> TommeyLeeReed said on
11-30-2008 at
23:38:
It's call a eletrolysis, not a hydrogen generator.
> 5154952 said on
10-26-2008 at
18:08:
do you use top oil
> AlmostHydrogen said on
10-24-2008 at
23:07:
"I have seen videos of some exploding while in the car"Really? Can you list the titles of these vids cause I havent seen any.BTW I am curious too, thats why I am testing out this hydroxy stuff - to see for myself whether it works or not. My first cell gave me a 14.63% increase in mpg. I am not 100% sold on hydroxy, but the test results are encouraging to say the least.Anyway dont forget to list the titles of these 'exploding while in car' vids.
> AlmostHydrogen said on
10-24-2008 at
23:04:
no conspiracy but if u owned a company would u make a product that takes away ur profits?noBig auto & big oil have been hand in hand for years. If they made a car that ran on water or partly on h2o, that would break both big auto & oil. But what about pure hydrogen cars they make? Easy, that is a product they can produce & sell - its a replacement for gasoline; just another profit stream. By focusing on pure hydrogen, big auto & oil will have profits for another 100+ yrs.go figure;)
> partwerks said on
10-24-2008 at
01:09:
Any thoughts, ideas or suggestions as to how to keep the water from freezing in the winter in the cell?
> whatup061 said on
10-23-2008 at
00:51:
one reason is if you dont check water level the metal can create a spark and ignite hydrogen and this would hurt oil companys bad
> Ergock said on
10-21-2008 at
17:45:
people are stupid, like you.
> PAiiGEANDCOURTNEY said on
10-19-2008 at
10:32:
22/f/single/cam! ne1 want to see? F
> streetphase said on
10-18-2008 at
05:49:
im curious as to where to plumb this into a turbo vehicle that has a maf sensor setup.. if it would be ok to inject it where the air filter is, it would be measured by the maf sensor, then run thru the hot turbo, the intercooler to the throttle body. Would the hot turbo be trouble to potentially ignite the hydrogen?
> masteropie001 said on
10-16-2008 at
06:09:
Use an inefficient alternator (80% efficient) to generate electricity using mechanical energy from the engine. Then use the electricity to generate hydrogen and oxygen (40% efficient). Then burn the hydrogen and oxygen in the engine (40% efficient). So the engine will make 12.8% what the alternator consumes.This technology is effectively a 12.8% efficient battery.
> alienarnold said on
10-16-2008 at
00:34:
is that engine diesel?
> kustomcougar said on
10-11-2008 at
07:54:
you are such a faggot
> dbui72 said on
10-04-2008 at
14:15:
I think it is impractical to implement into production with the liability myself. It will be one more thing consumers have to worry about, plus I have seen videos of some exploding while in the car. But really am skeptical as well, but I have an open mind. I think if it can do something with the extra juice, then why not. Just dont know.
> moneyman10k said on
09-25-2008 at
19:51:
you are wrong and you don't know why. why doesn't every car do this if it is so easy and cheap to more than double the efficiency of the car? do you think there is a conspiracy?
> LBpDC said on
09-25-2008 at
18:47:
Do some research Einstein, this has been around for a very long time. BMW even has a vehicle running off a similar concept.
> eautocad said on
09-24-2008 at
02:19:
I developed a intercooler spray that helps with MPG, HP, and tq on turbo vehicles. Check it out on my channel!
> moneyman10k said on
09-23-2008 at
05:54:
are you joking, this is fake...
> beatfreakish said on
09-14-2008 at
07:57:
In case you missed the point. 60 mpg is much better than 40 mpg
> finemofok said on
09-09-2008 at
18:44:
Does this work on all cars and trucks? How did you make it and hook it up to?
> kayakdad325 said on
09-07-2008 at
12:50:
Our 95 escort wagon gets 35 mpg stock.We are working on adding an hho generator. I assume smaller cars don't need as much HHO. How many LPM of HHO is your output? What kind of set up are you using in your generator?Thanks