> mausolos8 said on
11-27-2009 at
01:46:
@mausolos8 (con't) possible future outcomes. I think it was possible that the US gov't. felt that allowing the 911 attacks to occur was the lesser of many possible future outcomes.This is pure speculation on my part. But it is speculation based on research and intuitive insight. IMO America is still the best place to live.
> mausolos8 said on
11-27-2009 at
01:42:
@dulamel305 I do not know who might be involved. In fact, I do not know if President Bush was involved or not. There is however strong circumstantial evidence that thermite blast charges were used to bring both towers down. This would seem to indicate an inside job. I believe that thwe initial attacks were carried out by Islamic terrorists. But with foreknowledge of elements of the US government. Are you familiar with the concept of remote viewers ? The US government uses them to see
> dulamel305 said on
11-27-2009 at
01:03:
I don't understand why 9/11 would be an "inside job". For any president to know what was going to happen and not doing anything about it (or to approve anything having to do with the killing of any of our brothers and sisters) to me is absolutely insane. Your post is not the first time in which I have heard the theory of "inside job", but I do strongly disagree that the attacks were known ahead of time by our government. Your reference to the NWO - who do you consider to be involved?
> mausolos8 said on
11-26-2009 at
19:56:
In regard to 911.....I believe that the USA did not facilitate 911. But I do believe we knew it was going to happen and did not stop it. We probably did plant explosive charges to bring the towers down. Perhaps the USA leaders ( NWO) had information via remote viewers that the alternatives to stopping the attacks would ultimately be worse for the US. Please consider that currently it suits NWO to have the public believe that 911 WAS an inside job.....That way no martyrs.
> mausolos8 said on
11-26-2009 at
19:50:
@dulamel305 Guys....I have a different perspective on the US invasion of Iraq. Consider that the invasion ocurred for 2 reasons. 1) To intimidate Saudi Arabia into cracking down on the terrorists and their financiers. 2) To create in Iraq a so-called "roach hotel" to attract the terrorists to Iraq where they could be eliminated. The Abu Graib prison scandel was fabricated by the USA to incite more Jihadists to go to Iraq (where they could be dealt with.... ..Thank You
> dulamel305 said on
11-26-2009 at
02:07:
I disagree on the oil and Geneva policies. I belive that Bush invaded Iraq with the belief that Iraq was harboring terrorists (via Saddam's permission, as well as the fact that I think that Saddam was getting some kind of payoff for allowing the training to take place in his country). Secondly, the Geneva Convention applies to soldiers that are fighting for another country 9wearing and representing a country) . Terrorists doun't fight for A country. I do respect your opinions, though.
> wtaves said on
11-25-2009 at
22:47:
True, it wasn't for no reason, it was for oil. But the government lied, saying it was for WMDs. Either way the US broke the Geneva convention and the Nuremberg laws and the entire Bush administration should be tried as war criminals.
> dulamel305 said on
11-25-2009 at
10:19:
I belive that Jesse is a little extreme. We didn't invade Iraq for no reason. We did so based on intell that was gathered. I don't think that Jesse is trying to do "wrong", I just think that his perspective on several issues is not in the best interest of the U.S.
> revelation1965 said on
11-24-2009 at
14:26:
he does make sense, i mean Jesse was part of the Seals demo team so it does make you thing
> Farren2007 said on
11-24-2009 at
02:16:
i say this every damn day at work about 9/11 and they said they were gonna fire me till i said ill sue the shit out of them
> mikespikejones said on
11-23-2009 at
03:17:
US Government is corrupt.9-11 was an inside job.US got its comeuppance.
> FreeThought911 said on
11-19-2009 at
16:20:
@beverlymakenzie can't think of anything better to die for.
> pageplant77 said on
11-18-2009 at
21:41:
Do you even know why Al Qaeda chose to attack the world trade center? It all started out when Osama Bin Laden was an ally of the U.S. many many years ago, and then somehow through the course of time Bin Laden started to hate the u.s. for some reason. And when 9/11 happened he chose the world trade center cuz that was the place of the U.S. Customs which regulated trade, immigration laws, and dug laws.. Bin Laden wanted to take the u.s. down a notch. So the attacks make perfect sense.
> VideoGuyNC said on
11-17-2009 at
19:15:
911 was a production of the Bush administration I believe. The attacks just don't make sense any other way.
> beverlymakenzie said on
11-13-2009 at
21:25:
it wast bushes fault he was given the choice and he would have been killed if he said no
> ivantheterror said on
11-12-2009 at
00:42:
nothing wrong with speaking out. Just get the right facts.
> z914 said on
11-11-2009 at
21:42:
go to wakeup project and watch the Arrivals. ull no wut jesse is talkin bout.
> djassimilator said on
11-11-2009 at
02:20:
You've got to love ventura he is badass he's not scared of speaking out.
> intrusosgang said on
10-29-2009 at
05:20:
Ventura for President
> MrSokitumi said on
10-25-2009 at
02:19:
To announce that there must be no criticism of the President or that we are to stand by the President , right or wrong. Is not only unpatriotic and servile , but is morally treasonable to the American public...Franklyn Theodore Roosevelt 26th President...Vote Ron Paul save my country )o END the New World Order o(
eMule
games
software
videos
> Emule > Videos > howard > Howard Stern - Jesse Ventura on 9/11
