> CollapseDev said on
11-26-2009 at
11:06:
You may be right - sadly natural births are nearing an extinction because of the patheticness of the individuals & the naivety thay have among other reasons - this may wreak('s) havock on the experience as well as being " present " during the " delivery " was of importance - I said was because clearly now this is not the case - the messed up docs & nurses are also to blame.
> hobatu said on
11-23-2009 at
16:35:
What happened to cloning of babies? As far as I'm aware nobody even tried it since it's unethical to do just for the sake of trying. Besides, the technology has been in existence for just a few years.P.S. What the hell is god's boundaries supposed to mean?
> susscamper said on
11-23-2009 at
13:21:
1. You are probably a man2. You believe alot in science3. What happened to cloning of babies?4. Wake up. Scientists do all this but cant go beyond God's boundaries...
> susscamper said on
11-23-2009 at
13:18:
Thanks for the info. I had a c-section birth but didnt know what exactly happened. I will have the same for my next baby but then i will know exactly what will be happening.
> dannybabyable said on
11-17-2009 at
20:09:
go wrong again if i tried to have a vaginal birth again...she was born perfectly healthy and it turned out that the cord was around her neck aswell so i was haunted....wouldnt regret it for a second i have 3 kids that are healthy and thats the main thing
> dannybabyable said on
11-17-2009 at
20:08:
i have 3 children..my dughter(my first)was born naturally...no problems..my second(my son)after 25 hours of labour my doctor decided he was in fetal distress and i had an emergency c section i was put to sleep as he was in to much distress the cord was tightly wrapped around his neck..my third a girl...was a planned section because i was terrified something would
> Xinoutorah said on
11-17-2009 at
03:38:
Agreed. I read articles about women who have c-sections because they want to have a baby on a specific date...that's just wrong.
> Xinoutorah said on
11-17-2009 at
03:37:
It'll be like "Brave New World" where giving birth is unnatural... I am having a natural birth, that's for sure.
> hobatu said on
11-16-2009 at
21:01:
I'm absolutely sure no people will be delivering babies in about 200 years. They will be grown in lab conditions, but with technology to aid the bonding, learning and all the emotional stuff that normally happens before birth. But women just won't want to go through this thing, and in time the ability to give birth naturally or conceive will be lost altogether. In 400 years time, people will be prohibited to reproduce, with communities deciding what type of children should be manufactured.
> Milky1944 said on
11-16-2009 at
02:06:
modern medical science is truely amazing.
> MalibuSunrise1 said on
11-14-2009 at
16:07:
I think I fainted.
> GinniGee said on
11-11-2009 at
06:26:
I agree with Kady. I've had 3 natural births. Babies need to pass the birth canal for their chest to be depressed & flex again for the baby's lungs to fill with air and start breathing - naturally. If our bodies can CREATE a baby, then let the natural process of delivery happen.Besides, the recovery period is almost instant. Within half an hour of the birth of my babies.I have nothing against Cesarean sections, provided there's a medical reason for it - not for the convenience!Peace.
> antiffer said on
11-11-2009 at
02:45:
SAME!
> kadyJ45 said on
11-09-2009 at
10:51:
I am a nurse. I highly reccommend natural child birth. C-Sections may seem like the easy way out but it is an intrusive procedure that presents great risks to the mother and child as far as infection goes. Natural childbirth is not as bad as people believe it to be and has many great benefits that c-sections deprive you of! Yes, it is necessary to have a c-section in some cases but when given a choice...choose natural childbirth! You won't regret it!
> Pusga2 said on
11-07-2009 at
19:40:
ow... i am sorry for that...
> SvenskaGirl92 said on
11-05-2009 at
10:21:
I had my baby girl at 16 (no need to judge!!) and it wasn't THAT bad! I honestly dont envy my mom for having 2 go through a c-section when i was born!
> bdsilva11 said on
11-05-2009 at
09:25:
Doesn't the doctor have to go through 7 layers to get to the baby, not just the two incisions they mention here? I think it's important that women understand that this is major abdominal surgery and don't push themselves too hard immediately post op and during the early postnatal period. Any woman that goes through pregnancy and childbirth is amazing.
> duhjuce said on
11-05-2009 at
07:15:
Look, there are circumstances where this procedure is necessary, I have not made such a statement. If you think this is a better method than natural, vaginal delivery you are sadly mistaken. As I commented previously, I have had both normal and surgery. For mothers who choose surgery over the natural process, you have your priorities misconstrued, for you and your baby. As well for the Ob/Gyn who wants more money and schedule the surgery to his/her convenience you should not be practicing peace
> crazyhustlin said on
11-04-2009 at
21:52:
Designed hahahah
> didololly said on
11-04-2009 at
17:46:
the vagina was designed for a normal child birth. my son was too big for that! so I completely agree with chalklot!