ok well if your calling english dipshit then yes he doesnt talk dipshit...

Are you on crack? Where do you get your information? From the toilet? You are a redneck dipshit. Grow up and grow a pair while you are at it.

Yeah, he is hard to understand for you because he doesn't talk dipshit.

Do you know who is the most influential Country to the US government? Have you seen these PROTEST pictures from America? Google this: who is congress listening to - it will be the first article on Google. If youre interested in this topic, there is a really well done documentary on Google Video: The Israel lobby - The influence of AIPAC on US Foreign Policy.

A POLITICAL MOVEMENT(ZIONISM) HAS BEEN MERGED WITH A RELIGION(JUDAISM) AND A CULTURE(JEWISH/HEBREW). AIPAC is a very harmful ZIONIST EXTREMIST(ZE) organization. To their credit, not all jews are zionists nor religious. I should also mention that I DO NOT want to see the destruction of Israel; I do want to see the destruction of present day Zionism.

RAGtagBAG88 knows exactly what hes talking about....i think he wins these arguements....by the way jakie mason should not even be a radio brodcaster since you can barely understand him...wth is he saying!!!

You were the one who brought up the vote by making the "artificially created" comment. Or did you have something else in mind? You're right. There's no point in continuing a dialog b/c you deny Israel's fundamental right to exist and insist on your right to be an historical ignoramus. Sorry bub, we're here to stay. Tough luck.

Well, now you want to cite the "international vote".Oh dear, "Israel" is presently in breach of more than 140 international laws and UN treaties. Now. At this moment. We needn't talk of "faded historical memory" we can deal with the present.The actions of Israel on their neighbours are criminal & condemned by the international community. I'll leave it there waveor, no point in exchanging with individuals who cannot hear.

"artificially created"? Yes, Israel's creation was sanctioned by an international vote. So were India & Pakistan. But these are not artificial nations. It's a pity that we don't all have the luxury of sweeping centuries of blood letting and carnage under the rug of faded historical memory.

First: I'm NOT British, I'm Irish.Your perspective that the leaders of artificially created Israel is, "asserting their sovereignty & defending their people from slaughter" is a lie.As to your other remarks; yes, I'm baffled that Jews (of all people)could inflict such misery, murder and terror on the Arabs - whose land they stole - or anyone else for that matter.I've tried to see things from Jackie's viewpoint but there aint enough room for both our heads up his Zionist ass!

So sorry that Jews asserting their sovereignty and defending their people from slaughter upsets you so much. I know that the British have alway been a moral beacon for mankind. Like when you colonized India or shipped Jewish refugees back to death camps during WWII. It's fascinating how exercised you get about Israel. It must go beyond your great sympathy for all the people who suffered under the British imperial boot for centuries. "..many fine Jews". I'm going to wretch.

I remember when this guy was funny.He seems to have lost his ability to relate to the truth. Anyone who wants can watch a film by the respected Chanel 4 (UK) documentary team on YT called "The Killing Zone".The criminal acts of Israel are now so brazen the leaders don't care who films it, who knows about it. There are many fine Jews totally opposed to the political philosophy of Zionism - which is now simple gangsterism. Mason probably has some financial stake in Zionism. Sad old bigot.

your a moron

Mr. Mason even though you may be older and has more experience in life than I do....i am only in my early 20's and I can possibly without trying to be cynical that you are one biased, ingorant, uninformed old man who lives in his own fantasy world distorted with his own hatred and ignorance....lol....very sad... : (

So it's you who needs to actually listen to the speech to be able to talk intelligently about the subject.

Listen again. He said, "Some seem to believe that we should negotiate with the terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along. We have heard this foolish delusion before." He's comparing Obama (et al) who say we need to engage diplomatically with our enemies (e.g. Iran) to people from the 40s who appeased. The difference is that the appeasement of the 40s meant conceding entire countries to our enemies, which no one advocates now.

Each new leader must communicate with other national leaders, even those we do not agree with. Even if those communication must be one-sided to begin with. If for no other reason than to let others know we have new leadership in the USA.Where one leader/communicator fails, others may succeed, if for no other reason than previous personality clashesDaniel Kingery, The Next USA PresidentWorldWideWeb(dot)PortablePublishing(dot)com

Not unless Obama was a Senator during WW2?..You really need to have listened to his speech to be able to talk intelligently about the Subject...duh!..as usual it was a way for the left wings loon to try and distort the truth.

it seems like we should discuss about the policy of appeasement before the second world war:the war weariness was huge after the WWI and its not like the consideration of invasion had been scrapped because a war with germany and their allies and the consequences for europe are NOT the same as the status quo of the us and their "enemys". in the u.s. we have a military might whose budget is as big as budget of the rest of the world togetherwell the other side... like they would invade israel

hitler never mentioned darwin in speech or writing ever, do you go to the same retard school as ben stein?