> wolfeedarkfang said on
08-17-2009 at
18:04:
Yea the word "furry" is such a broad word it doesn't just point you to furry content. Just about anything that might be furry too, such as fur coats, couches, dusters, exc lol.
> Anayo said on
08-17-2009 at
17:58:
Searching the word "furry" turns up pretty innocuous results, but searching the word "furries" does NOT. You might want to address this somehow.
> Wulfsige107 said on
06-14-2009 at
22:38:
oh okay
> wolfeedarkfang said on
06-14-2009 at
08:56:
Its the cursor highlight for camstudio
> Wulfsige107 said on
06-14-2009 at
07:20:
hey what is the yellow circular thing following your mouse?? please reply
> felinoid said on
05-25-2009 at
22:11:
Actually try the search. I got two furry erotica images on the first page. 1 on the second, 4 on the third, 5 on the forth.It's not as clean as it should be.A year ago the porn results were so high they were leaking into the safe search results.
> Mattdamaster said on
05-21-2009 at
20:20:
Ok, why in god's fking name is this video flagged?lol, "can't sleep, furries will rape me" ...Uh yeah, cuz i like anthropomorphic animals which automatically makes me wanna have sex with regular animals... xD
> Wired1599 said on
05-20-2009 at
06:44:
True. I guess you get what you look for. *shrugs* I guess its true what they say... The internet is really really great....for pr0n.. *Sighs* If I wanted to see nudity I'd go to the beach.
> wolfeedarkfang said on
05-16-2009 at
06:44:
Read past comments."TURNING OFF SAFE SEARCH DEFEATS THE PURPOSE OF THIS TEST".Safe search is on by default to all google users. If you turn it off, you definitely will find porn for anything your looking for. The point of this is to use google in it's default state like any newb on the internet would do. I don't know how many times i have to say this. -.-
> Wired1599 said on
05-16-2009 at
04:51:
Wolfee, hate to do this to you bud, but you got one MAJOR problem here. Do the search again with safesearch OFF. You'd be surprized at how much more porn there is then.
> CidSilverWing said on
05-08-2009 at
09:29:
I once found a pic like that first one you highlighted. I can't remember where, but there was this yawning fox with the caption, "Fuwwiez touched my no-no zone!" or some shit like that.
> NeonRaverLakota11 said on
05-02-2009 at
13:55:
Yay for furs almost keeping people off their tails about yiff! ^^
> Fox2128 said on
04-30-2009 at
21:02:
yay :3
> RandyDarkshade said on
04-29-2009 at
14:50:
My filter is on moderate filtering. And it comes up with mostly images suitable for all ages, with the exception of a couple.
> ZeroDragonwolf said on
04-29-2009 at
05:01:
Yeah, they really need to do something about that.
> TrueFurry said on
04-27-2009 at
20:34:
I like using Google Images sometimes. Once you get to page 5 and beyond, it's almost like it stops looking for what you're looking for.
> Pyrophilliac1 said on
04-27-2009 at
18:35:
um yiff was made by a fox in the beginning days of the fandom as a "hello" than a "fuck" :3 gj wolfee!
> tayuyaxsakon0 said on
04-27-2009 at
01:22:
yep,they have cleaned up their search
> VPplaya said on
04-27-2009 at
00:22:
I found the fox picture quite funny.
> felinoid said on
04-26-2009 at
23:20:
I should also add you were insulting my intelligence by trying to pass it off like some sort of insight.The yiff COULD have been posted by furs (maybe, not sure, just guessing)It WAS posted by Anonymous (not a guess)The same anonymous (including furs) that was bitching about the yiff being posted everywhere.OMG but it might have been anonymous furs.And I'm expected to give in to your non-point.