> believerster said on
12-24-08 at
19:08:
Are you sure? I'm pretty sure the Thumbsucker one is a more polished studio version...
> benmeltzer said on
12-24-08 at
18:29:
Turns out the Lucky 3 and Thumbsucker versions are one and the same. I'm comparing to New Moon version right now. Best-ever might also be Sweden '98, a great soundboard recording. The song fits him like a glove.
> benmeltzer said on
12-24-08 at
18:47:
I was on the phone with a friend to whom I had sent some stuff and said "I'll make you an fanatic in four minutes. Go listen, really listen, to Plainclothes Man." I pointed her to a particular live version. She called back awestruck, quoting the song and saying it was the best thing she ever heard. So I'd say the gritty stuff might be the way to turn people on. But everyone's different. The main thing is to have them realy listen--not in the car or as background, but real intent listening.
> AlexStevens42 said on
12-25-08 at
12:11:
*sigh* what I would give to be able to have known him
> jonpianobass said on
12-30-08 at
13:39:
elliott is one of the best musicians portland has ever produced if not the best. he's greatly missed here in the indie capitol
> GARYcommaINDIANA said on
12-31-08 at
00:54:
It's an early/alternate acoustic version of Baby Britain. There's a great cover of this version on YouTube...search "Baby Britain Lucky Three". Enjoy.
> isolationeitheror said on
12-30-08 at
20:57:
what is the song playing during the 1st minute
> M3lloW55 said on
01-03-09 at
10:11:
i tihnk your friends probablly like metal or hip hop. haha no taste
> MitchGettman said on
01-03-09 at
23:10:
Is the acoustic song at the begining and in between Thirteen and Angeles an acoustic version of Baby Britan?
> Transmissionwould said on
01-07-09 at
16:40:
yeah, slowed down instrumental, beautiful./