> dmbf1783 said on
11-30-2009 at
20:01:
The name is because the headlights opens like a VA - GINA LOL
> pred1990 said on
11-29-2009 at
18:03:
The more technology the less chance mechanics will have to fix this at home or regular people will not be able to do an oil change, sooo this is very very stupid.
> Centrus67 said on
11-28-2009 at
23:15:
when is the BMW ENIS coming out???
> ToluNigaBoy said on
11-27-2009 at
23:39:
its alive. seriously!! and in a few years other cars like these will come out. i mean just because its a concept does not mean it will never come out. the rx8 was a concept. anyway time will tell. but hands down that is an ingenious design theory
> ReFueL78 said on
11-27-2009 at
21:44:
why the fuck is everyone fighting over a fucking concept car? its never going to be produced so no one is going to have to worry about its pros and cons. just drop it
> DarDarBanks1 said on
11-25-2009 at
05:40:
hence the name "GINA"..lmao
> mo20072007 said on
11-24-2009 at
15:45:
da boot is opening up just like pussy!! hehe :P
> kwaky2005 said on
11-21-2009 at
07:59:
So perhaps I am wrong here but your saying the entire shell and body of a car weighs (if done in ultra light weight aluminum) 100 lbs? Your mommy needs to tell her brother to use a condom next time so you don't happen again.
> kwaky2005 said on
11-21-2009 at
07:58:
Ok most efficient aerodynamic for for turning? Straight line? Fuel efficiency or traction? As I am sure in all of your engineering experience you understand that each of those dictates a different form and to be efficient needs the forces applied in a different manner? Or is it n all your 20 years? of Age you still can't hold anything more intelligent than your ED member?
> YuG074 said on
11-21-2009 at
06:34:
if you knew that much about cars (which you dont look like you do) you'd know that this is NOT gonna go through production and only a fool would think that. You really think these dudes who are engineers didnt think about your little idea of slashing the cloth? Obviously they thought about it but they don't give a shit its a concept car its not made to be produced. And stop saying their wasting their time as every car company makes ridiculous concept cars as well. like someone would buy this:
> YuG074 said on
11-21-2009 at
06:23:
jesus christ dude.. i don't even know what to say to you from what I read from others on your channel page, your ''recent activity'' comments.. your really an asshole. Perhaps while I 'learn to read' you should learn to respect people and have some consideration for people's fucking opinions..
> Drayger90 said on
11-21-2009 at
01:18:
Whats up with the doors
> bEaZzy89 said on
11-20-2009 at
14:59:
im pretty sure ur wrong, learn to read. He said why settle for a ULWA 500lb weight reduction when by using this material u can probably drop 700lbs. so he was saying 200lbs less then whatever lightweight shit is on the market. And if youve ever seen or held ulwa, youd realize a car that an entire exterior composed of it would only weight about 100lbs, so dropping 200lbs would be impossible, even if you took the entire exterior off and left just the metal chassis.
> bEaZzy89 said on
11-20-2009 at
14:51:
what the fuck are u talking about? do you understand the english language? dont act smart with people when ur clearly a dumbass. ur explaining the changing shape feature when i already proved it to be pointless. you change the car to its most aerodynamic form ONCE.. then you leave it there, and thats it. Theres no reason to have to go back to a Less aerodynamic form u cock sucker. Its not rocket science ur just a fanboy who doesnt want to admit somethin he found to be so cool is fuckin pointless
> MrAbes89 said on
11-20-2009 at
10:28:
Il mezzo più assurdo mai concepito...
> kwaky2005 said on
11-20-2009 at
03:43:
I think you mean use Your brain and yes actually it was done quite quickly and the more aerodynamically efficient a car is the faster better everything the car does..For instance you could preprogram body "air bags" to change shape depending on speed for more downforce or less. If you choose to comment first choose to think then type
> bEaZzy89 said on
11-19-2009 at
15:27:
Yea i dont know if u have ever worked as a mechanic or known anyone who did, but it really doesnt cost much to buff and paint the car either. For a professional its as easy as replacing the "skin" on this car, but the thousands u get charged are basically all labor costs. That wouldnt change for this car either, they take old skin off, put new one on, send u a bill for 2 grand. This is the real world man, nobody is repairing the entire exterior or ur car for cheap, even if it only cost them $20
> bEaZzy89 said on
11-19-2009 at
15:19:
Simple 500 dollar repair? Who the fuck are u, bill gates? This car could so easily be vandalized to the point where it would be embarrassing to take out in public, and id probably be the first to do it to any moron stupid enough to buy this piece of shit. And u say u can change aerodynamic efficiency, who gives a shit? Why would u do that anyway its a pointless feature, u change it to its most efficient form, and leave it there.. when would u ever NEED ur car to be less aerodynamic? Use ur brain
> YuG074 said on
11-19-2009 at
05:19:
dude im pretty sure he meant 500lbs less than whatever lightweight shit is on the market atm.. not 500lbs less than a normal stock car..
> YuG074 said on
11-19-2009 at
05:16:
thumbs down from canada