> christophr2906 said on
09-20-2009 at
14:14:
Elvis was the 9th best selling artist in the US and Uk last year
> MissChrisBrownx said on
09-20-2009 at
11:50:
are you one of them people that only started to like mj since he died ?and dont say that about tupac because i started listening to tupac about 2 years ago Hes way better than the two of them PUT TOGETHER
> ItsNicasaurus said on
09-20-2009 at
11:34:
How the fuck can you say "What has MJ done?" What didn't he do? He done everything. Him and 2pac are spheres that don't even touch. 2pac isn't a quarter of what Michael was so shut your mouth. Stupid bitch.
> MissChrisBrownx said on
09-20-2009 at
11:31:
Tupac is way better than Michael Jackson.What did MJ do ? teach the world how to dance.
> ItsNicasaurus said on
09-20-2009 at
11:26:
No he really isn't. He's good, but he aint no king. There are two kings, Elvis and thee Michael Jackson :)
> MissChrisBrownx said on
09-20-2009 at
11:25:
you clearly havent listend to any of his songs , to stuck up ?
> ChynnaGirLina said on
09-19-2009 at
23:53:
okay WOW! Elvis and Tupac, totally DIFFERENT! I listen to both i've heard basically every tupac and most elvis songs. Why would you compare them?? They're both great artists who brought alot to the music world. You can have your opinion by thinking one is better then the other, but its completely irrelevant to the fact that they're both from different genres and generations. Music evolves and its foolish to compare different types cause music isnt just one genre its a bunch.
> niklaavs said on
09-19-2009 at
23:52:
right, some rhyiming black guy from projects gave hope, but the king of rockandroll was only good??dude, seriously!...seriously!c'mon!
> MissChrisBrownx said on
09-19-2009 at
22:47:
thats why tupacs music is better , it had a point
> maxxikiller said on
09-19-2009 at
22:40:
How the hell can you compare these two ?Its like comparing India to General motors!
> MissChrisBrownx said on
09-19-2009 at
10:36:
2PAC IS WAAAAAY BETTER
> vasconaut said on
09-18-2009 at
20:28:
lol he does...
> losrompecalles said on
09-18-2009 at
17:08:
wuuuuuuuuuhuuuuuu!!! ELVISSS 4EVER!!!
> lostpolly said on
09-18-2009 at
00:41:
excellent comment/point bennyboy2611. a lot of people need to read this. might help get their heads out of their asses
> DriftK13 said on
09-17-2009 at
14:18:
I'm not a horrible person and sorry if some of you think this might end up being racist somehow. But when i see Elvis spinning round and round on that record.. He looks like a white Muhammad Ali
> bennyboy2611 said on
09-17-2009 at
13:10:
Yeah i know, i was just throwing a cat amongst the pigeons really... i dont know why ppl argue over who was better, they were phenominal in their own way because they were appealing to different mrkts at different times... if mj performed songs in the 50's he would have needed someone like elvis or pat boone to get it out there as thats how it was back then... for example pat boone's shit rendition of little R's tutti frutti appeard higher on the charts than Little R's and his was heaps better!
> rbound827 said on
09-17-2009 at
04:48:
bennyboy-True, the song is a cover. But there are only a handful or artists who can take a song previously recorded, and make their version the definitive one.
> xxXKILLAJJxx said on
09-17-2009 at
04:13:
well that will be gay
> 102Help said on
09-17-2009 at
01:00:
right george got cancer by smokeing too much and john was soht sighning atographs
> Thingamuhjig95 said on
09-16-2009 at
21:40:
george died of cancer and john was shot get ur facts straight -.-