> gostate101 said on
05-17-2009 at
18:39:
this is not accurate...if he did it on a professional clock it would be like a 4.4 probably
> gochumonks said on
05-17-2009 at
02:16:
I dont know why they really care about the 40's its not like the person with the stop watch is going to stop it right when he crosses the line. So why would .1/.2/.3/.4/.5 even matter.
> redsoxfan4life1295 said on
05-16-2009 at
15:06:
My best time is 5.2 im 13 i think i could do better...
> guttake said on
04-08-2009 at
23:55:
i caN RUN A FOREVER flat
> Pokerboy12345 said on
04-08-2009 at
19:00:
how old how big?????
> UNTOUCHABLE905 said on
04-01-2009 at
21:38:
wow yur probly the greatest
> mrtj300zx said on
03-26-2009 at
23:36:
i ran a 6 when i 8 and now i run a 5.26 and im 12
> rmous said on
03-23-2009 at
22:40:
i need some help im 5''4 100 lbs im 15 and on the football team im small but not fast even alot of the big guys beat me in the 40's, 60's, and 80's how can i get faster
> dirtyniggeronpcp said on
03-23-2009 at
11:29:
Hey guys, I'm 8 years old and I ran a 2.8 second 40 time on 2 broken ankles.
> gudfh said on
03-22-2009 at
22:07:
4.6 is my best time
> bhcdarkness said on
03-21-2009 at
15:36:
if that time is legit he plays the wrong sport. Needs to switch over to T&F.
> st3nkobe said on
03-20-2009 at
05:59:
i could beat that real talk
> thefrenchlive said on
03-16-2009 at
17:24:
even if it was hand time i mean thats fucked up and that really did not look like a 4.16 m sorry......i mean the times i have ran are 4.53 4.56 4.54 4.61 4.71 so my range is from 4.53 to 4.71 theres alot of factors that can be taken into account
> AndyAngelZ said on
02-21-2009 at
23:14:
i can do 40 yard in 5.0 seconds
> bigbuzin555 said on
02-21-2009 at
00:13:
i can run a 4.5. 4.5 feet
> IDB19I said on
02-12-2009 at
02:25:
kay he probley didnt get "4.16" im huge into track/running and theres a hugedifference in hand time and photo time you get more of an advantage with hand time which is why he probley got "4.16"
> YoungTon22 said on
02-11-2009 at
03:18:
how do we know what he ran?
> DCProductions77 said on
01-14-2009 at
17:42:
yeah, chris johnson is doing fine. He ran all over the raven and thats one the best defense in nfl. He had 70 yards in the first quarter and he hurt himself. If chris would have been in the game and stayed, that outcome might have changed.
> DUBSKEET said on
01-11-2009 at
16:51:
i know this video is kinda old but listen here mr bears fan. im a ravens fan. bears suck.. no playoffs ? they played the baltimore #2 defense and chris johnson had 100+ yards in the first half. you're an idiot. stop criticizing people with more talent then you. Do some research.
> albinator03 said on
01-11-2009 at
06:57:
that was ridiculous