.
> Pontos59 said on
11-27-2009 at
17:08:
you have a girl weird (the worlds gone wrong!!!)
> 3rdknukl said on
11-27-2009 at
09:23:
look at this idiot without volume. I'll bet he was pounded regularly in school. Easy call.
> immadegen said on
11-26-2009 at
08:03:
u guys are sucker..if bitches wana act like men they can get hit like them too
> AlyssaNicoleIppolito said on
11-26-2009 at
08:01:
She's an idiot. She totally deserved it!
> BRPKproductions1 said on
11-26-2009 at
03:27:
thats a hot girl
> redthunda69 said on
11-24-2009 at
21:58:
Oh and that's directed at dayna133. And @SuziG23, I'm trying to start a movement here.... NO MORE WOULD OF's!!!!
> redthunda69 said on
11-24-2009 at
21:57:
I'm confused by this. The correct grammar is "would have", or the contraction "would've", which I suggested people write. "Would of" is incorrect grammar and the phonetic spelling. So if you're trying to say I'm wrong, then you are seriously embarrassing and should think about what you're saying. That's all.
> personman88 said on
11-24-2009 at
05:54:
i'm just sayin bitches be crazy, i watched the hills, i know what you're thinking but let me finishes i have a girlfriend and wanted to have sex later on that night, so back to the hills and jayde be crazy with that brody guy
> doof86 said on
11-24-2009 at
00:26:
Men should never hit women unless they're about to go ape shit crazy on your ass and kill you.
> AllAroundTheClock247 said on
11-23-2009 at
16:36:
Get a life. Read what they say about Gossip in the Bible.
> xerxes465 said on
11-23-2009 at
06:42:
Joe Francis is a douche, but I would have socked that b*tch in the face too.
> SuziG23 said on
11-23-2009 at
05:41:
@redthunda69 Well you should probably just go live in a box because a lot of people do it.
> dayna133 said on
11-23-2009 at
00:02:
redthunda69 you are a ridiculously dumb when ppl sound like they are saying "would of" they are saying "would have" in the abbreviation "would've" which sounds like would of, YOU ARE SERIOUSLY EMBARRASSING think about what you say before you say it you dumb thunder frotch piece
> beakerbeatz said on
11-22-2009 at
17:44:
@callhelpwnage unless there was acid in that glass, it doesn't apply here.