> Kavarz said on
11-23-2009 at
13:16:
He's gay you retard thats how.
> groterichard said on
11-23-2009 at
13:08:
yea ahahahha XD
> clubneokinz said on
11-23-2009 at
12:09:
i wonder how he keeps his boner down
> Whore4Horror said on
11-23-2009 at
11:59:
Rastafarians > ChristiansEven if you're an atheist and your name is meant to be ironic, I would just like to point out that Rastafarians tend to be more peaceful and logical than any other facet of Christianity.Jah Bless! :-D
> spazburd said on
11-23-2009 at
11:58:
Nomnomnomnomnomnomnom.
> NWOrm88 said on
11-23-2009 at
10:54:
go suck a dick
> badboomchickaboomboo said on
11-23-2009 at
10:29:
fuck you for making me laugh at this
> GraphiteEater said on
11-23-2009 at
08:07:
I just knew that this video would have a huge flame war in the comments.
> xkalynx said on
11-23-2009 at
07:38:
lols
> BiblicalRastafari said on
11-23-2009 at
05:41:
salvation, but there are more people who claim Christ and claim righteousness in His name, but contradict themselves completely through materialism, corruption, lust, etc. etc.What I am saying is that Atheists are not the greatest killers, Christians are. Which is highly ironic.And Atheists are actually highly logical.I.E., God doesn't exist because there is no proof of His existence. Thats a good point, can you prove God exists?No, you can't. You must believe. That is what Atheists lack
> BiblicalRastafari said on
11-23-2009 at
05:38:
Dude, what is wrong with you.That isn't even what the conversation is about. You used that exact theory to try and discredit atheism and now you are contradicting yourself.Look buddy, no matter what the religion is, people use it as justification for murder. You are trying to make Christians sound so righteous, but Christians have killed the most amount of people in recorded history, brother.That is very factual, can't argue that point.Basically, yes you are right. Jesus Christ IS
> PDC1987 said on
11-23-2009 at
04:54:
LMFAO. Hitler was a Christian.
> strumstrumstrum said on
11-23-2009 at
04:45:
ahhh hahahahah!!! this is awesome.
> Purrebark said on
11-23-2009 at
04:13:
that is exactly the kind of "logic" atheists uses that kills so many people. don't you see that the only way to salvation and love is our lord jesus christ and god. wake up!
> BiblicalRastafari said on
11-23-2009 at
03:43:
So basically what I am saying here is that apple and pear are in theory the same word, or at least they are both of the same derivative. Which is pyrus. And pyrus is cognate (born with) the word fructis. So, if fructis and pyrus are, in theory, the same word, then the words apple and pear both mean fruit and fruit means pear and apple.So in the Bible, as it has been translated, has called the forbidden fruit an apple.And I wasn't complainingBut nonetheless, I do indeed think things through
> BiblicalRastafari said on
11-23-2009 at
03:38:
First of all. it was one big joke there buddySo calm downAnd second of allthere are some versions in which the forbidden fruit is called an apple.Because, if you were to do your research, you would find that the word for apple in the Latin text, is related to the word for pear, and they are related based on the type of tree. Which is pyrus. And if you knew the phonetic alphabet, you would know that pyrus is cognate with fructis. Which means fruit. P=F, S=T, drop the mid-vowel, voila!
> chanohack said on
11-23-2009 at
03:12:
They aren't naked because it was made for TV.... obviously. And the bible doesn't say anything about an "apple." Too bad you don't research (or think through) what you complain about.
> BiblicalRastafari said on
11-23-2009 at
03:06:
What I am trippin on is this..Doesn't it say in the Bible that it is because of Adam and Eve eating the apple that they became aware of their nakedness and were therefore ashamed and had to cover themselves?I'm just saying, I saw the apple and the serpent in there and Eve walked right past them, but neither her nor Adam were completely naked. Wassup with that?So many questions.Too bad people don't stay more true to the Bibles teachings and depictions.BummerAnyways,Rastafari Lives Idren
> BiblicalRastafari said on
11-23-2009 at
03:02:
And where does the Vatican fit into your theory?How about the Crusaders killing in the name of Christ?How about America, killing frantically when we are for a majority Christian?Makes you wonder huh?What about Hitler?Was he a Catholic?Think you hypotheses through a little more and you wont be seen a fool on youtube.No offense intended, just saying
> mistakrunk said on
11-23-2009 at
02:47:
Absolutely nothing. Frogs have no relation to beer, but Budwiser made millions off that ad campaign.