> FuriousPhil88 said on
12-16-2009 at
06:15:
@newyorkjustice Did you seriously know this guy? And was he really as bad as you say he was?
> Tamaslammer said on
12-16-2009 at
05:24:
Look you fucking nerds....I blew up the WTC buildings with C4 okay?The planes were really inflatable and I rigged 500,000 camcorders to only playback footage that I made myself.It was me.... Ok? Sorry. Won't happen again.So now you can all go home to your imaginary girlfriends and figure out if Michael Jackson is still alive.
> FuriousPhil88 said on
12-16-2009 at
03:12:
Jesus Christ I don't wanna hear this shit. When he screams "OH GOD!" when the tower begins to collapse, I just put myself in his shoes and I don't fucking want to. It's more horrifying than I can imagine. When that guy woke up that morning he had no idea what was in store for him. This is just way too much for me.
> Hei22 said on
12-16-2009 at
02:53:
The VAST majority of the buildings fell straight down, else you would have seen them tip over. What you saw expanding everywhere was concrete being pulverized (Which doesn't happen in gravity-driven collapses). Yes, there were parts of the buildings that didn't fall straight down, but you attribute that to air pressure? I guarantee you that you can't find a single scientific source to support your that statement.
> newyorkjustice said on
12-15-2009 at
23:57:
gee thats the thinking of one of those camel jockeys.Shut up.Maybe in your country.But theres freedom of speech here.
> ETBoston said on
12-15-2009 at
22:03:
Fuck you terrioist Fuck you!why do you have to kill us Americans!Go to hell!
> 0010292 said on
12-15-2009 at
16:37:
wow i can believe this i can imagine the fear of that old guy ofcourse he was being rude just imagine you in that position
> Some1fromYurp said on
12-15-2009 at
13:52:
I never said I was an expert, just find all truther theories neither convincing nor realistic!! Just take a good look at the videos of the towers collapsing! You can clearly see that (contrary to popular truther beliefs) the towers didn't fall exactly in their footprint! A lot of the outside structure fell outward!! Also don't underestimate the airpressure released when a tower like that collapses that violently!
> Hei22 said on
12-15-2009 at
02:08:
Since you're such an expert on the facts behind 9/11 answer me this: How did 4 ton sections of the building get thrown 500 feet laterally if only gravity was pulling them down?
> TheSOMF734 said on
12-14-2009 at
23:53:
@newyorkjustice man thats evil and to wish that upon someone is so terrible. if you were in the same situation you would find your trues self as well. just shut the hell up.
> newyorkjustice said on
12-14-2009 at
22:13:
I feel sorry for the firefighters.I feel for the workers who was there for job ,not sorry for some snob earning 6 figures and didnt do anything for anyone but himself.Listen to how he makes fun of the operator when she spells his name.This guy was worthless.
> newyorkjustice said on
12-14-2009 at
21:42:
What did this man do for the world?I knew him.Did you??????He was a self centered,with a ego as big as the wtc towers.Listen to him.And his true self comes out.Its all about him.He says"Im not ready to die.Ive got young kids at home,my wife thinks Im alright."I knew Mr.Cosgrove.The only thing he thought about was him,and money.He was a bum to humanity.Good riddens kevin
> Some1fromYurp said on
12-14-2009 at
21:30:
LOL!! A truther accusing someone else of pulling facts out of context, how ironic!!Actually you DO need a loud bang to cut through thick steel beams, and yes, a lack of evidence makes me say there was NO thermite! Just because people discribe a building coming apart as 'almoste like an explosion', doesn't mean they're saying it blew up! They're just verbalizing the feeling they had!!
> jaymckervey101 said on
12-14-2009 at
20:09:
Conspiracy theories are so annoying.
> Hei22 said on
12-14-2009 at
03:44:
I don't recall stating it was ONLY thermite, you've taken that out of context. Sorry, but thermite WAS found. Saying it wasn't doesn't make it so. And no, the explosions wouldn't have to be audible all around lower Manhattan. You don't need a few giant explosions to do what a lot of small ones will do. Anyways, there are multiple reports from civilians and emergency personnel that all claimed they heard / were involved with explosions.
> Some1fromYurp said on
12-14-2009 at
00:33:
Well, here's some logic (and reality) for you:1. If there were explosions strong enough to take down the towers, they would have been clearly audible through all of lower Manhattan.2. No thermite was found on ground zero! Don't just blindly believe the truther 'reports', they're just selfserving crock!3. Thermite doesn't explode, it burns! First you say it's thermite and then you say it's explosives? Make up your mind, it can't be both!!
> alexrm82 said on
12-14-2009 at
00:23:
I add: the man at the phone was in the 93rd floor, or some floor close to it. The collapse with all the rubbles starts at the 78th floor, a lot of feets below. I cannot see rubbles or flames close to the 93rd floor where this poor man was calling from.
> alexrm82 said on
12-14-2009 at
00:20:
I could reply: if the reason of the collapse was a bomb,why can't I see any explosion from outside?I can perfectly see an explosion after the airplanes crash with huge flames covering the facade of the building,but I can't see any explosion while the building collapses.And if we want retain that bomb(or bombS)caused the collapse of such buildings,we should be able to see at least great explosion's flames and boom BEFORE the collapse.I don't see flames,I see rubbles DURING the collapse.
> ImGoingLoco145 said on
12-14-2009 at
00:15:
this vid is sad..... :( my dad said told me that him and my big brother were gonna go in there...
> Hei22 said on
12-13-2009 at
22:22:
Except here your logic makes no sense. You're under the impression the bomb MUST be right next to the man on the phone. There could just as well have been bombs on floors near him that made the area around him collapse while he was still alive.