> straygypsy said on
11-27-2009 at
05:52:
Dr. Brown is a liar...The "annointed one" as the scriptures indicate was King Agrippa who died in 41 ad (or 44?).Nowhere does it say anywhere that the annointed one will be the Messiah...
> scanmangr said on
11-27-2009 at
01:25:
nilhavTell me one new prophet since Jesus Christ era.Be well
> nilhav said on
11-26-2009 at
20:36:
PrepareSo no, harah does not mean something about to happen. It is past tense. You need to deal with this crucial issue. Where is the Messiah in this passage? NOWHERE! This child has nothing to do with the son of David, or a future king. This is simply a child who is to be a sign as the child in Isa 8 was a sign. So are you saying that Maher-shalal-hashbaz is the Messiah & God also? Leave this pagan virgin irth stuff alone, & stop your idolatry.
> nilhav said on
11-26-2009 at
20:30:
PrepareSee what I mean? You are bring up points again that I already disproved. Yet you didn't respond to those points. It's because you are so jumpy & running around to Dan & Isa 9, & Joshua. Deal with Isa 7!You said that harah could speak of something about to happen. Even if it did that still rules out Jesus who comes 700 yrs later. But I proved that it is confirmed as past, because the next word "yoledet" is present tense, saying she is bearing the child. So you have a problem.
> nilhav said on
11-26-2009 at
20:01:
PrepareSo it is you that is not reading because you are going around & round in circles. I'm not even going to respond to the Isa 9, & Dan stuff. It is only going to cause you to repeat the cycle. That's why you can't settle down & see anything because you are flipping too many pages. So I'm not the one going in circles, you are.
> nilhav said on
11-26-2009 at
19:52:
PrepareHello, do you read? I proved that almah cannot mean virgin, it has nothing to do with the sexual position of a woman, just like young lady doesn't. Just because the term can be used on a virgin it doesn't mean virgin. The virgin or a lady who is not a virgin can be called young lady. It has no capacity to mean virgin. I showed you Prov 30:18-20 where the almah has relations with a man, there is no way she is a virgin. Sorry!
> nilhav said on
11-26-2009 at
19:16:
PrepareIsa 7 speaks of a child, Isa 8 speaks of a child, Isa 9 speaks of a child. You just can''t take irrelevant points in another chapt & apply it to this chapt. You can't take a verse that says ABC about this child, & apply XYZ that is about a child in another chapter. You say these 2 are connected, thenwhat about the childin the middle, in chp 8? So how can you say these two are connected when another child is spoken of in the middle? You would have to add him too with that thinking.
> nilhav said on
11-26-2009 at
19:05:
PrepareSee here is the problem, Isa 7 does not speaks of the Messiah or a virgin birth, nor does it speak of the same child in Isa 9, who I also do not believe is God. So how can you tell me 4, 5, 6 when you haven't explained 1, 2, 3? Before we can talk about who is in Isa 9, when need to focus on Isa 7. When you are just jumping all over the place, then you are preaching, you are not discussing or examining these things with me. So you have to separate them. Just deal wit Isa 7 for now.
> nilhav said on
11-26-2009 at
18:51:
pearI can't recall what your original comment was about the covenant of death, & why I said what I said. I do know that my point was that the covenant of death is metaphoric. It is not saying we made a covenant with the Antichrist, or in a covenant where we are being killed as Christians think. Why? Because they don't read the context as usual. This says that they thought that they had an agreement with death, that they would not die, by lying to themselves.
> PreparetomeetthyGod said on
11-26-2009 at
17:12:
sorry nilhav, I don't seem able to continue posting for goodness knows whyGod bless
> PreparetomeetthyGod said on
11-26-2009 at
16:40:
what seems to be the problem?
> PreparetomeetthyGod said on
11-26-2009 at
16:34:
I can't post in this video
> PreparetomeetthyGod said on
11-26-2009 at
16:15:
nilhav(Part D-1)You wrote "Isaiah 7:14 has 1 translation, harah is only past tense, she has conceived"My dear Sir, please read my comments THOROUGHLY!!! before commenting please! I said the Hebrew word harah when used PREDICATIVELY CAN REFER TO A CONCEPTION THAT IS ABOUT ....I SAID ABOUT TO OCCUR!!!!!It means that the word can be used to refer to a conception that has NOT OCCURED YET BUT WILL OCCUR IN THE NEAR FUTURE!!!!The word PREDICATE means to base orcont
> PreparetomeetthyGod said on
11-26-2009 at
15:49:
nilhavYou wrote "almah cannot mean virgin. So if a young virgin is called a young lady, does the term 'young lady mean a virgin"Hello, do you read first before commenting? I said THE HEBREW WORD "almah" CAN SOMETIMES MEAN A VIRGIN!!!!!!!Meaning that it DOESN'T ALWAYS carry the meaning inherently but does have THE CAPACITY TO MEAND A VIRGIN!!That makes MATTHEW record perfectly legitimate. Read what I wrote please to stop us going round & round in circles
> PreparetomeetthyGod said on
11-26-2009 at
15:35:
nilhav (Part B-7)what is he doing behaving like GOD BEHAVED WITH MOSES & THE BURNING BUSH????WHY IS HE PRACTICALLY DEMANDING WORSHIP ....I SAID WORSHIP.....I REPEAT WORSHIP FROM JOSHUA, asking him to take his shoes off because the place he is standing on is HOLY?????WHY IS THE PLACE HOLY, BECAUSE GOD IS STANDING ON IT!!!!!!!!Notice scripture doesn't rebuke this angel for this behavior!So how can he not be GOD??????cont
> PreparetomeetthyGod said on
11-26-2009 at
15:28:
nilhav (Part B-6)Joshua 5:13-15 (cont'd) Are you for us or for our enemies?"neither", he replied. "but as COMMANDER OF THE ARMY OF THE LORD I have now come" THEN JOSHUA FELL FACE DOWN TO THE GROUND IN REVERENCE!!!!!! & asked what message does my Lord have for his servant?"THE COMMANDER OF THE LORD'S ARMY replied "TAKE OFF YOUR SANDALS, FOR THE PLACE WHERE YOU ARE STANDING IS HOLY"!!!!!!!!!& JOSHUA DID SO.Now nilhav, tell me if COMMANDER OF THE ARMY IS NOT GODcont
> PreparetomeetthyGod said on
11-26-2009 at
15:18:
nilhav(Part B-5)Scripture still tells us that this COMMANDER OF THE ARMY INDIVIDUAL is GOD!!! We see him DEMANDING WORSHIP FROM JOSHUA!!!!!QUESTION FOR YOU:ARE WE SUPPOSED TO WORSHIP ANGELS OR TO WORSHIP GOD ONLY????? If COMMANDER OF THE ARMY is DEMANDING WORSHIP FROM JOSHUA, THEN HE MUST BE GOD!!!!!!!Joshua 5:13-15 Now when Joshua was near Jericho , he looked up & saw a man standing in front of him WITH A DRAWN SWORD in his hand, Joshua went up to him & asked cont
> PreparetomeetthyGod said on
11-26-2009 at
14:56:
nilhav(Part B-4)Here is this individual called PRINCE of hosts in Dan 8:11, being called GOD & also THE MIGHTY GOD in Isaiah 9:6!!!!!This would rightly fit in with his character in Dan 8:14 where it is IMPLED that he is GOD bcoz he HAS A SANCTUARY BEING DEFILED BY THE LITTLE HORN!!!!! Try & unravel that one for me please!Second your Tanakh says that the individual in Dan 8:11 is the COMMANDER OF THE ARMY & not the. PRINCE OF HOSTS! PERFECT!Doesn't change anything! cont
> PreparetomeetthyGod said on
11-26-2009 at
14:45:
nilhav(Part B-3)to you that further call this individual GOD. We will see how you explain that away, 'course you will try. No one can accuse you of not doing your best to kill Jesus as GOD!!!!Right here goes the PRINCE OF HOSTS in Dan 8:11 He made himself as great as the PRINCE OF HOSTSscripture says that this individual is GOD! Where you ask??Isaiah 9:6 And he will be called Wonderful, Counsellor, Mighty GOD, Everlasting Father, PRINCE of peace!!!!cont
> PreparetomeetthyGod said on
11-26-2009 at
14:34:
nilhav(Part B-2)the little horn in Dan 8:9 was DEFILING, something which scripture managed to convey without even having to use the WORD GOD there. Since you used the word GOD even though it wasn't in the text because you clearly understood from scripture that the little horn by DEFILING THE PRINCE OF THE HOSTS' SANCTUARY, was MAKING HIMSELF EQUAL TO GOD, I will now take it that you are REFUSING TO BELIEVE GOD'S WORD!!!Now what I will do is present 2 situationscont
eMule
games
software
videos
> Emule > Videos > lee > Is Jesus the Jewish Messiah? (1 of 2) Debate - Dr. Michael Brown vs Shmuley Boteach
