> PhotoFinish2008 said on
12-04-2009 at
21:56:
@911TruthVideos I'm 16.How does my age make ANY difference to my input?
> 911TruthVideos said on
12-04-2009 at
20:02:
how old are you photofinish?
> PhotoFinish2008 said on
12-02-2009 at
12:23:
This isn't fake you idiot.Planes move VERY fucking fast, there FLYING.The camera zooms further in, so you cannot see the plane coming, idiot. It would take it like 2 seconds to cross the camera's pan. You clearly see it appear and crash.Idiot.What a disgrace to the memories of these people. If you have any respect for America, and the millions of innocents killed, delete this channel.You are reported.
> lukeyscene said on
12-01-2009 at
12:13:
lol i think its fake aswel
> dewhicular said on
11-11-2009 at
00:35:
I really don't believe you at all, HowlingWaja. I was there, I saw the planes. Many people around me also so them. Maybe in your old age you forgot to grab those coke bottle glasses and clearly mistook what you were looking at. What about the home films of denizens of NYC filming the airplanes crashing into the buildings? Give me a break. Your father, if you're speaking truly, didn't jump because he didn't want to suffer, he jumped to get away from the fire and smoke. Natural human reflex.
> AvonBarksdale101 said on
11-04-2009 at
21:43:
well your name is right your head is fried and full of shit, cause planes dont go that fast they usually stick to 500 an hour or so. That plane came out of nowhere clearly.
> flatcoke123 said on
10-27-2009 at
12:30:
regardless of a plane crash, what if there was a fire? they should still have like parachutes and oxygen tanks up there
> 5nillek5 said on
10-24-2009 at
23:05:
it cant go 900mph everyone would be dead that would rip the metal off the plane like wow....
> HowlingWaja said on
10-19-2009 at
21:03:
Like someone said to you before, this is YouTube. For all you know, I'm a fifty year college professor who's been working and studying the the field of planes and aviation for several years now. Maybe I'm just a stubborn ten year old with good grammar. Maybe I was in a hotel blocks away watching the whole thing and not seeing a single plane hit, and my father jumped from the building because he was burning alive and didn't want to suffer. Unless you have evidence, your claims are invalid.
> HowlingWaja said on
10-19-2009 at
20:46:
It was going far less than that. Some people predict it was going at 500 MPH, but people who created the boeing (the plane type that supposedly crashed into the tours) say that the plane wouldn't be going that speed at that altitude. They say it would have broken apart at that speed long before hitting the building. More than likely, it was only going 150-200 MPH.
> babywithanailgun said on
10-15-2009 at
11:21:
friedpooheadThe plane was going 900 mph? Show us some proof to back up your statement.
> friedpoohead said on
10-13-2009 at
21:57:
well the planes going frikking 900 miles an hour um it will be fast
> IncomingSanity said on
10-07-2009 at
22:02:
Oh, and the plane doesn't go the whole way through the building, dear. It hit the corner of the building at an angle, and the explosion blasted back through the rest of the floor, creating the illusion that it had gone straight through from one side to the other.
> FlashSchark said on
10-06-2009 at
22:19:
This is such a fail.I wonÄt explain now how an aluminum tube can go througt a steel bulig, cause it don't have to.Just cause u see some dirt coming out of the left side it don't have to be a part of the airplain.
> orangeiswhichilove said on
09-27-2009 at
18:39:
do u know when u said the play goes through the tower, well i think it spins around the tower and then goes like through the other side, if that make sence, do u know wat i mean like, please reply, bye
> 911TruthVideos said on
09-26-2009 at
00:28:
whoever told you that is a complete jackassq33ny means nothingflights on 9/11 were 11, 175, 93, and 77
> cikagogi said on
09-24-2009 at
11:00:
Q33NY , try write this on Microsoft Word and change font to windings,,,,,,???Q33NY is the number of this plane fly....
> JiMandaShow1 said on
09-23-2009 at
23:12:
that plane was moving very quick. now i dont belive it either but the planes definitilyhit the tower but i belive there were also bombs in the WTC that morning
> 911TruthVideos said on
09-21-2009 at
15:56:
My stance is that yes, the planes hit the Towers. I am not a subscriber to the No Plane Theory. I do not in any way believe that the planes or the fires caused the collapse. To be clear, I think two planes crashed on 9/11. No plane in PA, and no plane into the Pentagon. One plane hit each Tower, but they were NOT Flight 11 or 175, hence the faked news footage clips (and I do not believe that ALL were faked). Just clarifying my opinions. Thanks for visiting!
> petegrh said on
09-21-2009 at
15:17:
i think the question shouldnt be, did planes hit the towers?, cos, well, hundreds of people saw them. The question should be Did planes cause the collapse? Theres no evidence to say yeah they did. Theres a lot of information out there, scientifically backed which goes against most if not all of the explinations, which says no they didnt.