> pompa04 said on
08-14-2009 at
12:34:
Now I´m a lucky owner of a Queen t-shirt myself. Aloud my teenagedaughter to take a trip to Stockholm and as a kind of thank you i guess she bought me one.
> pompa04 said on
08-09-2009 at
09:30:
Stacy Lynn, it´seems your family have a very good taste.
> StacyLynn1216 said on
07-02-2009 at
22:13:
I got this dvd for Christmas last year...as a matter of fact, most of our presents revolved around Queen...t-shirts, jackets, pictures, more dvd's...A great Christmas!!!
> telivision24 said on
04-28-2009 at
22:05:
its a matter of opinion but jagger couldnt lace freddies ballet shoes !! r.i.p freddie still love you
> SatanicMajesty said on
04-28-2009 at
06:11:
That's when Mick Taylor was with the Rolling Stones. Definitely their finest period. Mercury is a better singer, but Mick Jagger is and will always be the best frontman in all of rock history.
> Funkynuts1 said on
03-27-2009 at
00:39:
Fuck off idiot.
> RazrHack said on
02-08-2009 at
16:18:
"Hey big woman, you made an asshole out of me." CLASSIC!
> mcgwire1965 said on
02-07-2009 at
20:07:
The best rockband ever..
> ogredm said on
02-06-2009 at
07:11:
I couldn't agree more.Of course, I think its crazy to argue over Jagger vs. Mercury, since they were/are both absolutely amazing frontmen. In my book, Mercury was the better frontman (I don't think you can argue about the fact that he's the better singer, at least), but Jagger had the better band (again, could be debated, but the Rolling Stones from 68 to 75 were mind blowingly great).
> TheMarkKnight said on
02-04-2009 at
00:18:
Being a frontman is something about STAGE, not life. It doesn't matter if you don't answer all the letters you get from fans, or if you lie in interviews about YOUR OWN PRIVATE life. On stage, without a career of 40 years like the stones... no doubts: Mercury has no rivals. HE is the greatest frontman ever. And the greatest singer, of course. You stoners... come take a walk on the royal side!... :-)
> Rollinleddoor28 said on
01-21-2009 at
17:38:
Apparently you don't know what a frontman is. Being a good frontman doesn't singularly mean giving great performances; it means getting the band noticed, and maintaining its relationship with its fans through interviews and offstage events. If you know anything about Freddie Mercury you should know that he was not very open about his personal life and gave very few interviews, and sometimes lied in those he did.
> Funkynuts1 said on
01-21-2009 at
00:01:
Did jagger perform at live aid? I think he did did'nt he? I can't remember....
> Rollinleddoor28 said on
01-20-2009 at
23:56:
You got it backwards dude. Jagger is the best frontman there has ever been, and most likely the best there ever will be. Singing wise, it's a matter of taste; different styles of prefomance and music.
> Funkynuts1 said on
01-20-2009 at
15:12:
Mick Jagger ??!?!?!? Are you crazy?!?!??! Everyone knows freddie is the greatest frontman ever....sorry to tell you, but Mick Jagger don't come close, in performance, or voice!
> SatanicMajesty said on
01-19-2009 at
00:40:
Freddie Mercury almost rivals Mick Jagger as a front man!Great song and great quality video!Thanks for posting it!
> RichieBullock said on
12-25-2008 at
00:59:
fucking hell yeah !!! great song :)
> retardedimmigrant said on
12-16-2008 at
23:19:
i think 1982 super bowl with queen was there strongest year :D
> YsurantheWhite said on
11-25-2008 at
21:21:
Not Fat Bottomed Girls, but Queen that makes the rocking world goes 'round.
> lesassassins said on
10-28-2008 at
04:11:
this concert is so powerful, freddie and queen at their best
> straffster2 said on
07-29-2008 at
16:40:
damm, i put another 1, overall it shud say me m8 fansys u and wants to shag u in the minge :P:P
eMule
games
software
videos
> Emule > Videos > Fat > Fat bottomed girls - Queen on fire
