> Lelby2 said on
03-17-2008 at
15:38:
You're really not doing yourself any favours by posting these, I don't say this to be mean. My point is that when the court comes to assess matters such as who pays the legal costs for each side they consider the conduct of each party, even if you win the court may consider these videos alledging some sort of conspiricy on the part of the defendants to be in bad taste and not helpful to the cause in which case you may end up paying your own costs anyway. It's not in your best interests.
> SuperPais said on
01-13-2008 at
15:07:
English people and many others. See, you also have many distractions and tv cults around everybody. Entertainement, they say. Now, its NOT ART. ITS ENTERTAINEMENT.ENTERTAINEMENT For what ?
> SuperPais said on
01-13-2008 at
15:03:
2- Well, english people allow it for the first time to fathers, then to mothers and couples, now what ? They will run away ? Or "fight for their rights" ? Well, I'm a believer, but we must fight. Legally, in the streets. Call it a crusade, lol, for justice.
> SuperPais said on
01-13-2008 at
15:02:
Yes, Colin, you have to be careful. New "gods" have their dogmas, you already know it by now. Its a "modern sin" to tell the truth.It remembers me, and is my opinion, that it all starts decades ago, when many courts begun to take away kids of their fathers with no good reason. At all. Then, to mothers and couples to forced adoptions (Of course, kinda business ). Now even a washing machine falls in your head or your wife's, its your fault. Its your "new sin". They think are gods
> myselfrevealed said on
01-12-2008 at
16:13:
it is exactly this kind of behavior that has drawn me to look ever so closely at all the procedures and policies that given down to the man in the street from a higher place, and during this closer look I have deliberately sent letters and on receiving a reply when lucky enough, i have found more and more reason to look even closer. It has only motivated me to make a life's promise, until the day I die, my fight will be to expose the vile order of things. UNTIL THE DAY I DIE. Nieve''
> colinberry1 said on
01-02-2008 at
02:36:
Hi magnumpioahu, thank you for the information I have not had much luck with PI Solicitors' unfortunately. I do believe that this would be an interesting case to follow thanks again.
> magnumpioahu said on
12-31-2007 at
17:23:
It sounds to me like the issues are possibly causation and the question of what injury occured, assume your solicitor has got your medical evidence together , ensure your witness statements are deailed and good look, Your point about punitive damages wont apply. Good luck and obviously this is not intended to be legal advice just my opinion from looking at couple of your videos sure your solicitor can answer many of your questions.
> magnumpioahu said on
12-31-2007 at
17:22:
Hi im a claimant Pi solicitor. In relation to Cogent Solicitors and Praxis Partners they are connected but it isnt anything untoward. Cogent Solicitors is the solicitor wing of the RBS group who will own the Defendant insurance company so they deal with it in house in effect.I have many cases in which they are the Defendant solicitors.
> colinberry1 said on
12-28-2007 at
16:24:
Hi Gemm73, when you are taking on our modern day "God" everything that you have done in your life may work against you, funny that I have been this cleanest of clean person without any records of any type that would work against me, but they have tried to dig and dig right to this current day to use every word that is "spoken" against us, failing to materialize whatever they need they are starting to make it up with the help of all those who represent our case.
> MadBadVoodo said on
12-28-2007 at
04:08:
Keep up the good fight man!Five Stars!!
> Gemm73 said on
12-27-2007 at
23:39:
Hmm, you've done nothing wrong. I can't imagine that the Defendants in this case could have anything to refute this case. If I saw washing machines stored on a high level shelf at my local Costco, I'd be hoppin' mad. It's just negligent!! Peace to you and yours.
> doWestVirginia said on
12-27-2007 at
21:14:
hmmmm