> Jonathontheone said on
12-16-2009 at
23:08:
omg this video is 9 minutes 11 seconds long 9/11
> LauranceCWright said on
12-14-2009 at
08:26:
God this country is destroying itself.
> colleenrox88 said on
12-13-2009 at
02:33:
THIS VIDEO IS 9:11 LONG
> pumasduck said on
12-12-2009 at
18:00:
dont believe it!
> lawharrison said on
12-12-2009 at
08:27:
this is by far the weakest most surcumstantial evidence about 911. Your right. However it was still an inside job
> nimamalek said on
12-10-2009 at
00:53:
pull "them" could refer to people, pull "it" doesnt talk about people. Is English your second language?
> andytsa said on
12-09-2009 at
22:43:
r u sayin that it was an inside job?are you mad sir?are you hallucinating?i will need your full name,adress and occupation delivered to my office at once!your claims are preposterous sir!you are thinking sir which in the united states will be illegal within the next decade!
> luciferiexcelsil said on
12-09-2009 at
03:48:
so, you are bashing and discarting all this theory just because you think pull is misinterpreted on this video?ok!!! now I see why so many were fooled!
> shane5point0 said on
12-05-2009 at
04:25:
how could pull mean to get out in this situation? He clearly says "And they made the decision to pull. Then we watched the building collapse."
> milicbul said on
12-04-2009 at
00:58:
that chick's voice creeps me out
> 1337NASA said on
12-03-2009 at
21:51:
That might also be true. But I know another thing. People take information and twist and turn it until people think something is the truth. So the fact of the matter is that in this case that there's strong evidence to support the inside job theory, and strong evidence to disprove it. In hein sight we're not going to change anyone's minds when they got it set on something. Like you believing it to be an inside job and me not believing it to be.Thatn's case and point, you can't disprove that
> MetalxHeadxTravis666 said on
12-03-2009 at
16:40:
I understand your skepticism completly! It could, indeed, mean a variety of things. It could mean to pull out fireman, policeman, or even other workers that were in the building.But the way that he said it, "We decided to PULL it", clearly shows that he wasnt talking about people. If he was talking about people he would have said THEM. In my opinion he meant, pull the buildings...
> 1337NASA said on
12-03-2009 at
04:15:
It's pathetic how you conspiracy theorists don't think. "Pull" could mean getting out. Or he could just be doing this for his 15 minutes of fame, which is why these stupid conspiracies were made.
> mexmetal666 said on
12-03-2009 at
00:18:
INSIDE JOB!!!!!!
> ihateforigners said on
12-02-2009 at
23:36:
What the FUCK! Pull might mean if you know anything about social things (but these conspiracists don't because they spend all day on their fucking asses) would know pull means, "pull out" or GET THE FUCK OUTTA THERE!
> soon49 said on
12-02-2009 at
21:47:
what are the chances of a table lit on fire having all legs collaps at the same time , from the bottom ? zero. This building fell straight down , bottom first . Every fire produces heat which rises burning the top off , then it will fall inward on the foundation , WTC 7 had its lower foundations , basement , destroyed first and evenly by very corrupt greedy powerful people who still run America .
> ugoezy said on
11-29-2009 at
22:47:
ok if this was the case all they had to do is tell us this from the start...did they?
> CanadianIndian88 said on
11-26-2009 at
06:49:
How do you "pull" a building?With a little fire? are you shitting me...the fires in WTC 7 cant even bring down a small wooden house, it caused collapse of WTC 7? PLEASE!!And if you want to "pull" a building...it takes weeks or even months to engineer the demolition...who are you shitting...Im an engineer, go and tell this story to your grandkids silverstien! they might believe it...
> unclesamnephew666 said on
11-20-2009 at
03:08:
Silverstein lied. He knew what was going to happen.
> mrtuddy said on
11-19-2009 at
02:44:
listen to the words other than "pull." Essentially what Silverstein says is that the building is too damaged already and the fire is uncontainable. He didn't want to cause anymore firefighters their lives.