> 0YueFei0 said on
11-11-2008 at
08:46:
Yeah true that, though there were actually considerable periods of Vietnam under Chinese rule. Which is essentially why many Vietnamese scholars, aristocracy, etc were quite accustomed to Chinese philosophy (namely Confucian) and had Chinese names and could also write and read Chinese.Then again same applies for much of Asia before the decline of Imperial Chinese dynasties.
> yoming49 said on
11-11-2008 at
00:37:
but the first emperor of china had a large ass army
> Bighairyfart said on
11-06-2008 at
16:12:
1 in 10 apparently
> Zan3101 said on
11-06-2008 at
00:27:
hitler was nothing compared to stalin, and stalin looks small compared to mao
> Vinamtekdotcom said on
11-04-2008 at
08:07:
Vietnam is located right next to Giant China thousand of years and remains independent because of it guerilla tactics. Many included the French and American fail to study Vietnam history, therefore lost war in Vietnam even with more powerful warfare.
> Vinamtekdotcom said on
11-04-2008 at
07:59:
Genghis Khans descent (Mughul=Mongol) later rised from current day Afganistan conquered India and ruled until 1800s
> heartburn84 said on
10-31-2008 at
08:54:
hopefully asia will rise again!
> djrussell1989 said on
10-29-2008 at
17:12:
Ceasar wasn't Brutal? He killed over 1 million when on his campaigns in Gaul. And when you consider the size of the population at the time, thats a hell of alot. He fought at the front of battle with his troops at times and you say he was "more of a poitician".he wasn't just a politician
> xdemao said on
10-26-2008 at
18:33:
the strange history BBC -_-|||
> tazgrento said on
10-26-2008 at
03:44:
God, I love Conn Iggulden. Have you read the Emperor Series?
> kitanzi said on
10-26-2008 at
00:42:
it ws mongol not Ottoman turk...turk? we expell turk long time before.
> danxtur said on
10-24-2008 at
10:05:
Fear is his allied
> TheSuperiorAsianRace said on
10-23-2008 at
23:42:
wow, i never knew that one of ghengis khan's biographer like yourself is still alive after a couple thousand years.
> KhalilRavana said on
10-21-2008 at
23:45:
to me... besides hitler... genghis khan is the most ruthless big boss around that ever came.. napoleon wasn't brutal, he was brilliant but not brutal.. ceasar was more of a politican rather than a ruthless guy.. attila the hun was the same as khan except khan conquererd more land and more nations.. the first king of china only conquere china, not the world.. genghis khan is freaking awsome and very very ruthless.. vlad tepes was ruthless but he's just a good story for children..
> diadorim1234 said on
10-18-2008 at
19:19:
tell something everybody knows
> shabushabu21 said on
10-18-2008 at
16:15:
yo bilson. tru tht. wolf of the plains was incredible. than the 2 sequels were so good. anyone tht wanna learn more about genghis, read wolf of the plains, lords of the bow, and bones of the hills. all by conn iggulden
> khanbaliq said on
10-18-2008 at
02:41:
Genghis Khan is THE MAN! More people are descended from Geghis than from anyone else.
> halololololoman said on
10-16-2008 at
11:43:
I know! People think he was ruthless, well he did give empires the chance to give up, and pay tribute but if they didnt, then he destroyed them!
> Forensic48 said on
10-16-2008 at
03:23:
Just go to the BBC website and contact them. I'm sure they can give you the information to purchase the DVDs.
> nomin0916 said on
10-15-2008 at
15:00:
haha temujin is his real name and genghis khan is his generalship and borjugun is his generation
eMule
games
software
videos
> Emule > Videos > alexander > Genghis Khan BBC Part 1 of 10
Related videos (25) 
