> ngarey said on
06-21-2008 at
08:20:
<3 mathews
> goonercrew08 said on
05-17-2008 at
17:03:
Singing lessons?
> 2025DPlaza said on
05-08-2008 at
23:37:
I have to have the opinion of other people on this question: Do you think it is a coincidence that George Soros' candidates (whoever he happens to back), always end up winning the nomination of their party? In 2004, it was John Kerry. In 2008, it's Obama and John McCain. Search Ann Coulter, "McCain-Obama NIGHTMARE" and Ann Coulter: "I'm ready for President Hussein." Does George Soros have magical powers or does he have extreme influence in the MSM (mainstream media)?
> graigsmith said on
05-08-2008 at
03:34:
"and not let her emotions get the best of her"i think this is what i worry most about having hillary as a president. i think she would make rash decisions. where as i think obama would be more likely to consider broader consequences.
> waltermh111 said on
05-07-2008 at
17:31:
actually, i hear that her constituents in new york did not want the war. they overwhelmingly were against it.even then, she should have been educated enough to see through the government smoke screen and not let her emotions get the best of her. even if the voters had wanted it, the fact that she didnt educate herself first before protecting her position says alot about her, alot that i dont like.
> DreamsCumTrue469 said on
05-03-2008 at
09:57:
Nothing like a Nit Wit dumb w broad with her ladened sexual inuendo ubiqitoulsly following you around during a presidential campaign. Guess her next gig will be to haunt Harold Ford, Jr's next campaign. Geez, if only internet assassinations were legal....
> chuckinla said on
04-29-2008 at
20:26:
Hey Pillary!! Vince Foster wants to invite you for a BBQ/Last Supper!!!! I'm so excited for you!! PLEASE EXCEPT the invitation, you deserve it!!!! Think of it Girl, BBQ chicken on your TOAST!!!!! You can celebrate your success with White Water, NAFTA, 47 slayings of people that could expose you and Bill for your CRIMINAL dirty deeds!!!!
> Wuud52 said on
04-29-2008 at
16:16:
You are correct, and that is my problem with Hillary. She made a "calculated gamble" and voted for the war. Not because she wanted it, but because she thought the American people wanted it. She was wrong, the gamble failed, and she is trying to back track. Obama also took a gamble in being against something that might get him labeled as soft on terrorists. If Bush had executed a flawless war, Obama would not be in the running right now. Instead, Clinton looks bad.
> 2012watcher said on
04-28-2008 at
23:09:
Know your presidential candidate before you vote....See the "real" Obama @ his web...."theobamafile."
> cnnlives said on
04-28-2008 at
19:23:
LIES + SCANDALS + ME or NOBODY = HILLARYShe is destroying her Party. Bye, Bye Democratic Party.
> Stormiya said on
04-22-2008 at
19:11:
Oh I agree with that...but she did however attempt to limit bush's control and how long we were there. I think as a president she would exhaust diplomacy before going to war.
> davdi0032 said on
04-22-2008 at
17:42:
fuck ...Clinton
> SeventiesPopRock said on
04-22-2008 at
00:41:
By voting for the war when 20 other Democrats and one Republican sustained. Hillary saw the need to prove she was a hawk in military matters. She wanted to win over more conservative voters from the Red States. The war was more of a political matter for the Clintons.
> Stormiya said on
04-22-2008 at
00:35:
How Exactly does this war fall squarely on the shoulders of Clinton?
> SeventiesPopRock said on
04-18-2008 at
06:17:
Concerning the War in Iraq, a few weeks ago Hillary said she would take the advice of the field generals and Commanders on the ground before bringing our troops home. (just like Bush is doing now) But just recently, Hillary said she would bring the troops home immediately if elected. Which is it Hillary? The fact is, neither Hillary, or Obama can bring our troops home until it's in America and Iraqs best interest to do so. This war falls squarely on the shoulders on Bush and Clinton.
> YouuTuubeVideozz said on
04-18-2008 at
04:52:
hey news man...she still doesnt think anytthing of u lol
> xiner said on
04-17-2008 at
12:38:
There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses. (Ezekiel 23:20)2 Samuel 6:14: And David danced before the LORD with all his might; and David was girded with a linen ephod.
> DearNadia said on
04-15-2008 at
23:57:
I am not offended by darkies because if someone is trying to put me down because i am dark skinned, I am confused...I love my brown skin and so I flip it and make it a compliment. Don't let people make fun of ur skin tone if you are anything other than light skin.
> RobertsGames said on
04-12-2008 at
21:59:
racist are weird, but you used the word darkie too, so just because others said it you still used it.
> DearNadia said on
04-12-2008 at
06:56:
you lost me...read the chain of comments...i am not the one who called obama a darkie...this is the problem with trying to hold a debate on youtube...it gets lost in translation. anyways...i still believe all races should have love for themselves...maybe pride is too strong a word and its probably not moral since being prideful is a sin in the bible...isn't it? anyhoo...i love you regardless of your views...i love everyone...or at least i strive to. i still believe racists are weird...peace