> ThirdEyeLight said on
11-30-2009 at
04:12:
of course bud. Be who you are.
> AtheistdotEDU said on
11-30-2009 at
04:06:
This guy makes the most amazing videos. He is really a master at it. Good job, man.
> MKD2619 said on
11-30-2009 at
01:58:
@ThirdEyeLight I Was about to point out why this is not nit picking but it's moot at best. All I wanted to convey was how his/her comment made me laugh. Some people call me an ass others smug, I'm OK with this. Are you happy?
> ThirdEyeLight said on
11-30-2009 at
01:22:
Well the important point I guess. I see what you mean, I guess I just see it as nitpicking.
> ThirdEyeLight said on
11-30-2009 at
01:03:
All I was saying is that he agrees with evolution. This is what the video was about. I think he got the point.
> MKD2619 said on
11-30-2009 at
00:44:
@ThirdEyeLight"the theory of evolution is not concerned with the origins or development of the universe or how life has first begun"This statement does not imply anything, it only means what is says. Backajoe however, thinks that this means science does not attempt to answer these other questions. This is incorrect, evolution does not attempt to answer these questions but science most certainly does. I don't have the room but it is quite obvious to me and many others what that statement means.
> ThirdEyeLight said on
11-29-2009 at
20:28:
how did bakajoe100 miss the point?
> crisis123456789 said on
11-29-2009 at
16:25:
@bakajoe100 im glad you have accepted evolution but coming to the conclusion thats its true just because you can now accept it without disturbing your faith in a God is very much missing the point.And of course science has something to say about a God's existence!
> MKD2619 said on
11-29-2009 at
11:18:
@bakajoe100 LOL, you missed the point.
> bakajoe100 said on
11-28-2009 at
08:11:
"...the theory of evolution is not concerned with the origins or development of the universe or how life has first begun."Exactly. That's been my point since I realized that evolution is science. Science does not concern itself with questions of God's existence. That question is a matter of faith and religion.Great video. 5*I've been a Bible believing Christian for 15+ years and have just come to realize the above truth of the matter. After all, does Newton's Laws disprove God's existence?
> endlsswing said on
11-28-2009 at
03:26:
LOL at the super aggressive dog
> knowwaie said on
11-28-2009 at
02:36:
"what will they come up with next"African men covered in fur?
> lightningonoceans said on
11-27-2009 at
20:22:
"Gods are fragile things; they may be killed by a whiff of science or a dose of common sense."-- Chapman Cohen"Men never commit evil so fully and joyfuly as when they do it for religious convictions"-- Blaise Pascal"It is said that men may not be the dreams of the Gods, but rather that the Gods are the dreams of men." - Carl Sagan
> POOPPEPPER said on
11-27-2009 at
17:59:
yeah
> sykeo123 said on
11-27-2009 at
10:29:
pepper,its very simple honestly.it contradicts the bible... Adam and EveEvolution alone does as this video states allow for a divine being to start the 'spark' of life.But what this video doesn't say and is true is it shows Christians are wrong... doesn't show theists are wrong though. (other evidence shows that)Same reason Christians fought the theory of a spherical world... cause the bible states the world is flat with four corners.still believe in evolution?
> POOPPEPPER said on
11-27-2009 at
06:33:
why is it so hard for christians to believe in evolution...im a christian and i believe in evolution
> Shadofax5 said on
11-26-2009 at
15:18:
Calm and collected as always. Use your reason.
> djbanizza said on
11-26-2009 at
12:37:
I was digging in my backyard the other day, and whuddya know? I stumbled upon a crocoduck fossil. I think I shall call it Crocoduckus Cameronicus.
> fornss said on
11-26-2009 at
05:23:
Syense is an abomination tew Gawd and the AMERICAN way. Gowd put syense here tew test mah fayth. JOHN 3:16
> JohnnyKubark said on
11-26-2009 at
01:49:
"What about the first feather?"There were Dinosaurs with proto-down, like sinosauropteryx. Scutes on birds feet and beak sheathes are of the same chemicle composition as feathers and are controlled by the same genes. The scientists Hongyan Zou and Lee Niswander did an experiment on various bird embryos. They injected the fetuses with a virus that blocked the development of certain proteins into their legs. This caused the scutes on the foot to develop into feathers.