@cowinyourfaceI noticed they are spamming you too.. they are retarded... really.you wrote - "The Myth of Dangerous Human-Caused Climate Change "h t t picecap[.]us/images/uploads/200 705-03AusIMMcorrected.pdf

Thank you for pointing out the YouTube facist programmed 'watchlist' is automatically SPAMMING my free to speech comments !!!Let's just all move to BLIP TV and take away their 'perceived' power over us !!

He has lost it... lost all cred. MUST SEE presentation at Australian Environmental Foundation Conference, 8 Sep 07.The Myth of Dangerous Human-Caused Climate Change h t t picecap[.]us/images/uploads/200705-03AusIMMcorrected.pdfBy Professor Bob Carter, researcher at the Marine Geophysical Laboratory at James Cook University and University of Adelaide. Hes a palaeontologist, stratigrapher, marine geologist and enviro scientist with 30yrs experience

YouTube facists are SPAMMING freedom of speech.Surferpeteinspace remarks ARE NOT SPAM.

Global Warming is a GLOBAL FRAUD, to get you paying Carbon Credit Taxes.Fact is the earth is cooling again.So they are spraying Chemtrails to poison and keep in heat.We the people are sick and tired of the crazy fake paid off scientists, in any other industry they would be disciplined for professional misconduct.In the 80's it was OZONE !In the 90's - Global CoolingIn the 00's - Global WarmingNow 2010 - Global Cooling again !!WATCH THIS EXPOSAY telling the TRUTH/watch?v=FOLkze-9GcI

diesel cars make 5-20times more nox gass and sot. not good for the enviroment. and realy not good for peopel.. 20000 peopel in eu die because of nox every year. you can`t by new diesel car or in 6 amarican states.. normal 2 stroke engines are also baned in some amarican states. new brp/evinrude e-tec 2 stroke can compeat with petrol 4stroke.

that is an easy question to answer.THEY CAN'T !!lolno one has ever come up with a reliable model to predict long term climate change.great point by the way.

most surface temperture data is collected in the states.satellite data also doesn't support what surface temperature data shows.keep in mind, most people will agree we are coming out of an ice age, show temp increase is expected.while pulling ice core samples they also found plants have grown much closer to the poles in times past. temps had to be much higher during those times. possibly 5-15 degrees C.be sure aus temps are from their own stations and also away from urban heat islands.

co2 does not drive temperature. it is a minor gas which is known to be released from the ocean if temperature goes up.co2 changes DO NOT preceed temperature changes. temp change occurs before co2 change by up to 800 years.water vapor influences temp in a negative feedback pattern. ie- temps going up cause more water vapor in the atmosphere which in turn reflects sunlight away. cooler temps allow for less water vapor.this is how the greenhouse effect works.water vapor is 95%-99% of ghg.

in australia diesel cars get tax breaks for being fuel efficient, i am loving choking on their fumes, almost as good as the mercury from compact fluro light bulbs. i hope this big ship starts to turn soon!

i dont get it. these americans say that in america the data is unreliable. how does that mean that the rest of the world (here in aus 2005 was hottest) isn't getting warmer?

Surface temperature has nothing to do with the greenhouse effect. Man DOES affect surface temperature and that is obvious, but proves nothing with regards to demonstrating that CO2 is a driver for global warming by way of amplification of the greenhouse effect.

Jaycephus01: "Really??? Just satellites?"Well, do not ask me, ask NOAA."Or do they in fact have a blend that uses an unpublished algorithm..."And only this algorithm is a reason for saying that Global Warming is real?

my question is: how can they predict what will happen in the future if the weatherman is usually only like 60 percent for tomorrow? the climate is almost impossible to predict, as are tsunamis and all these are catastrophies.

Really??? Just satellites?Or do they in fact have a blend that uses an unpublished algorithm for determining how much weight goes to the faulty ground temps, how those temps should be altered to 'fix' them, etc?

lol:) global warming is not man made... water, food and air quality is whats matters. (health). not co2 and bullshit... nox and sot from diesel is way more dangerus than co2...

I read NOAA and it says different story. As I know is uses satellites

The above was in reply to:starrdreams: "Temperature stations are improperly maintained? :) So what? It's misleading statement. Even if all temperature stations are improperly maintained that doesn't mean whole climate science is mistaken. Because whole image about global climate and temperature is not coming from only temperature stations."The ground-based temps are reading warmer than the other methods of measuring, and therefore the contention over them is important.

Do more research: other sources of temp, such as satellites, show cooling or no heating over the last decade when warming was predicted by the CO2 theorists. The only measurements that show warming are these land-based measurements, many tucked into cities. Cities, concrete, pavement, etc. create a 'heat-island' effect that increases over time as development of cities continues. NASA's Hansen says he 'corrected' for heat-island, but the correction appears to have made temperature higher!

Peer-reviewed :showing computer climate model outputs not matching observation, in other words, what the computer models predict will happen isn't happening :Complete PDF available online, read free. From abstract :"These conclusions contrast strongly with those of recent publications... Copyright 2007 Royal Meteorological Society.... Received 31 May 2007; Accepted 11 October 2007"search :International Journal of Climatology of the Royal Meteorological Society [DOI: 10.1002/joc.1651]