> Ciaresayton said on
11-07-2009 at
22:30:
This was a 9 to 5 job, yawn. They have put so much video out there, I seriously doubt if any commercial liner crashed anywhere that day. People would rather believe in the tooth fairy rather than acknwledge these politicians, warpigs and banksters should be rounded up, given truth syrum, found guilty and executed for the highest crimes against this country. Isreal, the federal reserve and the cia are the greatest debiltators of world peace, justice and free will.
> Tigression said on
11-05-2009 at
21:22:
The truth will set us free !
> streetkill26 said on
11-04-2009 at
00:17:
this is stupid dont talk about what u think u couldnt even see the first clip well enough therefor u cant assume anything
> AnotherRandomFellow said on
11-01-2009 at
21:26:
You summed it up!
> durizap said on
10-31-2009 at
23:29:
In the argument you just presented, you clearly assume that it is not possible to tear a buildings floors down with demolition without bringing down the core with it. Are you sure about this? Can you help me verify for myself if that is the case?If not, your argument hits the floor, sorry pal.
> mseals29 said on
10-31-2009 at
23:03:
It was not cause by fire alone you IDIOT A FUCKING PLANE slammed into it. If you look at the video of the falling towers you can SEE the core still standing in the smoke cloud, AFTER the collapse. The core columns are blown in a controlled demo, meaning that IF this was a controlled demo then the core would have fallen with the rest of the building! That is logic and FACT. Where is yours?
> durizap said on
10-31-2009 at
22:53:
First steel buildings ever to collapse from fire, and precisely on top of themselves. Normally demolition engineers spend months when trying to make a huge structure collapse onto itself by placing demolition the correct places.This time, the planes BOTH hit exactly so the buildings collapsed onto themselves, not falling sideways at all.I hope you recover your sense of logic, because it seems like you have given it away to the authorities.
> mseals29 said on
10-31-2009 at
01:24:
The buildings DID NOT fall at free fall speed. the debris falling next to the building is falling at free fall because the debris is falling FASTER than the building is. And as for the "explosions" in your video here, Those are caused by kinetic energy being transferred to heat energy at the moment of impact. Simple high school physics!
> Nicoladrag said on
10-22-2009 at
15:10:
to all the doubters, who are insulting the ones who ask questions....ref a missile? A10 pilots, have phosphrous rounds, in pods. Their purpose, to enter something, and ignite, fuel and combustables. Dont even try slagging me off about this, as its well documented. Perhaps, the supposed "pod" that people say is there, contained a phosphorous round, to ensure the fuel rupturing from the tanks on impact with the WTC, ignited?
> aligoulou said on
10-20-2009 at
19:34:
iM sick of all that crap!!!!we know...the world knows that 9/11 was a complete fraud......LET THE TRUTH COME OUT...
> michaeledith said on
10-19-2009 at
07:46:
well said bro, all 3 blds collaspe basical the same way....thats impossible, unless there was extra help to bring them down??
> Fradazzeled said on
10-18-2009 at
21:27:
im pretty sure that skulls and bones is a fraternity, not a terroist group, and you have no facts, i mean the CIA is a very secretive force how would anyone but people on the inside know of thier secrets, your just assuming, so there for i believe your wrong
> MisterSnig said on
10-16-2009 at
18:24:
As does yours.
> Thejoseph04 said on
10-16-2009 at
02:10:
9/11 was a inside job by our own government. Just like oklahoma city,pearl harbor and JFK. People are afraid to accept the fact that US government are nothing but evil people who kill inocent people. Lee Harvey did not shoot JFK, he was only the fall guy,Oklahoma city and the World trade center had bombs inside of them and every US president has been a member in either skulls and bones or the free masons. Bin laden is hiding with the help by the CIA and mankind never landed on the moon
> noahsark376 said on
10-15-2009 at
06:14:
Your argument is completely subjective; one can't say that because A we can assume B and C.As each second passed, more and more weight was dropping on the remaining intact parts of the building. If you look at the video of either tower collapsing, you can see that the falling mass both increases and accelerates. The reason they fell in identical fashion was because structurally they were identical, and they were both hit by Boeing 767's in roughly the same areas.
> 911REICHSTAG said on
10-15-2009 at
05:56:
I think the 10 seconds that is being referred to is from when the collapse initiated until its completion. It was at free-fall speed indicating the lower supports did not provide any resistance at all to the falling mass, meaning that thousands of steel-trussed joints all failed instantly and simultaneously in identical fashion in two skyscrapers.
> noahsark376 said on
10-15-2009 at
04:46:
They didn't fall down in 10 seconds; there were fifty-six minutes between the plane crash and the collapse of the south tower, and another 30 before the North tower would collapse. You're a conspiracy theorist because you distort facts to fit events, and you're a pseudo-intellectual because you assume that you're smarter than everyone else.And yes, I'm aware that I'm an ignorant, Wussy sheep. =)
> mseals29 said on
10-05-2009 at
21:07:
Its called kinetic energy being transferred to heat energy at the point of impact. Am I the only one who paid attention in physics class? GEEZ!!!!!
> drhatchback said on
09-28-2009 at
20:03:
Also, watch the top of the buildings as they start to fall. They both tip sideways like a normal falling structure would, towards a path of less resistence. Then unexplainabley they change direction and fall straight down into the rest of the building into the path of MOST resistence. Explain to me how you think that happened??
> drhatchback said on
09-28-2009 at
19:58:
jet fuel is 10% stronger then the gasoline in your car its nothing special. All these scientists that you claim be right say this building pancake collapsed, so how then tell me are the bottom floors of the building being crushed when all the debris from the top still hasnt made it that far down to their level yet??? a 10 second pancake collapse of over 100 floors ??..... Its insulting to my intelligence as a human that you think thats even remotely possible ... Trust your common sense